Uploaded August 2008 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
***please pass this along to that one guy and his viewers***
heheheheh
:P
response to/clarification of:
youtube.com/watch?v=OdsE78gqO54
which was a response to:
youtube.com/watch?v=11ajMxhpqkA
VFX says:
"While I appreciate your sense of humor, your latest video is way off the mark."
"I don't feel the need to [answer the question], your accusations are without merit. "
cang00 says:
"RabidApe, of course he didn't approve the response. Why should he with as corrosive a title as that? There's a lot you could complain about VFX but in this case it's an unfair bit of slander."
RabidApe says:
"It's not slanderous to ask a question - and the question cuts to the very core of his 'thesis'.
I explain in the video that I think the answer to the question 'How many people has VFX murdered?' is probably zero.
What I'm really curious about is:
If believing in evolution gives you 'no reason' not to be a thief, rapist, or murderer, then WHAT WAS IT that kept him from doing so all those years that he supposedly DID believe in evolution?"
to his/her credit, cang00 says:
"I admit that I did not watch the video to the point in which you asked the question. It's a very poignant question. So poignant in fact that I think you should make a separate video with the above title just to address it, rather than bury it at the end of a 25 minute rebuttal. It makes it appear as though you've purposely created a slanderous headline just to attract views.
You know, kind of like when VFX 'left' YouTube."
Isn't reasonable discourse a beautiful thing?
thunderf00t on VFXs "comeback":
youtube.com/watch?v=qYulHW1juGQ
***please pass this along to that one guy and his viewers***
heheheheh
:P
response to/clarification of:
youtube.com/watch?v=OdsE78gqO54
which was a response to:
youtube.com/watch?v=11ajMxhpqkA
VFX says:
"While I appreciate your sense of humor, your latest video is way off the mark."
"I don't feel the need to [answer the question], your accusations are without merit. "
cang00 says:
"RabidApe, of course he didn't approve the response. Why should he with as corrosive a title as that? There's a lot you could complain about VFX but in this case it's an unfair bit of slander."
RabidApe says:
"It's not slanderous to ask a question - and the question cuts to the very core of his 'thesis'.
I explain in the video that I think the answer to the question 'How many people has VFX murdered?' is probably zero.
What I'm really curious about is:
If believing in evolution gives you 'no reason' not to be a thief, rapist, or murderer, then WHAT WAS IT that kept him from doing so all those years that he supposedly DID believe in evolution?"
to his/her credit, cang00 says:
"I admit that I did not watch the video to the point in which you asked the question. It's a very poignant question. So poignant in fact that I think you should make a separate video with the above title just to address it, rather than bury it at the end of a 25 minute rebuttal. It makes it appear as though you've purposely created a slanderous headline just to attract views.
You know, kind of like when VFX 'left' YouTube."
Isn't reasonable discourse a beautiful thing?
thunderf00t on VFXs "comeback":
youtube.com/watch?v=qYulHW1juGQ
