Uploaded April 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

---

A new panel show featuring two of my favorite atheist thinkers, Alex Malpass and Dan Linford.
In this second episode, we examine William Lane Craig's deductive version of the moral argument for God, why it fails, and how we can flip it and possibly disprove God. We note how prominent thinkers such as Richard Dawkins, Michael Ruse, and Peter van Inawagen are misquoted to support the moral argument and how it ignores thousands of years of discussion in philosophy.
Koons paper is here: https://faculty.georgetown.edu/koonsj/papers/Euthyphro.pdf
A timeline is below:
0:00 preview
0:16 introduction
1:31 The moral argument against God
6:48 PhilPapers survey
11:05 moral compass
22:39 misquoting Dawkins
23:35 Jesus gets it wrong
33:49 Euthyro dilemma
41:33 Animals
52:23 misquoting Michael Ruse
54:09 moral theories
1:01:40 Neither objective nor subjective ?
1:03:53 Swiburn'es criqitue of the moral argument
1:12:48 misquoting Van Inwagen

We've now set up a facebook page here: facebook.com/groups/994473845741616/?ref=share_group_link&mibextid=wwXIfr&rdid=46MWMO2CqxFVvIiN&share_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fshare%2Fg%2F15rmAnMGZP%2F%3Fmibextid%3DwwXIfr