Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Fehlstart, for flute/piccolo, clarinet/bass clarinet, piano, drum kit, violin and cello (1999)
Ensemble Modern
Stefan Asbury
The basic formal idea of Fehlstart (Detail) is to construct a composition from detailed views of its own source material. The goal was to integrate these sharply differentiated details into a continuous process, thereby creating a balance between continuity and discontinuity as formal principles.
The piece is made up of 15 sections of gradually changing duration. Within these sections, the fundamental material—26 musical modules—is permuted in seven complete cycles. The permutations in the middle of the piece diverge furthest from the original order of modules, while the final section restores that original order.
Superimposed on this static structure is a linear process that realizes the core idea of the work: each recurrence of a module appears as a variant—an enlargement or magnification of detail. Each new version refers not to the original form but to the immediately preceding one, creating an effectively infinite sequence that could begin and end at any arbitrary point. In this sense, the existing movement represents only an excerpt from a continuous, potentially endless process.
As the module variants move progressively further away from their original form, static form and dynamic development eventually collide. When the modules reappear in their original order, the initial situation is nominally restored—yet the material is now completely transformed, and the “original” becomes unrecognizable.
The title Fehlstart (“False Start”) refers to False Start, a 1959 painting by Jasper Johns. The painting consists of fields of color applied in expressive brushstrokes, each labeled with stenciled color names. The catch is that the labels are consistently incorrect: for instance, “orange” might be written in white on a red field, or “white” in red on yellow. Similarly, at the end of Fehlstart (Detail), everything is back in its “correct” place—but nothing is as it was, since each component has changed along the way. --Sebastian Claren
Art by Jasper Johns
Fehlstart, for flute/piccolo, clarinet/bass clarinet, piano, drum kit, violin and cello (1999)
Ensemble Modern
Stefan Asbury
The basic formal idea of Fehlstart (Detail) is to construct a composition from detailed views of its own source material. The goal was to integrate these sharply differentiated details into a continuous process, thereby creating a balance between continuity and discontinuity as formal principles.
The piece is made up of 15 sections of gradually changing duration. Within these sections, the fundamental material—26 musical modules—is permuted in seven complete cycles. The permutations in the middle of the piece diverge furthest from the original order of modules, while the final section restores that original order.
Superimposed on this static structure is a linear process that realizes the core idea of the work: each recurrence of a module appears as a variant—an enlargement or magnification of detail. Each new version refers not to the original form but to the immediately preceding one, creating an effectively infinite sequence that could begin and end at any arbitrary point. In this sense, the existing movement represents only an excerpt from a continuous, potentially endless process.
As the module variants move progressively further away from their original form, static form and dynamic development eventually collide. When the modules reappear in their original order, the initial situation is nominally restored—yet the material is now completely transformed, and the “original” becomes unrecognizable.
The title Fehlstart (“False Start”) refers to False Start, a 1959 painting by Jasper Johns. The painting consists of fields of color applied in expressive brushstrokes, each labeled with stenciled color names. The catch is that the labels are consistently incorrect: for instance, “orange” might be written in white on a red field, or “white” in red on yellow. Similarly, at the end of Fehlstart (Detail), everything is back in its “correct” place—but nothing is as it was, since each component has changed along the way. --Sebastian Claren
Art by Jasper Johns

![Edward MacDowell - Piano Concerto No. 2
Piano Concerto No. 2, op. 23 (1885)
I. Larghetto Calmato
II. Presto Giocoso [13:15]
III. Largo-Molto Allegro [18:12]
Eugene List, piano
Vienna State Opera Orchestra
Carlos Chávez
MacDowells Second Piano Concerto was composed in Wiesbaden, Germany between 1884 and 1885 and was dedicated to the Venezuelan pianist Teresa Carreno. The American premiere was in New York on March 5, 1889 with the composer as soloist. The same concert included the American premier of Tchaikovsky’s Fifth Symphony. Critics decided then and there that MacDowell’s was the superior work! On March 13, 1889, the Musical Courier stated, “In the Tchaikovsky Fifth Symphony. One vainly sought for coherency and homogeneousness.” Regarding the MacDowell Concerto, The New York Tribune wrote, “It is a splendid composition, so full of poetry, so full of vigor as to temp the assertion that it must be placed at the head of all works of its kind produced by either a native or an adopted citizen of America.” In Europe, however, critics complained that the work was “too Lisztian.” Liszt had been the composer’s friend and a strong promoter of his music. Their admiration was mutual.
In 1888, MacDowell and his wife Marian Nevins, a former piano student, decided to return to the United States to live in Boston. Two years previously, he and his wife had bought a summer home, Hillcrest Farm, in Peterborough, New Hampshire. In 1896, he became the first chairman of the Music Department at Columbia University until 1904. In 1907, Marian established the MacDowell Colony for artists, composers and writers, deeding Hillcrest Farm for this purpose. The Colony became a huge success thanks to Andrew Carnegie, J.P Morgan, Grover Cleveland, and many donors who supported its mission, a blending of artistic talents. There are now dozens of buildings in the colony on 450 acres, and it is on the National Register of Historical Landmarks.
Opus 23 is built in traditional sonata-allegro structure but unusual in that its tempo marking Larghetto calmato indicated that a slow pace came first. A dreamlike, nostalgic theme begins immediately in the violins followed by horns. When the soloist enters with a stunning, extensive cadenza, it is clear that the composer has big ideas on hand for the pianist. Eventually, this melts into a slow recall of the main idea from violins, flute and horns with pizzicato celli. Again, the pianist re-enters with another massive display and amplification of preceding themes, exciting the orchestra into a brilliant response. With its soaring lyricism, magnificent coloration, and alluring passion, the opening movement is clearly committed to romantic ideals, drama, power, and exuberance. In its dream-like passages, it also speaks to the Romantic ideals of intimacy and tenderness.
For his second movement, MacDowell produces a presto giocoso (fast moving) dazzling scherzo in rondo form. It contains three themes, which had been destined for a symphonic poem about Beatrice and Benedict, referencing Shakespeare’s Much Ado about Nothing, the first Shakespeare play the composer and his wife had seen in England. According to his wife, “He favored the mischievous demons or elves that fly in clouds through the air like pixies they were light gossamer nothings, delicate as a feather, wafted by swift March breezes.”
MacDowell’s friend and pupil, Mr. T.P. Currier, noted, “his finger velocity was the most striking characteristic of his playing… he took to prestissimo like a duck to water… One of his ever present fears was that his fingers would run away with him!” This movement demands formidable technique, strength, and crisp articulations. The closing marked piu mosso (faster) is definitely pixie-like: marked ppp, the pianist plays a passage of light broken chords, capped by two swift little arpeggios and a light staccato chord over pizzicato strings: the movement simply disappears.
The final movement opens slowly, marked Largo. Low strings preface the soloist’s quiet response. The two forces blend in before the pianist delivers the massive first theme. After spinning trills, the music shifts to a jolly, faster pace (molto allegro) expanding the ideas into dramatic relief. The main theme of the first movement returns for a final bow before three faster ideas are introduced. Midpoint, the music moves into a thoughtful lento segment, but with the soloist leading the way, MacDowell ignites the last section into huge orchestral climaxes, pianistic fireworks, galloping toward a massive closing chord. Marianne Williams Tobias
Art by Felix Vallotton Edward MacDowell - Piano Concerto No. 2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ygg7MQ6WC6c/mqdefault.jpg)

