Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
BBC Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Con brio: 0:00
II - Largo: 8:12
III - Alla marcia: 18:39
IV - Andante, con malinconico: 23:30
Lloyd's Symphony No.2 was finished in March 1933, being revised much later in 1982. The first three movements were performed in March 1933, played by the Eastbourne Municipal Orchestra conducted by the composer. The first complete performance was given in January 1986 by the BBC Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by the composer, this recording being made a few days later.
Lloyd’s Second Symphony is a remarkable achievement for a 19-year-old. In terms of structure, it’s loosely based on Tchaikovsky’s Sixth, with its peppy third-movement march (its tune fully worthy of the great Russian composer) and melancholy finale (bluesy rather than hysterically despairing). More importantly, the work shows Lloyd fully in command of his own personal idiom. The orchestration is brilliant without resorting to special effects or extras. The symphony is one of Lloyd's most harmonically "modern" works in that it uses polytonality (simultaneous sounding of instrumental voices in different keys), a device he rarely used thereafter.
The first movement is structured as a sonata-rondo. It begins with a rhythmic and exhilarating main theme, shared between strings and brass. It is contrasted by a graceful and dance-like second theme introduced by oboe and pizzicato strings. The third theme is vigorously joyful and animated, with a braying Mahlerian horn-call. The ensuing development features fragments of the material, combining and transforming them while modulating through keys and engaging in rhythmic and dynamic variance. The themes are then recapitulated in a varied way, before a forceful and assertive coda closes the con brio.
The second movement is written as a theme and variations. After an evocative introduction dominated by the horn, a widely lyrical and expressive main theme is introduced by clarinets, then taken by strings. The material is then unfolded in a series of variations, initially being sinuous and darkly-coloured, underpinned by increasingly chromatic harmony. A more rhythmic and agitated passage in the central part is followed by an ornate, arabesque-style writing for solo first violin. A passionate and expressive climax is reached near the end, before the largo ends with a longing diminuendo coda.
The third movement is written in ternary form, resembling a scherzo in spirit. It begins with a rhythmic and march-like idea being introduced, before strings fully expose it as a determined and life-affirming main theme in form of a march. The rhythms become increasingly varied and complex. The central section features a melodic second theme introduced by woodwinds, vaguely resembling of Elgar. The main material then returns, before a crescendo leads to a brilliant climax on the second theme. The alla marcia then ends with a grand flourish.
The fourth movement opens with a brooding and enigmatic introduction, before the English horn presented a main theme possessing the same qualities. It passes onto clarinet and then strings, turning much more passionate and richly scored as it unfolds. The brass then introduces a noble and solemn second theme. Themes and ideas from previous movements are quoted in the following development, in which polytonality is employed. The most notable instance of the latter is the quotation of the alla marcia main material on piccolo. The music reaches an imposing climax enhanced by the brass, which also begins the recapitulation of the main themes. A final dissonant outburst leads to a poetic fade-out coda.
Picture: "View of a city" (1944) by the Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2ymhdyba and tinyurl.com/2cfmwx6k
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
BBC Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Con brio: 0:00
II - Largo: 8:12
III - Alla marcia: 18:39
IV - Andante, con malinconico: 23:30
Lloyd's Symphony No.2 was finished in March 1933, being revised much later in 1982. The first three movements were performed in March 1933, played by the Eastbourne Municipal Orchestra conducted by the composer. The first complete performance was given in January 1986 by the BBC Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by the composer, this recording being made a few days later.
Lloyd’s Second Symphony is a remarkable achievement for a 19-year-old. In terms of structure, it’s loosely based on Tchaikovsky’s Sixth, with its peppy third-movement march (its tune fully worthy of the great Russian composer) and melancholy finale (bluesy rather than hysterically despairing). More importantly, the work shows Lloyd fully in command of his own personal idiom. The orchestration is brilliant without resorting to special effects or extras. The symphony is one of Lloyd's most harmonically "modern" works in that it uses polytonality (simultaneous sounding of instrumental voices in different keys), a device he rarely used thereafter.
The first movement is structured as a sonata-rondo. It begins with a rhythmic and exhilarating main theme, shared between strings and brass. It is contrasted by a graceful and dance-like second theme introduced by oboe and pizzicato strings. The third theme is vigorously joyful and animated, with a braying Mahlerian horn-call. The ensuing development features fragments of the material, combining and transforming them while modulating through keys and engaging in rhythmic and dynamic variance. The themes are then recapitulated in a varied way, before a forceful and assertive coda closes the con brio.
