Uploaded January 2019 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
In the second part of our conversation, Shadi Hamid and I get into a conversation about the contradictions of liberal universality. Should we want Islamists to become liberals for instance? Shadi argues for a liberalism that can appeal to the most possible people and I argue that, given we can never escape contestable premises, a liberalism based on progress best makes sense of these contradictions.
Download from the website:
politicalphilosophypodcast.com
Subscribe on iTunes
itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/political-philosophy-podcast/id1365725211?mt=2
Support on patreon
patreon.com/PoliticalPhilosophyPodcast
In the second part of our conversation, Shadi Hamid and I get into a conversation about the contradictions of liberal universality. Should we want Islamists to become liberals for instance? Shadi argues for a liberalism that can appeal to the most possible people and I argue that, given we can never escape contestable premises, a liberalism based on progress best makes sense of these contradictions.
Download from the website:
politicalphilosophypodcast.com
Subscribe on iTunes
itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/political-philosophy-podcast/id1365725211?mt=2
Support on patreon
patreon.com/PoliticalPhilosophyPodcast










