Uploaded September 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 152) - Tempo I - Tranquillo - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Andante sostenuto (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Tempo I: 11:29
III - Vivace scherzando e con grazia (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Pesante: 19:56
IV - Allegro con spirito e giocoso (𝅗𝅥 = 120) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Animato - (𝅗𝅥 = 96) - (𝅗𝅥 = 108) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Tranquillo - Animato - (𝅗𝅥 = 120) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - (𝅗𝅥 = 96) - (𝅗𝅥 = 108) - Grazioso - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Molto allegro (quasi doppio movimento) e sempre più animato al fine: 22:56
Gernsheim's Symphony No.3 was composed between August 9 and October 26 of 1895. It was premiered in Mainz on January 22 of 1896, performed by the Mainz City Orchestra conducted by Gernsheim himself. In 1896 the Berlin Philharmonic and its famous conductor Arthur Nikisch also took up the work, which made a strong impression even on a composer of completely different leanings: Richard Strauss. The symphony was soon played in cities such as Cologne, Bonn and Frankfurt.
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own.
Gernsheim's biographer Karl Holl has the following to say about the piece: "In his Fourth Symphony, Gernsheim seems to have achieved the late crystallization of his memories of youth. There is no reason to doubt this." Because credit for many of the details in Holl’s biographical account is due to Gernsheim’s wife (and probably to him as well), there is indeed no reason to doubt this. It is not difficult to consider the various movements as depictions of mood from his youth, but none of the sources offer any further programmatic content, unlike the third symphony.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a rhythmic main theme in B-flat major, introduced in a series of piano-forte dynamic contrasts between strings and full orchestra. After reaching a fortissisimo climax and a transition, a lyrical second theme in F major is exposed by cellos and violas. The music reaches a vigorous climax before gracefully leading to the more dramatic development section. Fragments of the material are transformed and the music modulates through several keys. The main themes are then recapitulated, ending the allegro with a victorious coda.
The second movement is also written in sonata form. It opens with a widely lyrical main theme in E-flat major, presented by the clarinet in piano over horns and strings, before passing onto full orchestra in a romantic way. The second theme is more rhythmic and solemn, before a transition leads to a development with harmonic twists and passages that seem to invoke the influence of Mahler. The material is then recapitulated in a varied manner. A gentle coda ends the andante sostenuto with a nostalgic tone.
The third movement is a very compact scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a graceful main theme in B-flat major, presented in piano between strings and woods before reaching a short fortissimo climax. The trio quickly follows with a melodic second theme in G minor, with a certain melancholic touch. The main theme of the scherzo is then recapitulated with a varied orchestration, culminating in another fortissimo tutti climax. The movement ends with a light, almost playful pianissimo coda.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It opens with a deceptive G major series of chords, leading to a rhythmic and vivacious main theme in B-flat major, fully exposed by the horns in forte over strings pizzicati. A transition leads to the lyrical and cantabile second theme in F major, introduced by strings before passing onto clarinet and then full orchestra. The ensuing development mainly focuses on the main theme, subjected to modulations and even more accented rhythms. After reaching a fortissimo climax and a transition, the material is recapitulated. Rushing ascending string figures and brass fanfares lead us to a triumphal coda with which the symphony ends.
Picture: "Flaming June" (1895) by the British painter Sir Frederic Leighton.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2b8rp574 and tinyurl.com/2aeu533m
To check the score: tinyurl.com/22hvgx5g
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 152) - Tempo I - Tranquillo - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Andante sostenuto (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Tempo I: 11:29
III - Vivace scherzando e con grazia (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Pesante: 19:56
IV - Allegro con spirito e giocoso (𝅗𝅥 = 120) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Animato - (𝅗𝅥 = 96) - (𝅗𝅥 = 108) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Tranquillo - Animato - (𝅗𝅥 = 120) - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - (𝅗𝅥 = 96) - (𝅗𝅥 = 108) - Grazioso - (𝅗𝅥 = 104) - Molto allegro (quasi doppio movimento) e sempre più animato al fine: 22:56
Gernsheim's Symphony No.3 was composed between August 9 and October 26 of 1895. It was premiered in Mainz on January 22 of 1896, performed by the Mainz City Orchestra conducted by Gernsheim himself. In 1896 the Berlin Philharmonic and its famous conductor Arthur Nikisch also took up the work, which made a strong impression even on a composer of completely different leanings: Richard Strauss. The symphony was soon played in cities such as Cologne, Bonn and Frankfurt.