The second movement is written as a theme and variations. After an evocative introduction dominated by the horn, a widely lyrical and expressive main theme is introduced by clarinets, then taken by strings. The material is then unfolded in a series of variations, initially being sinuous and darkly-coloured, underpinned by increasingly chromatic harmony. A more rhythmic and agitated passage in the central part is followed by an ornate, arabesque-style writing for solo first violin. A passionate and expressive climax is reached near the end, before the largo ends with a longing diminuendo coda.
The third movement is written in ternary form, resembling a scherzo in spirit. It begins with a rhythmic and march-like idea being introduced, before strings fully expose it as a determined and life-affirming main theme in form of a march. The rhythms become increasingly varied and complex. The central section features a melodic second theme introduced by woodwinds, vaguely resembling of Elgar. The main material then returns, before a crescendo leads to a brilliant climax on the second theme. The alla marcia then ends with a grand flourish.
The fourth movement opens with a brooding and enigmatic introduction, before the English horn presented a main theme possessing the same qualities. It passes onto clarinet and then strings, turning much more passionate and richly scored as it unfolds. The brass then introduces a noble and solemn second theme. Themes and ideas from previous movements are quoted in the following development, in which polytonality is employed. The most notable instance of the latter is the quotation of the alla marcia main material on piccolo. The music reaches an imposing climax enhanced by the brass, which also begins the recapitulation of the main themes. A final dissonant outburst leads to a poetic fade-out coda.
Picture: "View of a city" (1944) by the Dutch painter Carel Willink.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2ymhdyba and tinyurl.com/2cfmwx6k
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
![Symphony No.4 in E major - Franz Lachner
Evergreen Symphony Orchestra conducted by Gernot Schmalfuss.
I - Andante pesante - Più mosso - Allegro - Più mosso: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegro assai quasi presto - Meno mosso - Da capo: 19:13
III - Andante: 27:58
IV - Finale. Andante - Allegro assai: 37:44
Lachners Symphony No.4 was finished on November 17 of 1834, two months after accepting a post as court conductor at the court and National Theatre in Mannheim. It was rehearsed in that city on 1835, but the audiences general indifference towards Lachners music discouraged the composer. In the end, it was premiered in Vienna on October 31 of 1835, where it was very well-received, specially by critics. Lachner conducted the work once more on April 18 of 1836 at the last of the four seasonal academy concerts in Mannheim; then it fell completely silent.
Obviously, the work was overshadowed by Symphony No.5 in C minor (Sinfonia Passionata), which caused much controversy throughout the German-speaking world after its premiere in Vienna. In contrast, the fourth symphony fell into oblivion and never appeared in print. The work itself represents a transition between the more conventional third and the more substantial and expansive fifth symphony. During this time, Lachner was in his zenith as both as a composer and conductor. The confrontational juxtaposition of large-scale thematic blocks, found in his Symphonies nos.3, 4, and 5 preceded Bruckner in several decades.
The first movement is structured in a large-scale sonata form. It begins with a substantial andante introduction. An evocative horn solo introduces a widely lyrical melody in E major, a motive that will be key later on. The main allegro begins with a flowing and nostalgic main theme in E major, based on the horn melody and supported by a triplet rhythm. A vigorous transition leads to the passionate and expressive second theme in B minor, which is contrasted by a triumphal and joyful third theme in B major, offering great contrast. This exposition is then repeated in its entirety.
The development starts with the main theme on the basses in the key of C major, before it is fragmented and combined with the transition material with added counterpoint. Then the second theme heroically reappears in fortissimo on trombones and basses, wavering between B minor and major on trombones and bass. After a powerful climax is reached, a pianissimo cadence leads to the recapitulation of the themes. The only notable difference from the exposition is that the transition and second theme are now in the key of C-sharp minor. The material is again fragmented and quoted in the coda, which ends the allegro with a brilliant E major.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It opens with a rhythmic and elegant main theme in E major in 3/4 time, with up and down beats, rapid tempo and sudden changes of key. Occasional reminiscences of the first movement appear, such as the beginning of the main theme, first on cellos and then on violins. The non-repeated second section of the scherzo contains a veritable development of the opening theme, with canonic entries, elisions and sequential chains. At the climax, the beginning of theme appears as an upbeat in a sequence in the strings over weighty wind chords.
