Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
In a rare 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that being a marijuana user does not, by itself, strip you of your Second Amendment rights under federal law (18 USC 922(g)(3)). John Dillon of Dillon Law Group and Kostas of the Second Amendment Foundation join Michael to break down a narrow ruling with massive reach.
In this segment:
• What the case actually decided — and what it left open
• Why "unlawful user" alone is no longer enough to disarm you
• How the Court picked apart the government's historical analogs
• Why the ATF's Form 4473 marijuana question now has to change
• How this could ripple into future Second Amendment cases
Support the work: saf.org
New episodes every Sunday. Subscribe and hit the bell.
▶ gunownersradio.com
▶ youtube.com/@GunOwnersRadio
#SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt #GunRights #2A #GunOwnersRadio
In a rare 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that being a marijuana user does not, by itself, strip you of your Second Amendment rights under federal law (18 USC 922(g)(3)). John Dillon of Dillon Law Group and Kostas of the Second Amendment Foundation join Michael to break down a narrow ruling with massive reach.
In this segment:
• What the case actually decided — and what it left open
• Why "unlawful user" alone is no longer enough to disarm you
• How the Court picked apart the government's historical analogs
• Why the ATF's Form 4473 marijuana question now has to change
• How this could ripple into future Second Amendment cases
Support the work: saf.org
New episodes every Sunday. Subscribe and hit the bell.
▶ gunownersradio.com
▶ youtube.com/@GunOwnersRadio
#SecondAmendment #SupremeCourt #GunRights #2A #GunOwnersRadio










