Uploaded August 2022 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Did Watchtower just admit corruption by their former leader Theodore Jaracz?
Or is my gut feeling out of order?
It seem to me that Jehovah Witnesses dropped a piece of damaging information, as a way to prevent future embarresment. A lot of former Jehovah Witnesses have been speculating if Theodore Jaracz is mentioned in the secret archive.... I dont want to jump to conclusions, but there must be a reason WHY the Watchtower chose to pay 4000usd as a daily fine rather then obey the law and publish the secret archive.
If the rumours about Ted Jaracz are true, and Watchtower know the information will come to light, then leaking the information already now will be a good strategi of damage controll.
It fits Watchtowers modus operandi to drop damaging information together with A LOT of confusing information in a way to long segment. What do you think?
Information about the Lopez V. Watchtower case:
caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1731903.html
Support my activism on Patreon:
patreon.com/user?u=21842830
Or use my paypal acount:
jonasiwona@hotmail.com
Twitter: twitter.com/JonasSkogstroll
Follow me on facebook:
facebook.com/goatlikepersonality
Instagram:
instagram.com/goatlike_personality
My farms homepage:
www.slettvollgard.no
Did Watchtower just admit corruption by their former leader Theodore Jaracz?
Or is my gut feeling out of order?
It seem to me that Jehovah Witnesses dropped a piece of damaging information, as a way to prevent future embarresment. A lot of former Jehovah Witnesses have been speculating if Theodore Jaracz is mentioned in the secret archive.... I dont want to jump to conclusions, but there must be a reason WHY the Watchtower chose to pay 4000usd as a daily fine rather then obey the law and publish the secret archive.
If the rumours about Ted Jaracz are true, and Watchtower know the information will come to light, then leaking the information already now will be a good strategi of damage controll.
It fits Watchtowers modus operandi to drop damaging information together with A LOT of confusing information in a way to long segment. What do you think?
Information about the Lopez V. Watchtower case:
caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1731903.html
Support my activism on Patreon:
patreon.com/user?u=21842830
Or use my paypal acount:
jonasiwona@hotmail.com
Twitter: twitter.com/JonasSkogstroll
Follow me on facebook:
facebook.com/goatlikepersonality
Instagram:
instagram.com/goatlike_personality
My farms homepage:
www.slettvollgard.no
