Uploaded March 2018 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Matt Rogers, researcher, skywatcher, whatever. Just the usual really, the title says it all. Seems to be getting worse not better, the conspiracy theories just get more and more outlandish.
CREDITS:
Victor Trofimov
Bernard Dagenais
Michael Gaida
Paul Ellis
Judith Hall
NASA
Ralph Richter
Anne Muir
Danny McNeal
Crystalinks
S. Kasugai
George Rose
Bart Schaneman
British Pathe News
The Met Office
Metabunk
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Embarrassment" by Madness
“Dear Mr Fantasy” by Traffic
"Smoke on the Water" by Deep Purple
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Matt Rogers, researcher, skywatcher, whatever. Just the usual really, the title says it all. Seems to be getting worse not better, the conspiracy theories just get more and more outlandish.
CREDITS:
Victor Trofimov
Bernard Dagenais
Michael Gaida
Paul Ellis
Judith Hall
NASA
Ralph Richter
Anne Muir
Danny McNeal
Crystalinks
S. Kasugai
George Rose
Bart Schaneman
British Pathe News
The Met Office
Metabunk
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Embarrassment" by Madness
“Dear Mr Fantasy” by Traffic
"Smoke on the Water" by Deep Purple
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
