Uploaded January 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Mackerras.
I - Allegro vivace e nobilmente - Impetuoso - Tempo I - Più lento - Tranquillo - Animato - Tempo I - Impetuoso - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Larghetto - Nobilmente e semplice - Lento: 16:14
III - Rondo. Presto: 31:20
IV - Moderato e maestoso - Grandioso - Nobilmente - Poco animato - Con fuoco - Poco a poco più tranquillo - Tempo I: 39:30
Elgar's Symphony No.2 was composed between 1909-11, but with material that had been slowly gestated from 1903 onwards. It was premiered on May 24 of 1911 at the Queen's Hall, performed by the Queen's Hall Orchestra conducted by the composer. The piece was rather coldly received by the audience, far from the extraordinary success of the first symphony. Despite the fact that the piece was much better received in subsequent performances, this initial reception sparked a creative crisis in Elgar's life.
While having no explicitly programmatic content, the symphony is heavily autobiographical; it reflects the triumphs and failures of preceding years, romances and deaths, the travels and discoveries and the overall splendorous age the United Kingdom enjoyed in what was called the "Belle Époque", which would soon meet its end in the horrors of the Great War. Although Elgar defended the purity of abstract music, he wrote a few words about his work: "It represents the passionate pilgrimage of a soul". The score of the work contains some lines of the poem "Invocation" by Shelley: "Rarely, rarely comest thou, Spirit of delight!"
While in the first symphony Elgar achieved thematic and structural unity through a single theme recurring in all four movements, with the second unity is achieved through extensive cross-references between movements. The symphony's thematic material, like much of Elgar's work, consists of short, closely interrelated motives which are developed via repetition, sequential techniques, and the aforementioned subtle cross-references. Harmonically, the piece often borders on tonal ambiguity, pushing towards the dissolution of tonality. For this reason the piece is more complex and subsequently less popular than the first, although many consider it the better of the two.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with an exuberant and wilful main theme that we will call the spirit of delight, reappearing in the following movements as a unifying element. It is contrasted by a lyrical, dreamy second theme introduced by violins and fully exposed by cellos. The music grows until reaching a powerful climax of tremendous energy. The ensuing development is mysterious and eerie, with the spirit of delight theme peeking around. A rich, voluptuous theme is introduced (appearing most clearly on cellos), which will also reappear later on. It is described by Elgar as "a sort of malign influence wandering through the summer night in the garden". The development continues until voluptuous reappears once again, but with a lot more of malice and menace. The propulsive energy of the main theme leads us to another thunderous climax, followed by the recapitulation of the themes. Tension and dissonance begins to accumulate, leading us to the climactic coda. A brief pause, in form of a lyrical and contemplative passage, precedes the appearance of the spirit of delight theme, bringing the movement to a firm and decided end.
The second movement is written in form of a sonatina (sonata without development). It opens with an expressive, dirge-like main theme on strings. It unfolds in form of a funereal march with solemn, slow drum taps and heavy brass chords. A wistful transition leads us to a solemn, expansive second theme in form of a brilliant hymn, introduced softly before rising full of passion. The main theme is then recapitulated with an extended oboe solo which weaves a counterpoint of remarkable subtlety and beauty. It was described by Elgar as a "feminine voice lamenting over the broad manly first theme". The second theme leads us to a noble and solemn climax. The spirit of delight theme makes an appearance, firstly in the clarinets and violas, then a brief reference in the violins before the movement finally closes. Many believed it was an elegy to the recently deceased monarch Edward VII (to whom the piece is also dedicated), however its more probably that is a form of personal expression of Elgar's grief, as he had lost close friends at the time.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: "Westminster Sunset, London" (1900) by the English painter Albert Goodwin.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2azbw8er, tinyurl.com/23sc6mkt and tinyurl.com/2cl5nrxw
To check the score: tinyurl.com/23a5lhlb
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Mackerras.
