Uploaded December 2011 | Updated September 2026, 6 hours ago
This video is a follow up to this video:
"The Argument's Logical Jim but Not as We Know It"
youtube.com/watch?v=bEI2x_8C19U
In a turn of events that took only the intellectually challenged by surprise, Chad Elliott, the Atheist Killa didn't agree with the overall premise of my last video and he made a video response to me.
He has posted his reply as a video response down below but if he has retracted it by the time you see it you can find it here:
"THE QUESTION PAULCHARTLEY WONT ANSWER"
youtube.com/watch?v=hgTYJm1tcnA
You won't be shocked to find out that Chad denies that I have defeated his argument and he claims that I would not answer an important question which is:
"HOW"" DOES SOMETHING ETERNAL, SPACELESS, IMMATERIAL, AND DOESNT EXIST ANYWHERE, CREATE OUR "PHYSICAL UNIVERSE?"
Now my third option is that the universe came into existence all by itself without a cause or a creator so I fail to understand how I can show him where the cause is when I am saying that there isn't one.
I contend that this is a complete and utter failure to comprehend basic English on his part and that contrary to his insistence that he has not asked me an unanswerable question, this question cannot be answered by me because it is a question about Chads proposed argument and not mine.
He makes a whole fifteen minute video about how I will not tell him what caused a causeless universe which in my book is self ownage on a grand and epic scale.
In this video I ask him to explain a couple of the more hilarious moments in his masterful moronic monologue and I clearly show that I have answered the question he says that I haven't in a logical, accurate and detailed way several times and I once again restate exactly what my proposed third option to his argument is and I challenge him to demonstrate that it does not defeat his argument.
He has all of the information that he needs to do this without needing me to answer questions that are designed to trip me up so he can claim that I am proposing something that I am not
And yes, he still insists in writing in block capitals
This video is a follow up to this video:
"The Argument's Logical Jim but Not as We Know It"
youtube.com/watch?v=bEI2x_8C19U
In a turn of events that took only the intellectually challenged by surprise, Chad Elliott, the Atheist Killa didn't agree with the overall premise of my last video and he made a video response to me.
He has posted his reply as a video response down below but if he has retracted it by the time you see it you can find it here:
"THE QUESTION PAULCHARTLEY WONT ANSWER"
youtube.com/watch?v=hgTYJm1tcnA
You won't be shocked to find out that Chad denies that I have defeated his argument and he claims that I would not answer an important question which is:
"HOW"" DOES SOMETHING ETERNAL, SPACELESS, IMMATERIAL, AND DOESNT EXIST ANYWHERE, CREATE OUR "PHYSICAL UNIVERSE?"
Now my third option is that the universe came into existence all by itself without a cause or a creator so I fail to understand how I can show him where the cause is when I am saying that there isn't one.
I contend that this is a complete and utter failure to comprehend basic English on his part and that contrary to his insistence that he has not asked me an unanswerable question, this question cannot be answered by me because it is a question about Chads proposed argument and not mine.
He makes a whole fifteen minute video about how I will not tell him what caused a causeless universe which in my book is self ownage on a grand and epic scale.
In this video I ask him to explain a couple of the more hilarious moments in his masterful moronic monologue and I clearly show that I have answered the question he says that I haven't in a logical, accurate and detailed way several times and I once again restate exactly what my proposed third option to his argument is and I challenge him to demonstrate that it does not defeat his argument.
He has all of the information that he needs to do this without needing me to answer questions that are designed to trip me up so he can claim that I am proposing something that I am not
And yes, he still insists in writing in block capitals
