Riot Glass vs Scott Beerer | Who Will Win? @RiotGlass

Uploaded May 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago

We test A LOT here at Riot Glass to be sure we are bringing you top shelf premium security products. Today we paired the AP25 security glazing system with Scott Beerer - Vice President here at Riot Glass, Inc.

Prior to his career with us, Scott was a 1st team consensus all American utility player at Texas A&M. Meaning he hit and pitched which is extremely rare. Scott was drafted 2nd round as a pitcher to the Colorado Rockies. After a shoulder surgery ended his pitching career he came back as a hitter in the Baltimore Orioles Organization. Career .305 batting average.
Watch Scott punish our flagship access denial glazing system to no avail! It was a valiant effort, Scott. We will see you again soon in another test.

Visit us at:
riotglass.com
800-580-2303
info@riotglass.com

National service for commercial, schools, & government projects.

Riot Glass vs Scott Beerer | Who Will Win?

Stopping a .30-06 Rifle Round | Riot Glass

Invisible Storefront Security | Riot Glass | 800-580-2303

Riot Glass Laboratory Testing - AP Series | 800-580-2303

Riot Glass Case Study | Testimonial | 800-580-2303

$Why Glass Is the Weakest Link in Building Security | ASTM F3561, F1233, F3038 Explained When most people think about building security, they focus on locks, alarms, cameras, or guards. But in most forced entry events, the first point of failure is the same: the glass. Standard tempered and annealed storefront glazing is designed for safety, not security. Once it fractures, immediate access is created. Criminals understand this. Breaking glass is faster than defeating locks. In this video, we break down the critical difference between: • Time-delay / access denial glazing • Ballistic protection (UL 752) • Active assailant simulation testing (ASTM F3561) • Violent forced entry standards (ASTM F1233) • Organized mob assault testing (ASTM F3038) ASTM F3561 simulates ballistic assault followed by blunt-force attack to determine whether glazing remains anchored and prevents a reach-through opening. ASTM F1233 evaluates extreme manual forced entry using heavy tools. ASTM F3038 represents coordinated multi-attacker assault over sustained attack cycles. Not all ballistic glass provides meaningful forced entry resistance. Not all forced entry products are ballistic. And fragment retention film is not engineered access denial. Security glazing is not one-size-fits-all. The correct system depends on threat profile, occupancy, risk tolerance, and budget. Because when it comes to forced entry events, the real question is not whether you have glass security. It is whether that glazing buys enough time to meaningfully protect lives and property. #BuildingSecurity #SecurityGlass #ForcedEntry #AccessDenial #ASTMF3561 #ASTMF1233 #ASTMF3038 #UL752 #BallisticGlass #StorefrontSecurity #ArchitecturalSecurity #PhysicalSecurity #Glazing$

Your Doors May Not Be As Secure As You Think