Steinberg v  Chicago Medical School Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained @QuimbeeDotCom
Steinberg v  Chicago Medical School Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained  @QuimbeeDotCom
Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School | 371 N.E.2d 634, 69 Ill. 2d 320 (1977)

The relationship between a private university and its students is largely governed by contract. Does a contract also exist between a school and applicants for admission? That's the question in Steinberg versus Chicago Medical School.

Robert Steinberg received a brochure from Chicago Medical School. The brochure stated that student applications would be evaluated based on academic achievement, admission test results, faculty appraisals, and personal interviews.

Steinberg applied to the school and paid a fifteen dollar application fee. His application was rejected.

Steinberg filed a class action against the school and state court alleging breach of contract, fraud, and other claims.

Steinberg asserted that instead of following the admissions criteria set out in the brochure, the school evaluated applications based on undisclosed criteria, namely the ability and willingness of applicants and their families to pay the school lots of money.

The trial court dismissed Steinberg's complaint for failure to state a claim. The Illinois appellate court reversed as to the contract claim, but affirmed the dismissal as to all other claims. Steinberg appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: [insert link of case brief on Quimbee]

The Quimbee App features over 42,700 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: [insert the link of the case brief on Quimbee]

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom

Quimbee Case Brief App ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Facebook ► facebook.com/quimbeedotcom

Twitter ► twitter.com/quimbeedotcom

#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Steinberg v  Chicago Medical School Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedBullington v. Palangio Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedLicari v  Blackwelder | Law Case ExplainedPeople v. Traughber Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedEricson v. Playgirl Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedBacou Dalloz USA v. Continental Polymers Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedWesberry v. Sanders Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedDiaz v. Oakland Tribune, Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedKauders v. Uber Technologies Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedManichaean Capital LLC v. Exela Technologies Inc. Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedWalt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates Case Brief Summary | Law Case ExplainedJohnson v. Coss Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Quimbee |

Steinberg v Chicago Medical School Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER