Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
When a covert narrator tries to rewrite a tragedy, they rely heavily on their audience’s ignorance of the legal system.
For years, Audrey Viecelli, author of Wards of the State, has claimed she was cleared of any wrongdoing in the catastrophic abuse of her infant son. She tells her audience that the military exonerated her, that her permanent placement on the Missouri Child Abuse Registry was merely a preliminary "admin filing," and that she only surrendered her parental rights because of a bureaucratic time limit.
But what happens when you read the fine print of the very documents she published in her own book? Her alibi completely collapses.
In Episode 1 of our forensic audit, we systematically dismantle the "Exoneration Myth" using Audrey's own paperwork, exposing the highly calculated legal tricks she uses to manipulate her audience.
🔍 In This Episode We Cover:
The "Admin Filing" Lie: We zoom in on the official Missouri Children’s Division letter to prove the investigation was legally "completed" and permanently "substantiated" against both parents.
The Jurisdictional Trick: Why Colt's military court-martial conviction for criminal assault did absolutely nothing to absolve Audrey in the eyes of the state.
The Burden of Proof: How she deliberately conflates Criminal Court's "beyond a reasonable doubt" with Family Court's "preponderance of evidence" to hide her own liability.
The Surrender Illusion: Why her decision to sign over her rights wasn't a noble sacrifice to the "Safe Families Act," but a strategic legal maneuver to avoid a hostile termination by a judge who saw through her fake apartment charade.
The state child welfare experts looked at her actions, her deception, and her failure to protect her infant from massive trauma, and they permanently held her legally responsible. She hopes you will never read the fine print or understand interstate family law. But the paperwork doesn't lie.
📚 Documents Referenced in this Episode:
Wards of the State by Audrey Viecelli (Appendix: Missouri Children's Division Letter)
Military Court-Martial Jurisdiction Protocols
Interstate Childcare Licensing Background Check Laws (The 5-Year Expiration Rule)
👇 Join the Conversation: Did you realize she was deliberately confusing military criminal law with civilian family court? Let’s discuss how she uses legal jargon to trick her audience in the comments below! Don't forget to subscribe for Episode 2, where we break down the medical science and timeline of the catastrophic injuries.
#WardsOfTheState #AudreyViecelli #FailureToProtect #ThePaperworkDoesntLie #TrueCrime #FamilyCourt #Receipts #ShakenBabySyndrome #ForensicAudit
Don't forget to give us a Thumbs Up for More Episodes. Click Subscribe and Ring the Bell so you never miss an episode.
Follow us on Twitter: facebook.com/thegoodwivesnet
Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/truecrimewives
Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/thegoodwivesnet
Connect With Us: Email questions, cases you'd like to see covered or business inquiries to thegoodwives@madgingerentertainment.com
Check out our new blogs at:
medium.com/murder-by-design
https://vocal.media/authors/the-good-wives-guide-to-true-crime
Visit our new website at thegoodwivesnetwork.com
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission (at no extra cost to you). This helps support the channel and allows me to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for your support!
*All content on this channel are the opinions of the Murder By Design Team. Statements made about celebrities, public figures, and others are for entertainment purposes. The opinions we present are based on the research we have done. We rely on case files, documentaries, live interviews, books and of course the internet for our research so from time to time we may get something wrong but we do our absolute best to bring the most factual information on the cases as we can.
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:
“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our youtube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.
When a covert narrator tries to rewrite a tragedy, they rely heavily on their audience’s ignorance of the legal system.
For years, Audrey Viecelli, author of Wards of the State, has claimed she was cleared of any wrongdoing in the catastrophic abuse of her infant son. She tells her audience that the military exonerated her, that her permanent placement on the Missouri Child Abuse Registry was merely a preliminary "admin filing," and that she only surrendered her parental rights because of a bureaucratic time limit.
But what happens when you read the fine print of the very documents she published in her own book? Her alibi completely collapses.
In Episode 1 of our forensic audit, we systematically dismantle the "Exoneration Myth" using Audrey's own paperwork, exposing the highly calculated legal tricks she uses to manipulate her audience.
🔍 In This Episode We Cover:
The "Admin Filing" Lie: We zoom in on the official Missouri Children’s Division letter to prove the investigation was legally "completed" and permanently "substantiated" against both parents.
The Jurisdictional Trick: Why Colt's military court-martial conviction for criminal assault did absolutely nothing to absolve Audrey in the eyes of the state.
The Burden of Proof: How she deliberately conflates Criminal Court's "beyond a reasonable doubt" with Family Court's "preponderance of evidence" to hide her own liability.
The Surrender Illusion: Why her decision to sign over her rights wasn't a noble sacrifice to the "Safe Families Act," but a strategic legal maneuver to avoid a hostile termination by a judge who saw through her fake apartment charade.
The state child welfare experts looked at her actions, her deception, and her failure to protect her infant from massive trauma, and they permanently held her legally responsible. She hopes you will never read the fine print or understand interstate family law. But the paperwork doesn't lie.
📚 Documents Referenced in this Episode:
Wards of the State by Audrey Viecelli (Appendix: Missouri Children's Division Letter)
Military Court-Martial Jurisdiction Protocols
Interstate Childcare Licensing Background Check Laws (The 5-Year Expiration Rule)
👇 Join the Conversation: Did you realize she was deliberately confusing military criminal law with civilian family court? Let’s discuss how she uses legal jargon to trick her audience in the comments below! Don't forget to subscribe for Episode 2, where we break down the medical science and timeline of the catastrophic injuries.
#WardsOfTheState #AudreyViecelli #FailureToProtect #ThePaperworkDoesntLie #TrueCrime #FamilyCourt #Receipts #ShakenBabySyndrome #ForensicAudit
Don't forget to give us a Thumbs Up for More Episodes. Click Subscribe and Ring the Bell so you never miss an episode.
Follow us on Twitter: facebook.com/thegoodwivesnet
Follow us on Facebook: facebook.com/truecrimewives
Follow us on Instagram: instagram.com/thegoodwivesnet
Connect With Us: Email questions, cases you'd like to see covered or business inquiries to thegoodwives@madgingerentertainment.com
Check out our new blogs at:
medium.com/murder-by-design
https://vocal.media/authors/the-good-wives-guide-to-true-crime
Visit our new website at thegoodwivesnetwork.com
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission (at no extra cost to you). This helps support the channel and allows me to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for your support!
*All content on this channel are the opinions of the Murder By Design Team. Statements made about celebrities, public figures, and others are for entertainment purposes. The opinions we present are based on the research we have done. We rely on case files, documentaries, live interviews, books and of course the internet for our research so from time to time we may get something wrong but we do our absolute best to bring the most factual information on the cases as we can.
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:
“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our youtube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.