![Robert Parris - Concerto for Trombone
Concerto for Trombone, with winds, percussion, piano and strings (1964)
I. Nocturne
II. Perpetual Motion [8:55]
Roman Siwek, trombone
Polish National Radio Orchestra
Ldzistan Szostak
The Concerto for Trombone’s vivid atmospheric content is only hinted by the titles of its two movements, Nocture and Perpetual Motion. The first is an eldritch fantasy punctuated by furious thunderclaps, the second a sweeping, almost macabre romp.
Asked to comment on the music, Mr. Parris replied: ‘‘l feel that an oversimplified discussion of technical considerations can be less of a guide than a trap. Recreating form and content should be the listener’s pleasure; to rely on the composers view of his own work might lead an intelligent listener to over-esteem elements of the music which might, and perhaps should, be of secondary significance. In any case it was neither the structure nor the material that sparked the intense creative drive which persisted during the six weeks of composition, but rather the medium itself, the sonorous possibilities of which I found endlessly fascinating. To this excitement of the imagination was added the exhilaration of being able to pull out all the stops, to take advantage of the technical prowess of a virtuoso trombonist.”
The Concerto was written in January and February of 1964 for Mr. Gutter and Ivan Romanenko, conductor of the (now defunct) Washington Chamber Orchestra. These forces combined to give the piece its first performance in September of 1964 at the Arena Stage, in Washington, D. C. [CRI 231 USD]
Art by Penny Siopis Robert Parris - Concerto for Trombone](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yyN08F7qoV4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Gyula Dávid - String Quartet
String Quartet (1962)
I. Allegro
II. Andante tranquillo [4:26]
III. Vivace [12:23]
Tátrai Quartet
Gyula Dávid’s String Quartet composed in 1962 for the eightieth birthday of Zoltan Kodaly is practically an expression of the great homage the former pupil is paying to his master. Though based on dodecaphony some elements of construction, its forming and a Hungarian rhythm make the work akin to the traditional Hungarian school. Out of its three movements, the first is a sonata of individual interpretation rich in contrasts,— the second series of lyrical-dramatical in variations, and in the closing quick rondo there appear also bagpipe figurations the bass. [LPX 1227]
Art by Janos Kujbus Gyula Dávid - String Quartet](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z56ndnMZxWU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Roger Reynolds - ...the serpent-snapping eye
...the serpent-snapping eye, for trumpet, percussion, piano and 4-channel tape (1978)
Edwin Harkins, trumpet
Cecil Lytle, piano
Daryl Pratt, percussion
The work is twenty minutes long, divided into three roughly equal sections. In the first, the primary aim of the performers is to match, submit to and intensify the taped sounds. The second, in which the synthesized sounds are sparse, introduces a felling of independence as the performers respond, reflecting on models provided by the tape. In the final section, the live performers complement and elaborate upon they attempt to augment the synthesized sound. [rogerreynolds.bandcamp.com]
Art by J. M. W. Turner Roger Reynolds - ...the serpent-snapping eye](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z9QWGDLUWAY/mqdefault.jpg)


![Louise Talma - Six Etudes for Piano
Six Etudes for Piano (1953-54)
I. Allegro — for contrasts (to Thornton Wilder)
II. Prestissimo — for staccato (for Estelle Mershler)
III. Allegro — for sostenuto pedal (to John Edmunds)
IV. Allegro — for wide skips (to Paul Nordoff)
V. Allegretto grazioso — for crossed hands (for Guiomar Novaes)
VI. Molto adagio — for increase of notes per beat (to Beveridge Webster)
Beveridge Webster, piano
Louise Talma is Professor of Music at Hunter College of the City University of New York. She is the first woman to receive two Guggenheim Fellowships and the Sibelius Medal awarded to her in London. She has composed in all forms for orchestra, solo, a piano concerto and an opera “The Alcestiad” (libretto by Thornton Wilder) which was produced in 1962 at Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany, where it received eight performances. [DC 7117 STEREO]
Art by Farah Atassi Louise Talma - Six Etudes for Piano](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ztkhRKawp04/mqdefault.jpg)