The central trio (also in E major) features a much slower Ländler-like second theme, divided in two parts that are repeated. At the beginning of the second section, the horns present an elegiac minor-key variation, before reappearing on full orchestra in a major key. Then motifs from the trio are combined with the beginning of the scherzo theme in an upbeat and leisurely tempo; in this way it also serves as a transition to the complete repeat of the scherzo da capo. A vigorous coda ends the movement.
The third movement is structured as a theme and variations. It begins with a lyrical, chorale-like main theme in C major, introduced by strings with each line ending marked by a wind chord; the actual chorale then appears in the divisi cellos. This is repeated by the horns and a further line is added in the divisi cellos, then taken up by the woodwinds. The trombone section returns to the introduction. A thematically independent, accelerated interlude in F major in the woodwinds, supported by pizzicato chords in the double basses, builds up to a restrained high point.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Forest of Fontainebleau (1834) by the French painter Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/28w2cygx
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/24hllj7e Symphony No.4 in E major - Franz Lachner](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Di0IHPeEu7U/mqdefault.jpg)


![Symphony No.2 in E-flat major - Edward Elgar
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Mackerras.
I - Allegro vivace e nobilmente - Impetuoso - Tempo I - Più lento - Tranquillo - Animato - Tempo I - Impetuoso - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Larghetto - Nobilmente e semplice - Lento: 16:14
III - Rondo. Presto: 31:20
IV - Moderato e maestoso - Grandioso - Nobilmente - Poco animato - Con fuoco - Poco a poco più tranquillo - Tempo I: 39:30
Elgars Symphony No.2 was composed between 1909-11, but with material that had been slowly gestated from 1903 onwards. It was premiered on May 24 of 1911 at the Queens Hall, performed by the Queens Hall Orchestra conducted by the composer. The piece was rather coldly received by the audience, far from the extraordinary success of the first symphony. Despite the fact that the piece was much better received in subsequent performances, this initial reception sparked a creative crisis in Elgars life.
While having no explicitly programmatic content, the symphony is heavily autobiographical; it reflects the triumphs and failures of preceding years, romances and deaths, the travels and discoveries and the overall splendorous age the United Kingdom enjoyed in what was called the Belle Époque, which would soon meet its end in the horrors of the Great War. Although Elgar defended the purity of abstract music, he wrote a few words about his work: It represents the passionate pilgrimage of a soul. The score of the work contains some lines of the poem Invocation by Shelley: Rarely, rarely comest thou, Spirit of delight!
While in the first symphony Elgar achieved thematic and structural unity through a single theme recurring in all four movements, with the second unity is achieved through extensive cross-references between movements. The symphonys thematic material, like much of Elgars work, consists of short, closely interrelated motives which are developed via repetition, sequential techniques, and the aforementioned subtle cross-references. Harmonically, the piece often borders on tonal ambiguity, pushing towards the dissolution of tonality. For this reason the piece is more complex and subsequently less popular than the first, although many consider it the better of the two.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with an exuberant and wilful main theme that we will call the spirit of delight, reappearing in the following movements as a unifying element. It is contrasted by a lyrical, dreamy second theme introduced by violins and fully exposed by cellos. The music grows until reaching a powerful climax of tremendous energy. The ensuing development is mysterious and eerie, with the spirit of delight theme peeking around. A rich, voluptuous theme is introduced (appearing most clearly on cellos), which will also reappear later on. It is described by Elgar as a sort of malign influence wandering through the summer night in the garden. The development continues until voluptuous reappears once again, but with a lot more of malice and menace. The propulsive energy of the main theme leads us to another thunderous climax, followed by the recapitulation of the themes. Tension and dissonance begins to accumulate, leading us to the climactic coda. A brief pause, in form of a lyrical and contemplative passage, precedes the appearance of the spirit of delight theme, bringing the movement to a firm and decided end.