I - Allegro vivace e nobilmente - Impetuoso - Tempo I - Più lento - Tranquillo - Animato - Tempo I - Impetuoso - Tempo I: 0:00
II - Larghetto - Nobilmente e semplice - Lento: 16:14
III - Rondo. Presto: 31:20
IV - Moderato e maestoso - Grandioso - Nobilmente - Poco animato - Con fuoco - Poco a poco più tranquillo - Tempo I: 39:30
Elgar's Symphony No.2 was composed between 1909-11, but with material that had been slowly gestated from 1903 onwards. It was premiered on May 24 of 1911 at the Queen's Hall, performed by the Queen's Hall Orchestra conducted by the composer. The piece was rather coldly received by the audience, far from the extraordinary success of the first symphony. Despite the fact that the piece was much better received in subsequent performances, this initial reception sparked a creative crisis in Elgar's life.
While having no explicitly programmatic content, the symphony is heavily autobiographical; it reflects the triumphs and failures of preceding years, romances and deaths, the travels and discoveries and the overall splendorous age the United Kingdom enjoyed in what was called the "Belle Époque", which would soon meet its end in the horrors of the Great War. Although Elgar defended the purity of abstract music, he wrote a few words about his work: "It represents the passionate pilgrimage of a soul". The score of the work contains some lines of the poem "Invocation" by Shelley: "Rarely, rarely comest thou, Spirit of delight!"
While in the first symphony Elgar achieved thematic and structural unity through a single theme recurring in all four movements, with the second unity is achieved through extensive cross-references between movements. The symphony's thematic material, like much of Elgar's work, consists of short, closely interrelated motives which are developed via repetition, sequential techniques, and the aforementioned subtle cross-references. Harmonically, the piece often borders on tonal ambiguity, pushing towards the dissolution of tonality. For this reason the piece is more complex and subsequently less popular than the first, although many consider it the better of the two.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with an exuberant and wilful main theme that we will call the spirit of delight, reappearing in the following movements as a unifying element. It is contrasted by a lyrical, dreamy second theme introduced by violins and fully exposed by cellos. The music grows until reaching a powerful climax of tremendous energy. The ensuing development is mysterious and eerie, with the spirit of delight theme peeking around. A rich, voluptuous theme is introduced (appearing most clearly on cellos), which will also reappear later on. It is described by Elgar as "a sort of malign influence wandering through the summer night in the garden". The development continues until voluptuous reappears once again, but with a lot more of malice and menace. The propulsive energy of the main theme leads us to another thunderous climax, followed by the recapitulation of the themes. Tension and dissonance begins to accumulate, leading us to the climactic coda. A brief pause, in form of a lyrical and contemplative passage, precedes the appearance of the spirit of delight theme, bringing the movement to a firm and decided end.
The second movement is written in form of a sonatina (sonata without development). It opens with an expressive, dirge-like main theme on strings. It unfolds in form of a funereal march with solemn, slow drum taps and heavy brass chords. A wistful transition leads us to a solemn, expansive second theme in form of a brilliant hymn, introduced softly before rising full of passion. The main theme is then recapitulated with an extended oboe solo which weaves a counterpoint of remarkable subtlety and beauty. It was described by Elgar as a "feminine voice lamenting over the broad manly first theme". The second theme leads us to a noble and solemn climax. The spirit of delight theme makes an appearance, firstly in the clarinets and violas, then a brief reference in the violins before the movement finally closes. Many believed it was an elegy to the recently deceased monarch Edward VII (to whom the piece is also dedicated), however its more probably that is a form of personal expression of Elgar's grief, as he had lost close friends at the time.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: "Westminster Sunset, London" (1900) by the English painter Albert Goodwin.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/2azbw8er, tinyurl.com/23sc6mkt and tinyurl.com/2cl5nrxw
To check the score: tinyurl.com/23a5lhlb


![Symphony No.11 - George Lloyd
Albany Symphony Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Vivo: 0:00
II - Lento: 17:55
III - Leggiero e brillante: 26:51
IV - Grave: 35:26
V - Finale. Con esultazione: 43:25
Lloyds Symphony No.11 was composed in 1985, being commissioned by the Albany Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered at the Troy Savings Bank Music Hall on Troy, New York, performed by the aforementioned orchestra conducted by the composer. According to Lloyd, the piece was very well-received. Written in five movements of symmetrical proportion; two large movements surrounding two shorter slow ones, which surround a central scherzo. The piece is also scored for large orchestra, and alongside Lloyds fifth and seventh symphonies, is a major statement in the postromantic symphonic tradition.
After over twenty years of neglect, Lloyds music was rediscovered by the public at large after a 1977 BBC broadcast performance of his Symphony No.8. The composer tonal postromanticism, which was deemed a regressive by the English musical establishment, was appreciated by the public. In addition to the BBC, Lloyd found a steadfast champion in the form of the Albany (New York) Symphony Orchestra, which played his music and commissioned more, and in the Albany Record Company, one of Americas more enterprising high-quality compact disc labels. This symphony was both commissioned by that orchestra and recorded and released by that label.
The first movement is structured in a large-scale sonata form. It begins with a dramatic series of motives, most notably a fast descending figure on woodwinds and horn calls in triplet rhythm. These are the roots the fierce and vivacious main theme is composed. Follows a martial and dissonant second theme built on a 12-tone row that is treated in a non-serial fashion. A diminuendo transition, dominated by a solo from the English horn, leads to a mysterious and darkly coloured third theme. It is sustained by fragments of the previous material, the theme growing more lyrical and expressive until reaching a climax that is suddenly cut off.
The development and transformation of the themes ensues, each seemingly battling for prominence. The music dissolves in another mysterious passage, before tension and dissonance begins to accumulate, starting a varied recapitulation of the material. A powerful climax is reached with the second theme, followed by another climax with a major-key return of the main theme. A diminuendo slows the music down, with brief reminiscences of fragments of the material, before the vivo ends with a meditative fade-out coda.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with an expressive and chromatic main theme on violins and supported by horn chords, almost mystical in tone. There is no contrasting motives or themes, but a continual development of the main material, unfolding with great lyricism with rich orchestration. A passionate and intense climax near the end is reached, reminiscent of Mahler. The music then returns to the opening poignancy, before the lento ends with a serene coda.
The third movement is a scherzo in expanded ternary form (A-B-A-B-A-Coda). It begins with a rhythmic and animated main theme, somewhat Iberian in its dance-like rhythms. The trio section features a widely lyrical and cantabile second theme on bass clarinet, supported by harp and strings. The scherzo then resumes with the return of the main material, followed by the second one as well. Both themes are contrapuntally combined. A final return of the main material leads to a passionate and life-affirming climax. The music then slows down before the scherzo ends with a vigorous coda.
The fourth movement is structured in a simpler ternary form. It opens with harshly dissonant chords on full orchestra, reminiscent of the opening horn calls. A lyrical main theme is presented by strings and woodwinds over a marching rhythm on percussion and brass, as if echoes of a military band that may be a reference to Lloyds service as a Marine bandsman during World War II. The menacing and dissonant martial rhythms return, before brass introduces an expressive, somewhat funereal second theme, with which the music reaches a passionate climax of tragic tone. The main theme is then recapitulated in all its lyricismsm, with a brief but dramatic disturbance with the return of the marching rhythms. The grave ends with a peaceful coda as the music dissolves in the silence.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: And the Saved World Remembers (1985) by the Belarusian painter Mai Dantsig.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2ydy4b58 and https://tinyurl.com/23d4dtdx
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.11 - George Lloyd](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/F1GxFSZ_-iQ/mqdefault.jpg)







![Symphony No.4 The Victory - Heitor Villa-Lobos
Stuttgart Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Carl St Clair.