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own.
Gernsheim's biographer Karl Holl has the following to say about the piece: "In his Fourth Symphony, Gernsheim seems to have achieved the late crystallization of his memories of youth. There is no reason to doubt this." Because credit for many of the details in Holl’s biographical account is due to Gernsheim’s wife (and probably to him as well), there is indeed no reason to doubt this. It is not difficult to consider the various movements as depictions of mood from his youth, but none of the sources offer any further programmatic content, unlike the third symphony.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a rhythmic main theme in B-flat major, introduced in a series of piano-forte dynamic contrasts between strings and full orchestra. After reaching a fortissisimo climax and a transition, a lyrical second theme in F major is exposed by cellos and violas. The music reaches a vigorous climax before gracefully leading to the more dramatic development section. Fragments of the material are transformed and the music modulates through several keys. The main themes are then recapitulated, ending the allegro with a victorious coda.
The second movement is also written in sonata form. It opens with a widely lyrical main theme in E-flat major, presented by the clarinet in piano over horns and strings, before passing onto full orchestra in a romantic way. The second theme is more rhythmic and solemn, before a transition leads to a development with harmonic twists and passages that seem to invoke the influence of Mahler. The material is then recapitulated in a varied manner. A gentle coda ends the andante sostenuto with a nostalgic tone.
The third movement is a very compact scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a graceful main theme in B-flat major, presented in piano between strings and woods before reaching a short fortissimo climax. The trio quickly follows with a melodic second theme in G minor, with a certain melancholic touch. The main theme of the scherzo is then recapitulated with a varied orchestration, culminating in another fortissimo tutti climax. The movement ends with a light, almost playful pianissimo coda.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It opens with a deceptive G major series of chords, leading to a rhythmic and vivacious main theme in B-flat major, fully exposed by the horns in forte over strings pizzicati. A transition leads to the lyrical and cantabile second theme in F major, introduced by strings before passing onto clarinet and then full orchestra. The ensuing development mainly focuses on the main theme, subjected to modulations and even more accented rhythms. After reaching a fortissimo climax and a transition, the material is recapitulated. Rushing ascending string figures and brass fanfares lead us to a triumphal coda with which the symphony ends.
Picture: "Flaming June" (1895) by the British painter Sir Frederic Leighton.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2b8rp574 and tinyurl.com/2aeu533m
To check the score: tinyurl.com/22hvgx5g

![Symphony No.4 in B major - George Lloyd
Philharmonia Orchestra conducted by Sir Edward Downes.
I - Allegro moderato: 0:00
II - Lento tranquillo: 17:07
III - Allegro scherzando: 29:41
IV - Lento - Allegro ma non troppo: 42:57
Lloyds Symphony No.4 was composed between 1945-6, not being premiered until much later at the Cheltenham Festival on July 13 of 1981, performed by the Philharmonia Orchestra. The composer served in World War II with the Royal Marines as a Bandsman. On board the cruiser HMS Trinidad on Arctic convoys he was one of the Bandsmen manning the Transmitting Station, which was situated deep in the hull of the ship. In 1942, during an engagement, the ship fired a faulty torpedo which travelled in a circular track and hit the ship, fracturing a large fuel oil tank. Many of Lloyds shipmates were drowned in the fuel oil, and he was the last man to escape from the compartment.
Lloyd suffered severe mental and physical trauma from the shell shock, and was hospitalized before being discharged from the Royal Marines. When the war ended, his wife took him to Switzerland. After 4 years he was well enough to start composing again, through the devotion and love of his Swiss wife, Nancy. Lloyd stated the following about the symphony: On the title page [...] I wrote ... a world of darkness, storms, strange colours and a far-away peacefulness. That for me was the Arctic; during the winter of 1941-2 I had seen some of its terrifying aspects, its violence and immensity so overwhelming that even mens barbarity to each other seemed to become less horrifying than it was. In 1945 I started to try to compose again; my impressions and experiences in the Arctic had become something of an obsession and they gradually formulated themselves into a symphony... where the music, the sea, an orchestra, my own anguish, all became mixed up together.
