Two Questions per "Side" @heathcarmody2867

Heath Carmody | Two Questions per "Side" @heathcarmody2867 | Uploaded April 2023 | Updated October 2024, 5 hours ago.
For B Flat and Bobby Shaft. A clear example of a "strong" inferior mirage (I think?). Two questions each that shouldn't require any additional context to answer. Thanks for your consideration.

Of course everyone is welcome to give their answers/explanations in the comments.

$Refraction Rainbow! Sort of.$ $High Treefraction Time Lapse (4K)$ $12 km Observation - Camera Movement has me Stumped! First observation from this location for the season. The water level needs to be high enough that Im not looking over miles of beach. Bizarre weather this season making it very difficult to do observations or much of anything really. More on the weather and details from this location in the next video. A short, wider angle time lapse from 6 feet followed by a few hours of footage from 5 inches. Trying to use a closer foreground object (old uprooted stump) as a reference to detect full frame camera movement. Low camera set up on a rock and shouldnt have gradually moved, but there was some noticable movement of the frame anyway. Very distorted refraction and hard to see all day even with some cloud cover. Still remained a black swan the entire sequence with no obstruction below eye level. Thoughts?$

$1 Hour of Raw Footage from 12 KM Observation Point #7 This is the last hour of a six hour observation on October 15th. This was distance offset optical test attempt 4 of 5, so far. I only edited out a few minutes here and there, and removed the audio for now. Ill eventually make a shorter video of the highlights, along with some thoughts on what I think is causing the later mirage effects. This was the most active refraction portion of the observation. There was a good range of inferior mirage/obstruction, which gradually transitioned to this final mix of inferior mirage and looming. Ill eventually put more detailed info in the comments, along with timestamps of interesting events.$

$Flat vs. Concave (Black Swan Comparison) This is a rough comparison of an observation against a flat geometric prediction. There is no comparison to a convex surface globe model in this video. In this case we are measuring upward displacement caused by downward refraction over an assumed flat plane water surface, and the apparent height limit that this effect was occurring. This is a typical black swan observation, where the water surface appears concave (rising up with distance) from lower elevations. There is considerable compression, miraging and distortion, but no obstruction. Nothing can be obstructed above eye level, although targets can be compressed and visually obscured beyond recognition. Ive been working on this video off and on since March 19th (Shelter Bay observation #3) and I keep going back to make things more accurate as I confirm heights and remeasure everything. Still, I cant guarantee the accuracy of this analysis. Its a good starting point and Im confident that everything is close, but Im also open to any suggestions for getting more accurate results. At some point Ill provide a more detailed look at how I determined the rough heights of everything.$

$Shelter Bay Observation #11 - 2 Camera Time Synced Time Lapse Trying something different since I have hours and hours of footage that I think is mildly interesting, but hard to make an actual meaningful video with. Observation #11 was one of my most active refraction days from all the elevations that I recorded from. It was a hot, sunny day reaching about 25°C with the water around 11°C. This footage is also from the same day as In-Ferry-Or Mirage Day 11 for further reference. And also the spinning wet ball short video. Theres a few key points to notice in the footage and discuss in the comments. 1: The lower camera (small frame) only features obstruction of the land when there is one or more inferior mirages present. Something consistent with 95% of my observations. 2. The higher camera never shows actual obstruction of the land (besides occasionally with inferior mirage) even though some should be hidden from this height. Instead, the visible water line fluctuates more with the mirage and often appears far more distant than the land. 3. The mirage effects dont always seem to coincide from the different heights, not that they necessarily should. 4. We see too much too often with complicated and unpredictable mirage conditions. Even with strong close inferior mirage, we see too much above the fold line except for early when the mirage is strongest (and most consistent). You may want to mute the video if you dont like dark ambient background music. I had some in my library that I could never find a suitable video for. Somehow I think it works with the tree refraction and certain things going on, although it makes an otherwise beautiful sunny Sunday seem more like an apocalyptic nightmare. Its music Id loosely associate with the term looming. If you want more detailed information on the observation, just ask in the comments, or wait for the target info video, for anyone serious about proving anything with observations over water. Including proving that they cant prove anything.$