The second movement is written in form of a sonatina (sonata without development). It opens with an expressive, dirge-like main theme on strings. It unfolds in form of a funereal march with solemn, slow drum taps and heavy brass chords. A wistful transition leads us to a solemn, expansive second theme in form of a brilliant hymn, introduced softly before rising full of passion. The main theme is then recapitulated with an extended oboe solo which weaves a counterpoint of remarkable subtlety and beauty. It was described by Elgar as a feminine voice lamenting over the broad manly first theme. The second theme leads us to a noble and solemn climax. The spirit of delight theme makes an appearance, firstly in the clarinets and violas, then a brief reference in the violins before the movement finally closes. Many believed it was an elegy to the recently deceased monarch Edward VII (to whom the piece is also dedicated), however its more probably that is a form of personal expression of Elgars grief, as he had lost close friends at the time.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Westminster Sunset, London (1900) by the English painter Albert Goodwin.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2azbw8er, https://tinyurl.com/23sc6mkt and https://tinyurl.com/2cl5nrxw
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/23a5lhlb Symphony No.2 in E-flat major - Edward Elgar](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EEheTPGnOQY/mqdefault.jpg)


![Symphony No.11 - George Lloyd
Albany Symphony Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Vivo: 0:00
II - Lento: 17:55
III - Leggiero e brillante: 26:51
IV - Grave: 35:26
V - Finale. Con esultazione: 43:25
Lloyds Symphony No.11 was composed in 1985, being commissioned by the Albany Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered at the Troy Savings Bank Music Hall on Troy, New York, performed by the aforementioned orchestra conducted by the composer. According to Lloyd, the piece was very well-received. Written in five movements of symmetrical proportion; two large movements surrounding two shorter slow ones, which surround a central scherzo. The piece is also scored for large orchestra, and alongside Lloyds fifth and seventh symphonies, is a major statement in the postromantic symphonic tradition.
After over twenty years of neglect, Lloyds music was rediscovered by the public at large after a 1977 BBC broadcast performance of his Symphony No.8. The composer tonal postromanticism, which was deemed a regressive by the English musical establishment, was appreciated by the public. In addition to the BBC, Lloyd found a steadfast champion in the form of the Albany (New York) Symphony Orchestra, which played his music and commissioned more, and in the Albany Record Company, one of Americas more enterprising high-quality compact disc labels. This symphony was both commissioned by that orchestra and recorded and released by that label.
The first movement is structured in a large-scale sonata form. It begins with a dramatic series of motives, most notably a fast descending figure on woodwinds and horn calls in triplet rhythm. These are the roots the fierce and vivacious main theme is composed. Follows a martial and dissonant second theme built on a 12-tone row that is treated in a non-serial fashion. A diminuendo transition, dominated by a solo from the English horn, leads to a mysterious and darkly coloured third theme. It is sustained by fragments of the previous material, the theme growing more lyrical and expressive until reaching a climax that is suddenly cut off.
The development and transformation of the themes ensues, each seemingly battling for prominence. The music dissolves in another mysterious passage, before tension and dissonance begins to accumulate, starting a varied recapitulation of the material. A powerful climax is reached with the second theme, followed by another climax with a major-key return of the main theme. A diminuendo slows the music down, with brief reminiscences of fragments of the material, before the vivo ends with a meditative fade-out coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with an expressive and chromatic main theme on violins and supported by horn chords, almost mystical in tone. There is no contrasting motives or themes, but a continual development of the main material, unfolding with great lyricism with rich orchestration. A passionate and intense climax near the end is reached, reminiscent of Mahler. The music then returns to the opening poignancy, before the lento ends with a serene coda.
The third movement is a scherzo in expanded ternary form (A-B-A-B-A-Coda). It begins with a rhythmic and animated main theme, somewhat Iberian in its dance-like rhythms. The trio section features a widely lyrical and cantabile second theme on bass clarinet, supported by harp and strings. The scherzo then resumes with the return of the main material, followed by the second one as well. Both themes are contrapuntally combined. A final return of the main material leads to a passionate and life-affirming climax. The music then slows down before the scherzo ends with a vigorous coda.
The fourth movement is structured in a simpler ternary form. It opens with harshly dissonant chords on full orchestra, reminiscent of the opening horn calls. A lyrical main theme is presented by strings and woodwinds over a marching rhythm on percussion and brass, as if echoes of a military band that may be a reference to Lloyds service as a Marine bandsman during World War II. The menacing and dissonant martial rhythms return, before brass introduces an expressive, somewhat funereal second theme, with which the music reaches a passionate climax of tragic tone. The main theme is then recapitulated in all its lyricismsm, with a brief but dramatic disturbance with the return of the marching rhythms. The grave ends with a peaceful coda as the music dissolves in the silence.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: And the Saved World Remembers (1985) by the Belarusian painter Mai Dantsig.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2ydy4b58 and https://tinyurl.com/23d4dtdx
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.11 - George Lloyd](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/F1GxFSZ_-iQ/mqdefault.jpg)