The first movement is written in a large-scale sonata form. It begins with a portentous timpani roll, followed by a willful main theme shared between brass, strings and woodwinds, built on a rising and falling figure and with Lloyds characteristic use of dotted rhythms. The music turns more dissonant and conflicted as the material unfolds, leading to a ferocious fortissimo climax. Then a serene and lyrical second theme provides great contrast, introduced in dialogues between strings and woodwinds. It grows into a passionate and expressive climax. The ensuing development opens with a brief reminiscence of the main theme, before the music turns increasingly agitated and tense, with a heroic brass fanfare peeking through the bleak landscape. An imposing and dissonant climax leads to the recapitulation of the main themes, separated by a bitter anticlimax. A brilliant return of the main theme ends the allegro with a victorious gesture in which the BACH motif can be heard.
The second movement is structured in ternary form, being inspired by the lanscapes of the Norwegian coast as far as the North Cape. It opens with a chilling pedal notes on strings, an ear-catching evocation of the frosty calm of the Arctic seascape, though the beauty of the place is just as forcefully conveyed as its alienating chilliness. The music gradually unfolds in an expressive manner with a melodic theme while remaining this glacial statis. Lloyd’s use of chromatic figures prevent the music from becoming too restful. The central part starts as clarinets present a lyrical second theme of romantic nature, which develops in an increasingly passionate manner until reaching a powerfully moving climax. Afterwards we return to the openings melodic theme and its icing evocation of the arctic seas. A serene coda ends the lento.
The third movement is a scherzo in rondo form (A-B-A-C-A-B-C-A). It begins with an animated and rhythmic main theme, presented by strings with deft, abrupt changes of key and an absence of heavy brass. A more melodic and fantastical second theme is presented, underlined by the rhythmic momentum of the music. After a climax, the main theme is recapitulated in a varied manner. Then a deeply lyrical and cantabile third theme is introduced by woodwinds, featuring beautiful arabesques and creating effective contrast. The balletic main theme is then recapitulated once again with slight changes, followed by the second. The third theme is recapitulated as well, with solo violin performing the arabesques instead of woodwinds. A coda based on the main material ends the scherzo-like allegro with a resolute and life-affirming coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Upscaled version of Routed North: Arctic Convoys Routed North in Summer, to the Edge of the Ice Pack, to Evade Aircraft Based in North Norway (1972-8) by John Alan Hamilton.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2ceea6a9 and https://tinyurl.com/24bx7rvr
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.4 in B major - George Lloyd](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/oBGcME6txfw/mqdefault.jpg)






![Sketches Ballet Music - Alfred Schnittke
Bolshoi Theatre Orchestra conducted by Andrey Chistiakov.
I - March The Swan, the Crab and the Pike (0:00) - Overture (1:55)- Chichikov’s Childhood (3:15) - The Portrait (5:37) - Major Kovalyov (12:02) - The Nose. [The Morning (12:45) - Loss of the Nose - Searching the Nose (14:16) - Despair (15:47) - The Nose is Found (17:39)] - The Overcoat (19:59) - Ferdinand VIII (22:15) - The Civil Servants (23:25) - The Unknown Woman. [Barrel-organ (25:54) - The Unknown Woman (28:04) - Pas de deux (29:27) - The Debauch (33:00) - Sabbath (34:28) - Barrel-organ (36:30)] - Spanish Royal March (37:39) - The Ball (39:19) - The Testament. Ukrainian Folksong (45:18) - March The Swan, the Crab and the Pike (50:36)
Schnittkes Sketches (Esquisses) was assembled on 1985, largely derived from previously written music in collaboration with Sofia Gubaidulina, Edison Denisov and Gennadi Rozhdestvensky. It was first staged in Moscow at the Bolshoi Theatre on January 16 of 1985, led by Rozhdestvensky with Andrei Petrov as the choreographer. Written in a single continuous movement, the ballet can be described as a choreographic fantasia on themes from the works of Nikolai Gogol.
In 1978, Schnittke wrote the incidental music for a production of The Inspectors Tale, an adaptation for stage of Gogol’s Dead Souls. It was to have been directed by Yuri Lyubimov, but the Soviet government banned the production. A suite was assembled from the score by Gennadi Rozhdenstvensky, and two leading colleagues of Schnittke, Gubaidulina and Denisov, contributed a jointly composed march, which opens this ballet. It was in 1985 the music was choreographed and performed at the Bolshoi. Schnittke composed a number of new pieces for this production. The characters in the action are all from Gogol, but in addition to The Dead Souls, we meet Tchitchikov, Major Kovalyov’s Nose, and Ferdinand VIII from Notes of a Madman.
Each scene is each pretty short. They’re really satirical little vignettes where wit is in solution with corrosion. The music is polystylistic, sometimes raucous in the manner of Ibert and Satie. At other times there are tasty little knockabout visits by Prokofiev and Shostakovich. Beethoven (Symphony No. 5 – Fate motif), Tchaikovsky (Swan Lake), Mozart and Chopin (Pas de deux) references are dropped and capitalised upon along the way. The harpsichord is a frequent visitor but in a slightly less intense fashion than we may be accustomed to from the use made of the instrument in Shchedrin and Weinberg. French cinema music of the 1950s and 1960s is also evoked. There’s an electric guitar (solo and bass), flexatone, piano (prepared with coins between the strings) and other percussion some of it ‘outlandish’. There’s even a Russian speaker in Ferdinand VIII. The Barrel Organ creaks and wheezes charmingly. All of this contributes to a sense of devilish mischief, which suites ideally the grotesque nature of many of Gogol’s characters.
Picture: An Englishman in Moscow (1914) by painter Kazimir Malevich
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/22dq8daf and https://tinyurl.com/2a8rzwae
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Sketches Ballet Music - Alfred Schnittke](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/p2ZFddzKmx4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Concert Piece for Oboe and Orchestra in F major - August Klughardt
Orchestra della Svizzera Italiana with HansJörg Schellenberger as both oboist and conductor.
I - Ziemlich lebhaft - Ruhig und sehr ausdrucksvoll - Lebhaft: 0:00
Klughardts Oboe concert piece (Konzerstuck) was composed circa 1870, while he was working as conductor at the court theatre in Weimar. Its premiere date and performers involved are currently unknown, its earliest performance was in a concert of the Royal Music School of Würzburg conducted by Carl Reinecke. Five years later it was played in Dresden on June 28 of 1886. Already by then, the piece was being included into standard conservatory exams or jury series. Just as Klughardts demanding Woodwind Quintet Op. 79 is still considered an excellent piece for pedagogical purposes, many considered the Konzertstück especially suitable for teaching and learning purposes.
Rudolf Hiebendahl, one of the greatest oboists of the XIX century, wrote the following note in 1886 for Klughardt: Warmest greetings and many thanks to you from an old oboe-father for the wonderful composition. Finally, our oboe repertoire, which in general is rather trivial and slim, has been greatly enriched. Further on, he noted that the composition has not only been positively recognized by the local press but as well by the world of music in general. Gunther Joppig, a well-respected expert of oboe literature, sees in Klughardt’s piece a light and highly effective work of the romantic era for oboe. The relatively small quantity of oboe literature makes the piece a particularly worthwhile addition to the repertoire, though its origins are not well documented. Even Klughardt’s biographer, Leopold Gerlach, does not mention the piece at all.
The recognition and use of the oboe had greatly changed during the XIX century. Eduard Hanslick stated in 1866: The time in which this type of artist [oboists] used to travel and appear in great numbers by performing concerts on their boring single tubes has passed. Within the context of the romantic orchestra, the oboe was assigned a great variety of responsibilities and functions, but the overall position of the oboe in the concerto repertoire remained somewhat weak. Pieces for oboe and orchestra were rather rare at the end of the XIX century. Often, people would associate the sound of the oboe with country and peasant-like images. Klughardt’s concert piece, however, is pleasantly different from this stereotype.
The piece is structured in ternary form. It begins with an animated orchestral introduction, before the oboe soloist exposes a melodic and cantabile main theme in F major in a virtuoso way. According to Christopher Fifield, is the only way for the oboe to clearly shine through the thick orchestral writing. After an orchestral march-like transition, the second theme is introduced by the soloist. Other motives and ideas are also present, offering some contrast. Orchestra and soloist share an equal role, it is the oboist who introduces the material first for the most part. A brief oboe solo recitative leads to the next part. The central section features a widely lyrical theme on oboe, which unfold with romantic expression over string accompaniment. The third section is a broad recapitulation of the first, lively and cheerful in tone, capped by a cadenza-like passage for the soloist. A short but resolute coda in F major ends the concert piece.
Picture: View of Mondsee with the Schafberg mountain (1869) by the German painter Stanislaus von Kalckreuth.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Source: https://tinyurl.com/247f5lx3
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29jxs4tu Concert Piece for Oboe and Orchestra in F major - August Klughardt](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pBax7tcwrFY/mqdefault.jpg)