I - Allegro impetuoso: 0:00
II - Andantino: 6:51
III - Andante: 12:45
IV - Lento - Allegro: 19:08
Villa-Loboss Symphony No.4 (A Vitória) was composed between 1919-20, being commissioned by the Brazilian Government to celebrate the armistice of World War I. It was premiered (together with the third symphony) in Rio de Janeiro on September 1920, performed by the Orchestra do Theatro Municipal conducted by the composer in a concert given in honour of Albert I and Elisabeth of Bavaria, the King and Queen of Belgium. The second part in a war trilogy, it is a cyclical work that incorporates materials from the previous symphony.
Brazilian classical music closely followed European models until the XX century, when a nationalist style began to form anchored on a mix of Brazilian folklore and popular music, without completely discarding European influences. Villa-Lobos was at the forefront of said movement, and his symphonies particularly reflect this mixture. The early ones (No.1-5) show the influence of the French school, particularly Vincent dIndy and his cyclical works. Brazils musical institutions had closely imitated the French model, and Villa-Lobos studied dIndys Cours de Composition Musicale, which would influence his music for most of his life.
Brazil had a minor involvement in the First World War, but the country was transformed by the impact of the conflict. It initially declared itself neutral, but the torpedo attack on Brazilian ships by German submarines in 1917 provoked national outrage, obliging the government to align itself against the Germanic coalition, by patrolling the South Atlantic. Coffee, Brazil’s only export product, was no longer deemed an essential commodity during the conflict, and this forced the country to diversify its economy and begin to establish an industrial infrastructure, which led to prosperity in the 1920s. The three symphonies that form Villa-Lobos War tryptich (Nos. 3-5) were based on texts by the Brazilian historian Luiz d’Escragnolle Doria.
The program goes as follows: Still the war...years go by, the combat goes on....Europe is a graveyard of unknown caves. The man from India dies alongside the man from Australia, the African is buried alongside the Canadian. Among the thunderheads of war...appears the figure of Victory, running among the combatants, cheering them on, carrying with her the olive wreath. She runs to France and begs her to lead the flower of the universe to the strains of La Marseillaise....
She runs to the combatants in the trenches,...instilling courage in them and promising the golden hour of triumph. She mourns the dead. She kisses the forehead of those who advance....She girdles the chest of the wounded, she runs to comfort the mothers, the sisters.... It is Victory, offering peace to the men, months of work, years of prosperity, while the plow tills the fields, the trains roll, the factories hum....Behold Victory, announcing the last trumpet calls, ready to fall silent, in the praises of redeemed peoples, of liberated races.
The first movement is structured as a rondo (A-B-A-C-A-Coda). It begins with a violent and war-like introduction, reminiscent of the finale of the previous symphony (it even has the same tempo mark). A fierce and martial main theme is introduced by the brass over the snare drum, which will reappear throughout the symphony. Then a deeply expressive and passionate second theme is introduced by strings, before the main theme leads to a powerful climax. After a diminuendo, a bucolic and peaceful transition leads to a piercing and sorrowful third theme on strings and bell, culminating in another climax. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied but determined way. A slow coda comprised of unresolved dissonances end the allegro in an apocalyptic way.
The second movement is loosely structured in ternary form. It opens with the bellicose main theme of the first movement on the wood. It is then transformed in a modal variation whose melodic contours bring to mind Debussy and Russian music. Allusions of Villa-Lobos Symphony No. 3 are present throughout the work, but are most notable in the brass fanfares and the La Marseillaise quote, which was present in the first and fourth movements of the aforementioned symphony. A series of ostinati lead to an anxious and increasingly dissonant climax, with the main theme on the brass. The modal variation of the theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, leading to a final bellicose climax with which the andantino ends.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: The Victory of Law and Justice (1920) by Belgian painter Jean Delville.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/27awk4hl, https://tinyurl.com/2474jxuf and https://tinyurl.com/25q7ed2c
Unfortunately, the score is not freely available. Symphony No.4 The Victory - Heitor Villa-Lobos](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HSW7RyrZjkE/mqdefault.jpg)