Stephen Holmes: Is Attention to Injustice Inevitably Selective? @EinsteinForum
Stephen Holmes: Is Attention to Injustice Inevitably Selective?  @EinsteinForum
Uploaded December 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
Lecture at the conference "Enlightenment on Trial", July 5 - 8, 2024

One challenge to Enlightenment universalism is the well-documented history of human concern for some not all victims of injustice. Individuals able to recognize victims on all sides of violent conflicts have always been, and remain today, politically marginal. For similar reasons, there is no popularly supported political party in any country in the world that advocates a “universalistic immigration policy.” The fact that such a policy is politically unfeasible does not weaken the moral truth of universalism. But what does it say about the possibility of an Enlightenment politics?
Stephen Holmes: Is Attention to Injustice Inevitably Selective?Sonia Combe: Alter “Mythos Antifaschismus”, neuer “Mythos Buchenwald” in der Geschichtsschreibung...Thomas Gugler: Pakistan im Spannungsfeld von Demokratie und MilitärherrschaftSusan Neiman, Benjamin Zachariah: Welcome Address and IntroductionGrzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe: Transnational Fascism in Western Ukraine: From Bandera to PutinBettina Stangneth: Judgment: The Willful Step in Heraclitus’ River. Thinking and Time—Movement 1Eva Menasse: Everything and Nothing. Communication in the Digital AgeKai Sina: Was gut ist und was böse. Thomas Mann als politischer AktivistGaspard Kœnig: Mit Montaigne auf Reisen. Abenteuer eines Philosophen zu PferdeVictor Grossman: The German Democratic Republic’s Engagement with Paul RobesonHans Misselwitz: “Herausfordernde Vergangenheit” / Aus Geschichte lernen?Susanne Evers: Kolonialismus im Schloss. Ausstellungen als Aufarbeitung
Einstein Forum |

Stephen Holmes: Is Attention to Injustice Inevitably Selective?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER