Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 60) - Allegro non troppo: 0:00
II - Andante quasi adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 60) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 88) - Tempo I: 11:06
III - Scherzo. Allegro assai (𝅗𝅥. = 92) - Allegretto: 17:45
IV - Finale. Allegro agitato (𝅗𝅥 = 116): 21:59
Lachner's String Quartet No.4 was composed in 1849, not being published until 1866. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is monothematic in form. It begins with a melancholic adagio introduction, which leads to the main allegro. An expressive and dramatic main theme in D minor is introduced by the viola, passing onto cello and then first violin. No contrasting themes or new ideas are presented. After a passionate climax, the exposition is repeated, an element expected from works of the classical era. The ensuing development is turbulent and agitated, reaching an intense but short-lived climax. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, with a bold D major modulation before returning to D minor. A dramatic coda ends the allegro with a sudden and gloomy pianississimo.
The second movement is structured in ternary form. It opens with a deeply expressive and lyrical main theme in B-flat major, presented by the whole quartet. The central section then brings contrast with an agitated and passionate second theme in G minor, the whole section being a long and substantial climax in itself. A melancholic transition led by first violin then leads to the recapitulation of the main theme, which grows into another expressive climax. The andante then ends with a serene coda.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in D minor, presented by violins over viola and cello. The material is divided in two repeating parts, something that was commonly done with minuets of the classical era, less so with the scherzo. The trio section features a folkish and dance-like second theme in D major, also introduced by violins. The scherzo is then repeated da capo, ending with a resolute coda.
The fourth movement is written in sonata form. It begins with a lively and moody main theme in D minor, introduced by first violins. This is soon contrasted by a melodic and graceful second theme in F major. As in the first movement, the exposition is repeated. The following development is heavily contrapuntal in nature, transforming the material through a flowing yet expressive fugato. The material is then recapitulated, leading to a passionate climax. A brief modulation to D major leads us to a forceful and dramatic coda.
Picture: "Blind woman in the field" (1850) by the German painter Bruno Piglhein.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2y5m9fk3
To check the score: tinyurl.com/24rwt7ua
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 60) - Allegro non troppo: 0:00
II - Andante quasi adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 60) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥 = 88) - Tempo I: 11:06
III - Scherzo. Allegro assai (𝅗𝅥. = 92) - Allegretto: 17:45
IV - Finale. Allegro agitato (𝅗𝅥 = 116): 21:59
Lachner's String Quartet No.4 was composed in 1849, not being published until 1866. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is monothematic in form. It begins with a melancholic adagio introduction, which leads to the main allegro. An expressive and dramatic main theme in D minor is introduced by the viola, passing onto cello and then first violin. No contrasting themes or new ideas are presented. After a passionate climax, the exposition is repeated, an element expected from works of the classical era. The ensuing development is turbulent and agitated, reaching an intense but short-lived climax. The main theme is then recapitulated in a varied way, with a bold D major modulation before returning to D minor. A dramatic coda ends the allegro with a sudden and gloomy pianississimo.
The second movement is structured in ternary form. It opens with a deeply expressive and lyrical main theme in B-flat major, presented by the whole quartet. The central section then brings contrast with an agitated and passionate second theme in G minor, the whole section being a long and substantial climax in itself. A melancholic transition led by first violin then leads to the recapitulation of the main theme, which grows into another expressive climax. The andante then ends with a serene coda.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a rhythmic and vigorous main theme in D minor, presented by violins over viola and cello. The material is divided in two repeating parts, something that was commonly done with minuets of the classical era, less so with the scherzo. The trio section features a folkish and dance-like second theme in D major, also introduced by violins. The scherzo is then repeated da capo, ending with a resolute coda.
The fourth movement is written in sonata form. It begins with a lively and moody main theme in D minor, introduced by first violins. This is soon contrasted by a melodic and graceful second theme in F major. As in the first movement, the exposition is repeated. The following development is heavily contrapuntal in nature, transforming the material through a flowing yet expressive fugato. The material is then recapitulated, leading to a passionate climax. A brief modulation to D major leads us to a forceful and dramatic coda.
