Uploaded May 2022 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Could Lake Onslow’s pumped storage scheme be the game-changer New Zealand needs to meet its future electricity requirements?
Earl Bardsley is living proof that one man can make a difference – in this case to New Zealand’s electricity supply.
In 2002, Bardsley, Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Waikato, came up with the idea of using Lake Onslow in Central Otago as a reliable power storage facility to meet the country’s electricity needs during dry years.
The ‘dry year problem’ refers to the fact that, although blessed with an abundance of hydro-generating lakes and rivers, New Zealand runs into problems when lake levels are low. At these times, electricity has to be generated by expensive and polluting fossil fuels, which the Government is committed to phasing out by 2030.
“I was always looking for possibilities by which we might get alternative means of storage away from our scenic natural lakes. So that’s why I first started thinking about the Lake Onslow basin,” says Bardsley.
By year’s end, the Government will have decided whether or not to go ahead with the $4 billion project that may well turn Bardsley’s vision into reality. The decision to proceed will be based largely on the findings of a feasibility study known as the NZ Battery Project, the outcome of which will be announced in June 2022.
As Bardsley told Frank Film, at heart of the Lake Onslow scheme is the concept of pumped storage.
“What it amounts to is that we’re using Lake Onslow as a battery,” says Bardsley.
“When the prices are low, and there’s plenty of water around, we’ll pump water up into the lake. When there’s a dry year, we’ll have all this potential energy available which we can run back down to the Clutha River.
“By running it back down we can generate 1000 megawatts, and that means that we can do away with fossil fuel as a source of energy during dry years.”
The Minister of Energy and Resources, Hon Dr Megan Woods, is unequivocal about the significance of the project and what it could mean for the Government’s commitment to New Zealand’s energy being 100% renewable by 2030.
“Look, this will be a game changer. Not only will it enable us to decarbonise, and get to that 100% renewable electricity system, but, more broadly, across our energy system,” Minister Woods tells Frank Film.
As Bardsley further explains, “The example could be the dairy industry, and the production of milk powder, which uses a lot of energy.
If we use that energy from electricity as opposed to, for example, coal, then that’s better for the whole country.”
The magnitude of the project is illustrated in Bardsley's assertion that: “The culmination of the water storage volume, and the height about the Clutha River, means you could have the potential energy up there equal to all the hydro lakes of New Zealand put together.”
Both Bardsley and Minister Woods acknowledge that the wetlands adjacent to Lake Onslow would be a casualty of the project, with Minister Woods also noting that any cultural significance to the local rūnaka will need to be considered and addressed.
Local fisherman, Andrew Moore, indicates to the Frank Film crew the point on the hill where the new lake level would be. In spite of the fact that, should the project go ahead, the hut he’s been coming too for 30 years will need to be moved, he’s philosophical about it (while also not missing an opportunity to have a dig at city dwellers in the north):
“Well, we need it. We’ve got electric cars now! All those Auckanders and Wellingtonians [with] their electric cars plugged in at five o’clock.
“[You’ve] got to get the power from somewhere, don’t you,” says Moore.
No Elon Musk, Earl Bardsely may not fit the mould of today’s visionary hero. But, the sincerity, clarity and intellectual rigour of this old school academic is convincing.
Bardsley’s belief in the project is clear: “It would be good to see the whole thing go ahead. It will change the New Zealand energy scene for the next 50 years.”
Producer/Director: Gerard Smyth
Editor: Oliver Dawe
Story Producer: Rose O'Connor
Production Manager: Jo Ffitch
Sound Mix: Chris Sinclair
Production Asst: Romah Chorley
WATCH OTHER EPISODES HERE: frankfilm.co.nz
Could Lake Onslow’s pumped storage scheme be the game-changer New Zealand needs to meet its future electricity requirements?
Earl Bardsley is living proof that one man can make a difference – in this case to New Zealand’s electricity supply.
In 2002, Bardsley, Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Waikato, came up with the idea of using Lake Onslow in Central Otago as a reliable power storage facility to meet the country’s electricity needs during dry years.
The ‘dry year problem’ refers to the fact that, although blessed with an abundance of hydro-generating lakes and rivers, New Zealand runs into problems when lake levels are low. At these times, electricity has to be generated by expensive and polluting fossil fuels, which the Government is committed to phasing out by 2030.
“I was always looking for possibilities by which we might get alternative means of storage away from our scenic natural lakes. So that’s why I first started thinking about the Lake Onslow basin,” says Bardsley.
By year’s end, the Government will have decided whether or not to go ahead with the $4 billion project that may well turn Bardsley’s vision into reality. The decision to proceed will be based largely on the findings of a feasibility study known as the NZ Battery Project, the outcome of which will be announced in June 2022.
As Bardsley told Frank Film, at heart of the Lake Onslow scheme is the concept of pumped storage.
“What it amounts to is that we’re using Lake Onslow as a battery,” says Bardsley.
“When the prices are low, and there’s plenty of water around, we’ll pump water up into the lake. When there’s a dry year, we’ll have all this potential energy available which we can run back down to the Clutha River.
“By running it back down we can generate 1000 megawatts, and that means that we can do away with fossil fuel as a source of energy during dry years.”
The Minister of Energy and Resources, Hon Dr Megan Woods, is unequivocal about the significance of the project and what it could mean for the Government’s commitment to New Zealand’s energy being 100% renewable by 2030.
“Look, this will be a game changer. Not only will it enable us to decarbonise, and get to that 100% renewable electricity system, but, more broadly, across our energy system,” Minister Woods tells Frank Film.
As Bardsley further explains, “The example could be the dairy industry, and the production of milk powder, which uses a lot of energy.
If we use that energy from electricity as opposed to, for example, coal, then that’s better for the whole country.”
The magnitude of the project is illustrated in Bardsley's assertion that: “The culmination of the water storage volume, and the height about the Clutha River, means you could have the potential energy up there equal to all the hydro lakes of New Zealand put together.”
Both Bardsley and Minister Woods acknowledge that the wetlands adjacent to Lake Onslow would be a casualty of the project, with Minister Woods also noting that any cultural significance to the local rūnaka will need to be considered and addressed.
Local fisherman, Andrew Moore, indicates to the Frank Film crew the point on the hill where the new lake level would be. In spite of the fact that, should the project go ahead, the hut he’s been coming too for 30 years will need to be moved, he’s philosophical about it (while also not missing an opportunity to have a dig at city dwellers in the north):
“Well, we need it. We’ve got electric cars now! All those Auckanders and Wellingtonians [with] their electric cars plugged in at five o’clock.
“[You’ve] got to get the power from somewhere, don’t you,” says Moore.
No Elon Musk, Earl Bardsely may not fit the mould of today’s visionary hero. But, the sincerity, clarity and intellectual rigour of this old school academic is convincing.
Bardsley’s belief in the project is clear: “It would be good to see the whole thing go ahead. It will change the New Zealand energy scene for the next 50 years.”
Producer/Director: Gerard Smyth
Editor: Oliver Dawe
Story Producer: Rose O'Connor
Production Manager: Jo Ffitch
Sound Mix: Chris Sinclair
Production Asst: Romah Chorley
WATCH OTHER EPISODES HERE: frankfilm.co.nz







![Lunch with the candidates
Roald Dahl wrote, ‘Somewhere inside each of us is the power to change the world’. He may have been right, but not many of us have the motivation, nor the guts, to step up and steer the ship. Those running for Christchurch City mayor in the upcoming local elections certainly do, and Frank Film decided to get to know the frontrunners.
At first glance, Phil Mauger and David Meates, the two main contenders for the mayoral seat, are fairly similar. They’re both middle-aged white men. But, whilst there may be no points for diversity in this election, the two candidates are in fact chalk and cheese in character. We joined both Phil and David while they cooked us lunch, and then visited their childhood homes. Phil, 64, who was brought up in North Brighton and lives in Fendalton, made souvlaki. He was under the close supervision of his wife, Chrissie, who watched with some trepidation. “He doesn’t cook often,” Chrissie said, and helped him open the bag of wraps.
Phil explained that they’ve been in their family home for 20 years. “It’s quite big, but we’ve got nine grandchildren, eight of which are under the age of nine,” he said. Phil is a Christchurch city councillor for the Burwood ward, and apart from his work as a city councillor, has spent all of his life working in and running the family business, Maugers Contracting Ltd. He left school in the sixth form. When asked why he was running for mayor, Phil said it’s because he knows he can make a difference. “We’ve got to make sure that [the grandkids] have got a good place to live.”
David, 61, who was brought up in Beckenham, made scrambled eggs on fresh sourdough. “I’m a really basic sort of cook, and really like pretty plain food,” he explained. David cooked on his own at his daughter’s house in Bishopdale as his place was getting renovated. “[I come from] a family of ten kids - I’ve got eight sisters, and I learnt my place very early on in life,” said David, who has a Bachelors in Agricultural Science. He has worked as Chief Executive of both the Canterbury District Health Board (South Island’s largest employer) and the West Coast District Health Board, and said he’s running for mayor after being approached by a range of people looking for a different style of leadership. “That’s in terms of listening and working with communities to solve complex problems,” David explained.
And what about the main issues concerning the people of Christchurch? Over lunch, we peppered each with some quick-fire questions. Their responses proved to be a spotlight on the differences between them. Climate change - are we moving fast enough? “Yes, I think we are, we’ve got the climate emergency, but we’ve got to do things,” said Phil, who’s made a name for himself (namely by going out with his digger and digging a trench without permission in 2020) for ‘getting things done’. “Since then I’ve learnt quite a lot about process,” Phil said of the trench-digging. “If I was doing it again I’d be working hard with council staff to get that done.”
“No,” said David in response to the climate change question, “If this is an emergency we’re not moving particularly quickly.” Last book they read? For Phil, a few pages of Winning Elections by Ronald Faucheux. For David, Calling Bullshit by Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West, about the misuse of data, and Who rules the world by Noam Chomsky. “It’s a terrifying read,” said David, who has only earlier this year broken his silence about his reasons for leaving Canterbury DHB in 2020 after 10 years as chief executive. “We were going to need to make trade-offs about cutting services, and to put it simply I was just not prepared to,” he said.
Cycleways? David was a yes - but also said there are some which aren’t working, and we need to look at why. Phil gave a yes, too, but not to the amount of money we’re spending on them. Both had ridden their bikes recently: Phil on his electric one a couple of months ago, David citing himself as a regular cyclist.
In response to the results of a recent resident survey, which showed council approval rates were the lowest they’d been in 15 years, their differences were again apparent through their strategies for improvement. David brought up his long history of working with teams. “If you can create the right culture and the right environment, it’s amazing what organisations are able to do,” he said. For Phil, the plan if he is elected is to get out in amongst the people at least once a fortnight.
Both identify as Christian; David goes to church ‘periodically’, Phil, ‘not a lot’. Both hope to be remembered as neither right nor left leaning, with David citing experience working with both. We then asked each what power the mayor had. “One vote,” said Phil, “But it’s up to the mayor to get everyone pulling the rope in the same direction.” For David, the mayor represents the moral authority of the community. “In terms of helping set the tone for how a group of councillors need to work and operate,” he said. Lunch with the candidates](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JoxoSy1A5Y4/mqdefault.jpg)


