The problem with discrete approximation to integrals or probability densities @SpartacanUsuals
The problem with discrete approximation to integrals or probability densities  @SpartacanUsuals
Uploaded May 2018 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
One solution to approximating high dimensional integrals involves discretising. These approaches involve approximating a continuous function as a discrete function, with a finite set of values at particular points. This video explains the issue inherent with this approach to doing approximate Bayesian inference.

This video is part of a lecture course which closely follows the material covered in the book, "A Student's Guide to Bayesian Statistics", published by Sage, which is available to order on Amazon here: amazon.co.uk/Students-Guide-Bayesian-Statistics/dp/1473916364

For more information on all things Bayesian, have a look at: ben-lambert.com/bayesian/. The playlist for the lecture course is here: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwJRxp3blEvZ8AKMXOy0fc0cqT61GsKCG&disable_polymer=true
The problem with discrete approximation to integrals or probability densitiesHow to derive a Gibbs sampling routine in generalDerivation of variance-covariance matrix in factor analysis - part 2Factor analysis: predicted variance and covariance of indicators - part 1Monte Carlo Simulation of Omitted Variable Bias in Least SquaresMonte Carlo Simulation for Ordinary Least SquaresHow to code up a bespoke probability density in StanMaximum likelihood estimation of factor analysis models - part 2Why we typically use dependent sampling to sample from the posteriorAn introduction to the Poisson distribution - 2Score test (Lagrange Multiplier test) - introductionRepresenting heteroscedasticity in matrix form
Ben Lambert |

The problem with discrete approximation to integrals or probability densities

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER