SIDERS CASE UPDATE 10 OF 10 @GoodWivesNet

Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago

Three of the adults in the Ohio "House of Horrors" case are now claiming mental incompetency to halt their criminal trials. 🛑 But what does that actually mean? Spoiler: It is NOT an insanity defense, and they won't just walk free. ⚖️ Here is the exact legal breakdown of what happens next and why the mother, Elizabeth, is adopting a completely different strategy. 👇
Hashtags: #SidersCase #VintonCounty #TrueCrimeCommunity #CrimeTok #CourtCase #LegalBreakdown #CompetencyHearing #OhioNews #FactCheck #TrueCrime #Justice

The Vault S1E7 THE CLINICAL CLARITY The Expert Echo Chamber

Patricia Stallings Another Case of False Medical Abuse Claims.

Becca Interview with Kim & David Blanchard December 2025

SADFISHING AND SYMPATHY HARVESTING DO YOUR FAV CREATORS DO THIS?

Substantiated The Fine Print of Wards of the State by Audrey Viecelli Episode 1 The Exoneration Myth

Call 23: The Calls From Inside: Gypsy Rose to Nick 8-27-2016: IMAX, Ankle Monitors,Biscuit & Gravy

$The Adninistrative Reality of the UCMJ vs The Wards of the State. The Administrative Reality of the UCMJ vs. Wards of the State In this video, we dissect the administrative, legal, and logical collapse of the military and domestic abuse claims made by Audrey Viecelli (Smith) in her book Wards of the State and her recent defensive video, Proof Beats Gossip Every Time . When we evaluate her modern-day claims against the public military record, her narrative completely implodes under the weight of three massive contradictions: The Prosecutorial Sweep: Audrey displays her official military witness statement documenting her husbands porn incident with a subordinate to prove she was telling the truth . However, she also boasts about forwarding these explicit nudes to his entire military company . Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), this act constitutes non-consensual dissemination of private sexual images. Rather than entangling their prosecution in a messy, dual-party legal circus involving a civilian spouses cybercrime, the military made a calculated, prosecutorial decision: they swept the messy interpersonal drama under the rug to secure a clean, focused conviction against Colt Smith under Article 124 (Maiming) and Article 128 (Aggravated Assault) of his 23-day-old infant . The Mutual Combat Admission: To defend her choice to stay married to her infants primary abuser, Audrey claims she was also a victim of domestic violence but admits on camera that the military jury didnt find Colt guilty of assaulting her because I hit him as well . By her own mouth, she admits her household was a highly volatile, physical battleground. Under child welfare law, introducing a newborn baby into a mutually violent, physically combative home and leaving him unsupervised with a violent partner is the exact legal definition of Failure to Protect and Lack of Supervision—the very findings she has spent 14 years claiming were a state conspiracy . The Courthouse Promotion Myth: Audrey claims that high-ranking military sergeants sat in the courthouse waiting room during Colts child abuse trial, fervently filling out paperwork for his promotion . Under military law, any service member actively facing a general court-martial is placed on an immediate, non-negotiable administrative legal hold, completely freezing and blocking all promotion actions. The military would never draft promotion recommendations for an E-3 on trial for fracturing an infants skull and ribs . By comparing her spoken words directly to the public legal records, we expose a highly calculated behavioral pattern of shifting alibis to maintain online sympathy and escape historical accountability. Lets read the fine print.$

The Good Wives Network |

SIDERS CASE UPDATE 10 OF 10