Uploaded April 2024 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Growth Kills asserts that the main obstacle standing between us and avoiding runaway climate heating is our blind pursuit of infinite economic growth.
Our so-called "leaders" keep repeating the lie that GDP growth is compatible with the necessary ecological transition, yet it has been proven that there is no current (and likely no future) way to disconnect GDP growth and resource use from increased greenhouse gas emissions*.
Elected officials are promising "green technofixes" that are either unproven, overly expensive, unable to be scaled up, or a mixture of all three—and which will only further accelerate inequality.
Fantasy-based solutions (e.g., carbon capture and storage) are just another way to funnel billions into the pockets of the wealthy— money that could be better spent on proven mitigations to curb emissions and protect us all.
Such lies serve to dangerously placate the public by telling them what they want to hear: "nothing about your life has to change".
Another lie is that economic growth results in human well-being: studies have shown that beyond a baseline level, there isn’t any correlation between economic growth and human development or happiness.
GDP is only a narrow measure of the welfare of capitalism, not the welfare of people.
Do we want to keep accelerating profits for the few or create well-being for all?
There is only one real, adult, logical solution: to produce and consume drastically less.
Unlike planetary boundaries, which are governed by natural law, our economic system is a choice, and we have the power to choose a better economic system that actually values and supports life.
We can either choose between a controlled reduction of unnecessary sectors, goods, and jobs, or witness the horrendous collapse of everything we need.
For more information, including Growth Kills' list of demands, please visit growthkills.org
*iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a
Growth Kills asserts that the main obstacle standing between us and avoiding runaway climate heating is our blind pursuit of infinite economic growth.
Our so-called "leaders" keep repeating the lie that GDP growth is compatible with the necessary ecological transition, yet it has been proven that there is no current (and likely no future) way to disconnect GDP growth and resource use from increased greenhouse gas emissions*.
Elected officials are promising "green technofixes" that are either unproven, overly expensive, unable to be scaled up, or a mixture of all three—and which will only further accelerate inequality.
Fantasy-based solutions (e.g., carbon capture and storage) are just another way to funnel billions into the pockets of the wealthy— money that could be better spent on proven mitigations to curb emissions and protect us all.
Such lies serve to dangerously placate the public by telling them what they want to hear: "nothing about your life has to change".
Another lie is that economic growth results in human well-being: studies have shown that beyond a baseline level, there isn’t any correlation between economic growth and human development or happiness.
GDP is only a narrow measure of the welfare of capitalism, not the welfare of people.
Do we want to keep accelerating profits for the few or create well-being for all?
There is only one real, adult, logical solution: to produce and consume drastically less.
Unlike planetary boundaries, which are governed by natural law, our economic system is a choice, and we have the power to choose a better economic system that actually values and supports life.
We can either choose between a controlled reduction of unnecessary sectors, goods, and jobs, or witness the horrendous collapse of everything we need.
For more information, including Growth Kills' list of demands, please visit growthkills.org
*iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a








![Talk: What Artificial Intelligence Means for Politics, Civil Society, and the Climate
In this talk, Denise Utochkin zooms out of ChatGPT and takes a look at Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a sociotechnical system and political project dating back 70 years.
Denise presents an analysis of AI as an articulation of capitalist, white supremacist, and state violence and demonstrates that many negative side-effects of this set of technologies are not a bug, but a feature. Among them its growing contribution to the climate collapse, its reliance on blood minerals and devalued, traumatizing labour, its gleeful adoption by authoritarian regimes and greedy corporations.
Based on this analysis, Denise argues that as climate activists, we have an imperative to oppose, resist, and refuse AI and that doing so may open up new possibilities for mitigating the worst excesses of the ongoing climate breakdown.
Video recorded 4 June 2025 for Scientist Rebellion Denmark at Greenpeace premises, Njalsgade, Copenhagen. Video recorded and edited by Henning Husum.
REFERENCES FOR SLIDES:
#4:
Similar to photo in article: Denmark’s first AI supercomputer is now operational. (2024-10-23). Novo Nordisk Foundation. https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/denmarks-first-ai-supercomputer-is-now-operational/ (Accessed 2025-06-08).
#5:
Image at top of: Crawford, K., & Joler, V. (2018-09-07). Anatomy of an AI System—The Amazon Echo As An Anatomical Map of Human Labor, Data and Planetary Resources. Anatomy of an AI System. https://anatomyof.ai/ (Accessed 2025-06-08).
#7:
al Hammada, R. (2024). „If I Had Another Job, I Would Not Accept Data Annotation Tasks„: How Syrian Refugees in Lebanon Train AI. In: M. Miceli, A. Dinika, K. Kauffman, C. Salim Wagner, & L. Sachenbacher (eds.), The Data Workers‘ Inquiry. https://data-workers.org/roukaya/. (Accessed 2025-06-09). With CC BY 4.0. license
#9:
Guerra-Pujol, F. E. (2017-11-21). A Bayesian approach to the trolley problem? (Mini-thought experiment). Prior Probability. https://priorprobability.com/2017/11/21/a-bayesian-approach-to-the-trolley-problem-mini-thought-experiment/ (Accessed 2025-06-08). With CC BY-NC 3.0 license
#19:
Data centre power consumption graph from The Big Take. (2024-06-21). AI Is Already Wreaking Havoc on Global Power Systems. Blomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-ai-data-centers-power-grids/ (Accessed 2025-06-09).
#21:
Image is from the report mentioned in footnote[1]. It has CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
#31:
The two images can be found in Kirkebæk-Johansson, L. (2025-04-11). Israelsk militær og Det Hvide Hus hopper med på kontroversiel AI-trend. DR. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/kultur/israelsk-militaer-og-det-hvide-hus-hopper-med-paa-kontroversiel-ai-trend (Accessed 2025-06-09).
#32:
Figure from Wenger, E. (2024). AI produces gibberish when trained on too much AI-generated data. Nature, 631(8022), 742–743. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02355-z
#39:
Degrowth drawing originates from https://degrowth.info/es/blog/how-to-participate-in-global-degrowth-day. With CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
#44:
Figure from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_pudding_model. With CC BY 4.0. license Talk: What Artificial Intelligence Means for Politics, Civil Society, and the Climate](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zNMh-7-npNk/mqdefault.jpg)
