Uploaded June 2009 | Updated September 2026, 9 hours ago
This is also (along with a rough transcript) available on my blog:
http:///rabidape.net
rabidape.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=106:believeorburnjohnmarcusre001&catid=24:godtheism&Itemid=3
this video is posted in response to this one:
youtube.com/watch?v=R-GZ81AzrZ8
Feel free to copy, mirror, remix, and adapt this video, but please provide a link back here, and/or to http://www.rabidape.net,just follow this license:
license:
tinyurl.com/rabidapelicense
This is also (along with a rough transcript) available on my blog:
http:///rabidape.net
rabidape.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=106:believeorburnjohnmarcusre001&catid=24:godtheism&Itemid=3
this video is posted in response to this one:
youtube.com/watch?v=R-GZ81AzrZ8
Feel free to copy, mirror, remix, and adapt this video, but please provide a link back here, and/or to http://www.rabidape.net,just follow this license:
license:
tinyurl.com/rabidapelicense
![Triumphs and Challenges for Modern Cosmology - James Peebles
mirror of a video posted by uctelevision:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFBLoGRSwpA
Join James Peebles, one of the worlds foremost cosmologists, as he explores the universe. Like fossils, thermal radiation carries information about the past, in this case the nature of the early universe. This information has confirmed ideas about the expanding universe, and it has presented us with new challenges. In particular, dark matter and dark energy. Series: UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures [2/2007] [Science] [Show ID: 12005]
I cannot find any licensing information for this clip, but it seems that UCs default policy falls within the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No derivatives license. I have good faith that reposting this video here for educational purposes is in accordance with the spirit of UCs broad intentions. I have written to uctelevision, and will be happy to remove this video at their request. Triumphs and Challenges for Modern Cosmology - James Peebles](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nDl80siQxQM/mqdefault.jpg)









![a polite challenge for VFX (clarification)
***please pass this along to that one guy and his viewers***
heheheheh
:P
response to/clarification of:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdsE78gqO54
which was a response to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11ajMxhpqkA
VFX says:
While I appreciate your sense of humor, your latest video is way off the mark.
I dont feel the need to [answer the question], your accusations are without merit.
cang00 says:
RabidApe, of course he didnt approve the response. Why should he with as corrosive a title as that? Theres a lot you could complain about VFX but in this case its an unfair bit of slander.
RabidApe says:
Its not slanderous to ask a question - and the question cuts to the very core of his thesis.
I explain in the video that I think the answer to the question How many people has VFX murdered? is probably zero.
What Im really curious about is:
If believing in evolution gives you no reason not to be a thief, rapist, or murderer, then WHAT WAS IT that kept him from doing so all those years that he supposedly DID believe in evolution?
to his/her credit, cang00 says:
I admit that I did not watch the video to the point in which you asked the question. Its a very poignant question. So poignant in fact that I think you should make a separate video with the above title just to address it, rather than bury it at the end of a 25 minute rebuttal. It makes it appear as though youve purposely created a slanderous headline just to attract views.
You know, kind of like when VFX left YouTube.
Isnt reasonable discourse a beautiful thing?
thunderf00t on VFXs comeback:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYulHW1juGQ a polite challenge for VFX (clarification)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qorg0hGuImw/mqdefault.jpg)