efilism | The Efilist's Conceit @efilism | Uploaded March 2023 | Updated October 2024, 50 minutes ago.
One of the hallmarks of efilism is efilists passing off their personal subjective values as insuperable objective truth. Here's the chain of "logic": Disagreeing with an efilist = disagreeing with objective truth ∴ disagreeing with an efilist is grounded in fallacious reasoning. The intent is to gaslight heretics into believing that disagreeing with efilists is the same as being illogical and irrational, meaning efilists are justified in dismissing objections out of hand. Quite a claim in light of the fact efilism itself is grounded on fallacious reasoning youtube.com/post/UgkxwmyZz0WdpqAQRvk3vrhOdMgcQ0tqHaQV
In this video efilist Danny @efilwv1635 from @TheRightToNoLongerExist showcases this approach by framing opposing personal values as logical fallacies in order to avoid having to grapple with them in good faith.
The problem for efilists is having to maintain the pretense their subjective values are on a par with objective truth. Acknowledging otherwise would force them to concede their subjective worldview is on an equal footing with all other subjective worldviews. That would undermine their claim to supremacy of thought/insight/ethics, which would in turn undermine efilism.
Full Context Source
youtu.be/GH7mIPqH0Hc
#shorts
efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalism
One of the hallmarks of efilism is efilists passing off their personal subjective values as insuperable objective truth. Here's the chain of "logic": Disagreeing with an efilist = disagreeing with objective truth ∴ disagreeing with an efilist is grounded in fallacious reasoning. The intent is to gaslight heretics into believing that disagreeing with efilists is the same as being illogical and irrational, meaning efilists are justified in dismissing objections out of hand. Quite a claim in light of the fact efilism itself is grounded on fallacious reasoning youtube.com/post/UgkxwmyZz0WdpqAQRvk3vrhOdMgcQ0tqHaQV
In this video efilist Danny @efilwv1635 from @TheRightToNoLongerExist showcases this approach by framing opposing personal values as logical fallacies in order to avoid having to grapple with them in good faith.
The problem for efilists is having to maintain the pretense their subjective values are on a par with objective truth. Acknowledging otherwise would force them to concede their subjective worldview is on an equal footing with all other subjective worldviews. That would undermine their claim to supremacy of thought/insight/ethics, which would in turn undermine efilism.
Full Context Source
youtu.be/GH7mIPqH0Hc
#shorts
efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalism
