UQx Denial101x Making Sense of Climate Science Denial | UQx DENIAL101x 1.4.3.1 Five Characteristics of Science Denial @denial101x | Uploaded April 2015 | Updated October 2024, 5 hours ago.
Find out about the Five Characteristics of Science Denial, as outlined by Pascal Diethelm and Martin McKee, and originally conceived by Mark Hoofnagle. We'll also explore how unconscious biases can lead to those characteristics. Subtitles available: English, Slovenian, Portuguese
About Denial101x:
Climate change is real, so why the controversy and debate? Learn to make sense of the science and to respond to climate change denial in Denial101x, a MOOC from UQx and edX. Denial101x isn’t just a climate MOOC; it’s a MOOC about how people think about climate change.
Comments on our channel are turned off. To discuss our videos, enrol at edx.org/understanding-climate-denial and join us in the edX discussion forum.
References for this video:
Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond?. The European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2-4. eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/eurpub/19/1/2.full.pdf
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147-174. climateinterpreter.org/sites/default/files/resources/Kahan,%20Jenkins-Smith%20and%20Braman%202010%20-%20Cultural%20cognition%20of%20scientific%20consensus.pdf
Plous, S. (1991). Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns - do accidents make us safer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1058-1082. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00459.x/abstract
Talisse, R., & Aikin, S. F. (2006). Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation, 20(3), 345-352. communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/two_forms_of_the_straw_man.pdf
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1021-1032. climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/Smith%20and%20Leiserowitz_Rise%20of%20GW%20Skepticism.pdf
Find out about the Five Characteristics of Science Denial, as outlined by Pascal Diethelm and Martin McKee, and originally conceived by Mark Hoofnagle. We'll also explore how unconscious biases can lead to those characteristics. Subtitles available: English, Slovenian, Portuguese
About Denial101x:
Climate change is real, so why the controversy and debate? Learn to make sense of the science and to respond to climate change denial in Denial101x, a MOOC from UQx and edX. Denial101x isn’t just a climate MOOC; it’s a MOOC about how people think about climate change.
Comments on our channel are turned off. To discuss our videos, enrol at edx.org/understanding-climate-denial and join us in the edX discussion forum.
References for this video:
Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond?. The European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2-4. eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/eurpub/19/1/2.full.pdf
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147-174. climateinterpreter.org/sites/default/files/resources/Kahan,%20Jenkins-Smith%20and%20Braman%202010%20-%20Cultural%20cognition%20of%20scientific%20consensus.pdf
Plous, S. (1991). Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns - do accidents make us safer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1058-1082. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00459.x/abstract
Talisse, R., & Aikin, S. F. (2006). Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation, 20(3), 345-352. communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/two_forms_of_the_straw_man.pdf
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1021-1032. climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/Smith%20and%20Leiserowitz_Rise%20of%20GW%20Skepticism.pdf