Picture: "Blind woman in the field" (1850) by the German painter Bruno Piglhein.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2y5m9fk3
To check the score: tinyurl.com/24rwt7ua




![Symphony No.9 - George Lloyd
BBC Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Allegro con delicatezza: 0:00
II - Largo: 10:51
III - Allegro con brio: 20:35
Lloyds Symphony No.9 was composed in December 1969, being premiered in Manchester on December 1982, performed by the BBC Northern Symphony Orchestra conducted by Sir Edward Downes. Whilst not on the same level as the great middle period symphonies, the Ninth is wholly Lloydian and demonstrates the breadth of expression his music encompasses. The disparate moods inhabited by the three movements lie side by side with scant regard to homogeneity, yet somehow the whole symphony does hang together by dint of the unmistakable hallmarks of its composer s sound-world throughout the piece; this is perhaps Lloyd s greatest achievement in this inimitable work.
The score was written at a time of neglect for Lloyds music. His early success in the thirties was cut short by his service in World War II and a horrible accident that left the composer recovering for decades. In the fifties Lloyd attempted to restart his compositional career, but by then his postromantic style was no longer appreciated, as modernism and serialism had taken over as predominant styles. Unwilling to change his language, eventually he gave up and became a market gardener, only writing music on his spare time, confined to a shelf with no hope of performance. It wasnt until a 1977 BBC broadcast performance of his Symphony No.8 that Lloyds music was rediscovered by the public at large.
The composer stated the following about the work: When a composer has written eight symphony [sic] he may find that the horizon has been blacked out by the overwhelming image of Beethoven and his one and only Ninth. There are other very good No. 5s and No. 3s, for instance, but how can one possibly have the temerity of trying to write another Ninth Symphony? I solved my problem by treating it lightheartedly. [...] If I had been a serious composer in the late nineteenth century, this symphony would have been at least an hour and a half long, and it would have concerned itself with life, death and resurrection. As I was born somewhat later than that, I will simply tell you that there are three movements, the first one is about a young girl, she dances and is a little sentimental; the second is about an old woman who reminisces - grief-stricken; and the third is the merry-go-round that just keeps on going round and round and round.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. After a chaotic opening, the allegro begins with a rhythmic and playful main theme of elfin breeziness, full of accents and changes of metre. It is contrasted by a lyrical and passionate second theme, richly scored in a postromantic fashion. The material seems to not appear fully-armed, but grow into themselves, a subtlety ignored by those who regard Lloyd s symphonies as merely a string of tunes. The return of the main theme signals the beginning of the development, reaching a climax with a transformation of the second theme. This leads to the varied recapitulation of the thematic material with a couple of brief outbursts. The allegro ends with a serene and contemplative coda, the strings divided into eleven parts, including a solo violin and cello.
The second movement is rather free in form, containing some of Lloyds most dissonant music. It opens with mysterious chords from woodwinds and brass, which will be a recurring element in the whole largo. English horn introduces a lyrical an expressive main theme, soon joined by the flute and passing onto strings. It unfolds in a tortuous and sorrowful manner, leading to a harsh climax. Cellos then take the main theme, followed by the oboe before the opening is recalled. The second theme of the previous allegro is quoted in a poignant flute solo over pulsating harp accompaniment. This brief, fragmentary remembrance is brutally cast aside in a sudden and short-lived climax. The harsh climax of before returns in full force, ending the largo with a slow and rather bleak diminuendo coda.
The third movement is also written in sonata form. It opens with percussion ostinati, before brass presents a brilliant and vigorous main theme. It is clearly derived from the main theme of the finale of Beethovens fifth symphony. This is followed by a graceful and dance-like second theme on woodwinds and strings. The development of the material begins with a contrapuntal passage, reaching a boisterous climax. The scoring is highly imaginative, colourful and effective. An animated climax leads to the recapitulation of the themes, before a crescendo leads to a brilliant and vitalistic coda.
Picture: Women of Algiers (1955) by Spanish painter Pablo Picasso.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2bacwo99 and https://tinyurl.com/22ky7ct4
Unfortunately, the score isnt available. Symphony No.9 - George Lloyd](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DIpAyw9j9PY/mqdefault.jpg)



![Symphony No.4 in E major - Franz Lachner
Evergreen Symphony Orchestra conducted by Gernot Schmalfuss.
I - Andante pesante - Più mosso - Allegro - Più mosso: 0:00
II - Scherzo. Allegro assai quasi presto - Meno mosso - Da capo: 19:13
III - Andante: 27:58
IV - Finale. Andante - Allegro assai: 37:44
Lachners Symphony No.4 was finished on November 17 of 1834, two months after accepting a post as court conductor at the court and National Theatre in Mannheim. It was rehearsed in that city on 1835, but the audiences general indifference towards Lachners music discouraged the composer. In the end, it was premiered in Vienna on October 31 of 1835, where it was very well-received, specially by critics. Lachner conducted the work once more on April 18 of 1836 at the last of the four seasonal academy concerts in Mannheim; then it fell completely silent.
Obviously, the work was overshadowed by Symphony No.5 in C minor (Sinfonia Passionata), which caused much controversy throughout the German-speaking world after its premiere in Vienna. In contrast, the fourth symphony fell into oblivion and never appeared in print. The work itself represents a transition between the more conventional third and the more substantial and expansive fifth symphony. During this time, Lachner was in his zenith as both as a composer and conductor. The confrontational juxtaposition of large-scale thematic blocks, found in his Symphonies nos.3, 4, and 5 preceded Bruckner in several decades.
The first movement is structured in a large-scale sonata form. It begins with a substantial andante introduction. An evocative horn solo introduces a widely lyrical melody in E major, a motive that will be key later on. The main allegro begins with a flowing and nostalgic main theme in E major, based on the horn melody and supported by a triplet rhythm. A vigorous transition leads to the passionate and expressive second theme in B minor, which is contrasted by a triumphal and joyful third theme in B major, offering great contrast. This exposition is then repeated in its entirety.
The development starts with the main theme on the basses in the key of C major, before it is fragmented and combined with the transition material with added counterpoint. Then the second theme heroically reappears in fortissimo on trombones and basses, wavering between B minor and major on trombones and bass. After a powerful climax is reached, a pianissimo cadence leads to the recapitulation of the themes. The only notable difference from the exposition is that the transition and second theme are now in the key of C-sharp minor. The material is again fragmented and quoted in the coda, which ends the allegro with a brilliant E major.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It opens with a rhythmic and elegant main theme in E major in 3/4 time, with up and down beats, rapid tempo and sudden changes of key. Occasional reminiscences of the first movement appear, such as the beginning of the main theme, first on cellos and then on violins. The non-repeated second section of the scherzo contains a veritable development of the opening theme, with canonic entries, elisions and sequential chains. At the climax, the beginning of theme appears as an upbeat in a sequence in the strings over weighty wind chords.
The central trio (also in E major) features a much slower Ländler-like second theme, divided in two parts that are repeated. At the beginning of the second section, the horns present an elegiac minor-key variation, before reappearing on full orchestra in a major key. Then motifs from the trio are combined with the beginning of the scherzo theme in an upbeat and leisurely tempo; in this way it also serves as a transition to the complete repeat of the scherzo da capo. A vigorous coda ends the movement.
The third movement is structured as a theme and variations. It begins with a lyrical, chorale-like main theme in C major, introduced by strings with each line ending marked by a wind chord; the actual chorale then appears in the divisi cellos. This is repeated by the horns and a further line is added in the divisi cellos, then taken up by the woodwinds. The trombone section returns to the introduction. A thematically independent, accelerated interlude in F major in the woodwinds, supported by pizzicato chords in the double basses, builds up to a restrained high point.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Forest of Fontainebleau (1834) by the French painter Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot.
Source: https://tinyurl.com/28w2cygx
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/24hllj7e Symphony No.4 in E major - Franz Lachner](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Di0IHPeEu7U/mqdefault.jpg)

