Uploaded January 2018 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
What can I say? More complete crap from the Master of Misinformation! His head's in the clouds - pity his brain isn't!
CREDITS:
The Met Office UK
Wikimedia
australiasevereweather.com
metabunk.com
archive.org
earthsky.org
Chris Walker
hathitrust.org
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Embarrasment" by Madness
"I Can See Clearly Now" by Jimmy Cliff
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
What can I say? More complete crap from the Master of Misinformation! His head's in the clouds - pity his brain isn't!
CREDITS:
The Met Office UK
Wikimedia
australiasevereweather.com
metabunk.com
archive.org
earthsky.org
Chris Walker
hathitrust.org
MUSIC CREDITS:
"Embarrasment" by Madness
"I Can See Clearly Now" by Jimmy Cliff
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
