Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
In March of 2026, the Temple Gun Club, along with three of its members, filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), the federal ban on possessing machine guns that were not possessed prior to May 19, 1986.
TGC argues that Congress exceeded its limited, enumerated powers when it enacted § 922(o). The law criminalizes mere possession of machine guns without any connection to interstate commerce or to any other constitutional grant of federal authority. They seek a declaration that § 922(o) is unconstitutional and a permanent injunction preventing its enforcement against TGC and its members.
The individual Plaintiffs, represented by the Center for the American Future at the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), are law-abiding Texans, including a U.S. Army veteran, a federally licensed gunsmith, and a firearms enthusiast who has been shooting since childhood. Each Plaintiff legally owns firearms that could be converted into machine guns and wish to acquire or manufacture a post-1986 machine gun. The federal ban prevents them from exercising that right despite their eligibility to possess such firearms under the National Firearms Act (“NFA”).
The lawsuit also asks the court to reconsider the Fifth Circuit’s 1997 decision in United States v. Knutson, which upheld § 922(o) under the Commerce Clause. Since Knutson was decided, several Fifth Circuit judges have questioned whether federal firearm possession bans comport with constitutional limits on federal power. Most recently, Judge Don Willett authored a concurrence in United States v. Wilson that called for Knutson to be reconsidered.
Read more about the case (Temple Gun Club v. Bondi): texaspolicy.com/temple-gun-club-v-bondi
Subscribe on Apple: podcasts.apple.com/podcast/rightly-decided/id1880106579
Subscribe on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/26BwaBrD9pEOvfzi906sCe
The Center for the American Future defends the Constitution through legal opposition to government overreach. The Center launches legal challenges at the administrative, district, and appellate court levels on behalf of ordinary people whose lives, liberty, and property are threatened by government action in defiance of the Constitution.
Website: texaspolicy.com/initiatives/center-for-the-american-future
X: twitter.com/LitigateLiberty
In March of 2026, the Temple Gun Club, along with three of its members, filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), the federal ban on possessing machine guns that were not possessed prior to May 19, 1986.
TGC argues that Congress exceeded its limited, enumerated powers when it enacted § 922(o). The law criminalizes mere possession of machine guns without any connection to interstate commerce or to any other constitutional grant of federal authority. They seek a declaration that § 922(o) is unconstitutional and a permanent injunction preventing its enforcement against TGC and its members.
The individual Plaintiffs, represented by the Center for the American Future at the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), are law-abiding Texans, including a U.S. Army veteran, a federally licensed gunsmith, and a firearms enthusiast who has been shooting since childhood. Each Plaintiff legally owns firearms that could be converted into machine guns and wish to acquire or manufacture a post-1986 machine gun. The federal ban prevents them from exercising that right despite their eligibility to possess such firearms under the National Firearms Act (“NFA”).
The lawsuit also asks the court to reconsider the Fifth Circuit’s 1997 decision in United States v. Knutson, which upheld § 922(o) under the Commerce Clause. Since Knutson was decided, several Fifth Circuit judges have questioned whether federal firearm possession bans comport with constitutional limits on federal power. Most recently, Judge Don Willett authored a concurrence in United States v. Wilson that called for Knutson to be reconsidered.
Read more about the case (Temple Gun Club v. Bondi): texaspolicy.com/temple-gun-club-v-bondi
Subscribe on Apple: podcasts.apple.com/podcast/rightly-decided/id1880106579
Subscribe on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/26BwaBrD9pEOvfzi906sCe
The Center for the American Future defends the Constitution through legal opposition to government overreach. The Center launches legal challenges at the administrative, district, and appellate court levels on behalf of ordinary people whose lives, liberty, and property are threatened by government action in defiance of the Constitution.
Website: texaspolicy.com/initiatives/center-for-the-american-future
X: twitter.com/LitigateLiberty
