Uploaded May 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This is the first video in my annual Supreme Court Wrap Up. Today we will be revisiting a pair of cases from my Supreme Court Roundup last fall. These cases are
"Twitter v Taamneh" and
"Gonzalez v Google."
The Supreme Court handed down two unanimous opinions on May 18th 2023 for both cases stating that the claims against Twitter & Google in regards to the Anti-Terrorism Act §2333 and the Communications and Decency Act §230 do not amount to "aiding and abetting" in a manner that would make these platforms liable for damages following a terrorist attack.
SHOW NOTES PAGE FOR THIS EPISODE - constitutionallaw.substack.com/p/supreme-court-wrap-up-on-big-tech?r=jkc76
Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter - legaleseshow.com
Legalese Homepage - legalesepodcast.com
Contact Me - Bob@legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
This is the first video in my annual Supreme Court Wrap Up. Today we will be revisiting a pair of cases from my Supreme Court Roundup last fall. These cases are
"Twitter v Taamneh" and
"Gonzalez v Google."
The Supreme Court handed down two unanimous opinions on May 18th 2023 for both cases stating that the claims against Twitter & Google in regards to the Anti-Terrorism Act §2333 and the Communications and Decency Act §230 do not amount to "aiding and abetting" in a manner that would make these platforms liable for damages following a terrorist attack.
SHOW NOTES PAGE FOR THIS EPISODE - constitutionallaw.substack.com/p/supreme-court-wrap-up-on-big-tech?r=jkc76
Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter - legaleseshow.com
Legalese Homepage - legalesepodcast.com
Contact Me - Bob@legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.










