Uploaded December 2020 | Updated September 2026, 1 minute ago
The intervention point: Collective initiatives for the left in Europe
Inputs:
Javier Moreno, Assistant Professor of Communication & Project Manager in Fundación por la Europa de los Ciudadanos (Spain)
David Pestieau, Deputy Chairman of PtB (Belgium)
Katalin Gennburg, Member of the Berlin Parliament for Die Linke
Sophie Binet, Co-Secretary - CGT executives (France)
Deborah James (Director of International Programs, Center for Economic and Policy Research & Coordinator of ‘Our World Is Not for Sale‘)
Patrice Leclerc, Mayor of Gennevilliers with PCF (France)
Moderator: Cornelia Hildebrandt, Co – President of Transform! Europe See less
*****************
The annual seminar of transform! europe and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation around strategic questions for the radical left in Europe was held in the context of the European Forum.
The aim of the seminar is to deepen knowledge of the specific obstacles and the difficulties around the transnational organisation and cooperation of the left, and, to improve the capacity of our forces for political action and organisation. The cardinal challenge is how the European left can effectively intervene and promote a policy change considering the social, economic and political consequences of the corona pandemic and the limited capacity, or better willingness, for action of the European Union.
The pandemic crisis accelerated global developments that were already present. These developments are complex and highly contradictory. Key demands of the left, such as the cancellation of the debt, suddenly became possible. The digitalisation of labour, education, cultural expression, and human interaction in general is being pushed forward, creating new forms of subjectification. Moreover, the welfare state was neither strengthened nor upheld. The inadequate health care systems had to make painful decisions to ration care, and the poor continued to be the victims of capitalism’s structural inequality.
European integration is undergoing its most serious crisis, with the EU unable to react and act as a collective subject, instead of solidarity and unity, each country is on its own. This only points up how hegemonic the frugal and austerity-inspired dogma of the EU still is, regardless of its manifest failure. Democracy is no longer a compelling principle in the EU, and welfare states are outloawed by the very Constitution of the EU. What remains of the Union after the crisis?What would be the point at which the left might intervene? Where do we stand vis-à-vis the corona pandemic? Are we better prepared than we were for the 2008 crisis? How can we build common projects at the European level?
The intervention point: Collective initiatives for the left in Europe
Inputs:
Javier Moreno, Assistant Professor of Communication & Project Manager in Fundación por la Europa de los Ciudadanos (Spain)
David Pestieau, Deputy Chairman of PtB (Belgium)
Katalin Gennburg, Member of the Berlin Parliament for Die Linke
Sophie Binet, Co-Secretary - CGT executives (France)
Deborah James (Director of International Programs, Center for Economic and Policy Research & Coordinator of ‘Our World Is Not for Sale‘)
Patrice Leclerc, Mayor of Gennevilliers with PCF (France)
Moderator: Cornelia Hildebrandt, Co – President of Transform! Europe See less
*****************
The annual seminar of transform! europe and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation around strategic questions for the radical left in Europe was held in the context of the European Forum.
The aim of the seminar is to deepen knowledge of the specific obstacles and the difficulties around the transnational organisation and cooperation of the left, and, to improve the capacity of our forces for political action and organisation. The cardinal challenge is how the European left can effectively intervene and promote a policy change considering the social, economic and political consequences of the corona pandemic and the limited capacity, or better willingness, for action of the European Union.
The pandemic crisis accelerated global developments that were already present. These developments are complex and highly contradictory. Key demands of the left, such as the cancellation of the debt, suddenly became possible. The digitalisation of labour, education, cultural expression, and human interaction in general is being pushed forward, creating new forms of subjectification. Moreover, the welfare state was neither strengthened nor upheld. The inadequate health care systems had to make painful decisions to ration care, and the poor continued to be the victims of capitalism’s structural inequality.
European integration is undergoing its most serious crisis, with the EU unable to react and act as a collective subject, instead of solidarity and unity, each country is on its own. This only points up how hegemonic the frugal and austerity-inspired dogma of the EU still is, regardless of its manifest failure. Democracy is no longer a compelling principle in the EU, and welfare states are outloawed by the very Constitution of the EU. What remains of the Union after the crisis?What would be the point at which the left might intervene? Where do we stand vis-à-vis the corona pandemic? Are we better prepared than we were for the 2008 crisis? How can we build common projects at the European level?





![Press Conference :: The Happy Few, a study on the financialisation of elderly care.
transform! europe, has commissioned a team of researchers on an investigation of how investment funds and other financial actors are taking over elderly care homes all around the European Union. The report presented in the webinar is entitled The Happy Few: How European Elderly Care Has Been Financialised, How Benefits From It, and Which Counterstrategies To Deploy. It builds on an impressive European-wide collaboration between eight researchers, mapping the way financial corporations have been taking over the elderly care sector in six countries (France, Sweden, Germany, Spain, Croatia, and Portugal).
The report makes three crucial points: 1) the financialisation of elderly care is spreading, 2) it is dangerous for patients and care workers, 3) but it is not an inevitable trend. Even though it happens in many countries at the same time, it is driven by a small number of very large groups located in 2-3 countries, that spread financial logics all around Europe in a top-down manner. It can be countered by deploying activist strategies against these actors at the European level, and we map the successful strategies that have already been experimented in particular countries.
The presentation of this study to journalists and broader audience took place online on the 11th of Spetember with Théo Bourgeron (coordinator of the study), Ayoze Alfageme Ramirez (one of the authors and co-responsible for the analysis of the Spanish case) and Cornelia Hildebrandt (co-vice president of transform! europe). The webinar was moderated by Tatiana Moutinho (facilitator of transform! europe).
The study is available for download on transform! europe website [https://transform-network.net/publication/the-happy-few-how-european-elderly-care-has-been-financialised-how-benefits-from-it-and-which-counterstrategies-to-deploy/] Press Conference :: The Happy Few, a study on the financialisation of elderly care.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_dCxi5YS9oY/mqdefault.jpg)




