Under Oath: EPA Agrees Margin of Safety Needed For Fluoride @fluoridealert
Under Oath: EPA Agrees Margin of Safety Needed For Fluoride  @fluoridealert
Uploaded March 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Attorney Michael Connett explains deposition footage from the fluoride lawsuit in which EPA expert witness, risk assessor Dr. Stanley Barone, admits under oath that an uncertainly factor (or margin of safety) of at least ten is needed to protect vulnerable populations from the risk of fluoride neurotoxicity.

"Genetics plays a really important role in how people respond to fluoride. Here's what we don't know... we don't know who has that genetic polymorphism that's going to make them more vulnerable. No one knows. And you know who else doesn't know... the government. We just know that there is a broad variability in how people respond to fluoride. And given that, we need to have a margin of safety to protect those who are more vulnerable" - Michael Connett

Recorded Feb 2025 By Fluoride Free New Zealand
Under Oath: EPA Agrees Margin of Safety Needed For FluorideThe Dutch Rejection of Water Fluoridation - Rick NorthFluoride Fundamentals #5: Natural FluorideGame-Changing Fluoride Neurotoxicity Study #4: Till 2020FAN attorney Michael Connett gives an update on the progress of the TSCA Fluoride Lawsuit (Dec 2022)TSCA Update: Fluoride Case Has Been Cleared for Trial!CDC Oral Health Director: We Have No Safety Data on Fluoride and the BrainCDC: Fluoride Supplements Do Not Provide A Benefit For Children When Given During PregnancyWe don’t really expect that it only happens above 1.5mg/L. - Author Of Fluoride Neurotox StudiesAustin City Council Special Called Meeting on FluoridationNTP BSC Fluoride Neurotoxicity Meeting (Supplemental) - May 16, 2023Fluorides Effect On The Brain Has Been Known Since The 1930s
fluoridealert |

Under Oath: EPA Agrees Margin of Safety Needed For Fluoride

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER