Uploaded September 2026 | Updated September 2026, 54 minutes ago
WSP 15 says the first priority is not more drafting. It is to lock the factual/evidentiary spine of the 60-day request so nothing in the notice can be challenged on dates, names, roles, or what was actually said.
From the card you just supplied, Yoshikawa is the City-side person we should anchor the Aug. 27 technical/reuse meeting around, tied to the Asset Utilization Promotion side. Shirosaki Hiroshi is a different role and should not be treated as the project lead.
So Priority 1 is:
Build the verified “decision record” for Aug. 25 → Aug. 27 → Aug. 29 → Aug. 31 → Sept. 2–4.
For each event we lock:
date/time → place → attendees → official title/department → what was presented → what City/Prefecture said → evidence source → what we may safely claim publicly.
Once that is locked, we immediately derive the one-page YUMORI.me 60-day postponement notice from it.
The reason this ranks first under WSP 15: today’s notice and dossier depend on credibility. If the chronology is exact, the economic and PPP/PFI argument lands much harder. If a date, role, or quote is wrong, City Hall can dismiss the whole package on the easiest technicality.
So the immediate first action is: finish the verified chronology and stakeholder table, starting with Sano + Yoshikawa + the Aug. 27 meeting. Then the notice.
WSP 15 says the first priority is not more drafting. It is to lock the factual/evidentiary spine of the 60-day request so nothing in the notice can be challenged on dates, names, roles, or what was actually said.
From the card you just supplied, Yoshikawa is the City-side person we should anchor the Aug. 27 technical/reuse meeting around, tied to the Asset Utilization Promotion side. Shirosaki Hiroshi is a different role and should not be treated as the project lead.
So Priority 1 is:
Build the verified “decision record” for Aug. 25 → Aug. 27 → Aug. 29 → Aug. 31 → Sept. 2–4.
For each event we lock:
date/time → place → attendees → official title/department → what was presented → what City/Prefecture said → evidence source → what we may safely claim publicly.
Once that is locked, we immediately derive the one-page YUMORI.me 60-day postponement notice from it.
The reason this ranks first under WSP 15: today’s notice and dossier depend on credibility. If the chronology is exact, the economic and PPP/PFI argument lands much harder. If a date, role, or quote is wrong, City Hall can dismiss the whole package on the easiest technicality.
So the immediate first action is: finish the verified chronology and stakeholder table, starting with Sano + Yoshikawa + the Aug. 27 meeting. Then the notice.
