The Kalam Cosmological Argument Fails | Alex Malpass @mileskdonahue
The Kalam Cosmological Argument Fails | Alex Malpass  @mileskdonahue
Uploaded September 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Alex Malpass, former lecturer in philosophy at the University of Bristol become software engineer, joins me to debate the kalam cosmological argument: the argument that because the universe began to exist, there must be a Creator that brought it into being. Malpass is one of the most articulate and careful critics of the argument, so it was a pleasure to discuss it with him.

"All the Time in the World," Alex's paper discussing the 'successive addition argument' against an infinite past: philpapers.org/rec/MALATT-2

A list of Alex's publications: philpeople.org/profiles/alex-malpass

Alex's blog with loads of good philosophical content: useofreason.wordpress.com

00:00 - Introduction
05:41 - "Everything the begins to exist has a cause."
23:56 - "The universe began to exist."
24:23 - First philosophical argument for a beginning of the universe.
54:26 - Second philosophical argument for a beginning of the universe.
01:17:38 - "If the universe has a cause, then a transcendent, personal Creator exists."
The Kalam Cosmological Argument Fails | Alex MalpassWhy Belief in the Soul Makes SenseFine-Tuning is Evidence for God | Tom RudeliusThis is Why Morality Doesnt Exist | Matt LutzMy Experience Debating William Lane Craig - Philip GoffCould God Deceive Us? #evil #atheism #problemofevilA Physicist Explains Fine-TuningThis is What Quantum Mechanics Actually SaysThe Fine-Tuning Argument is Better Than I Thought - Joe SchmidWhy the BEST Argument for God Succeeds | A Reply to @unsolicitedadvice9198Are Gay Relationships Dangerous? A Reply to William Lane CraigAtheists Can Believe in Morality Too | Erik Wielenberg
Miles K. Donahue |

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Fails | Alex Malpass

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER