No Avail | Political Essentialism As Anterior Identitarianism @No_Avail | Uploaded November 2021 | Updated October 2024, 16 hours ago.
The malleability of political attitudes – Full: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/80023626/strandberg_thesis.pdf
Abstract only: https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/493f3f22-a664-4909-b427-d3ab3c95f34d
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America: nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01012-5
Democrats and Republicans found to be equally susceptible to false attitude feedback: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001898
Abstract – “Party over Policy” modes of analytic distortion: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14599246
Related: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30148387
Somehow I failed to highlight the following crucial part from the above link during the video, which I really wanted to do, so here goes: “In addition, we found that participants' analytical skill correlated with their correction of the manipulation, whereas political involvement did not. This study contributes to the understanding of how confabulatory reasoning and self-perceptive processes can interact in lasting attitude change. It also highlights how political expressions can be both stable in the context of everyday life, yet flexible when argumentative processes are engaged.”
Health and exercise contribute to preserving a well-ordered society: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1527002517717299
Or as they put it: “The Effects of Physical Activity on Social Interactions: The Case of Trust and Trustworthiness”
Fun sad-fact: No past or present foundationalist political theory lists “health + exercise” of the to-be-governed population as one of its normative building blocks. Major setback.
Yes, I checked: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies
They’re making lemon-free lemonade, all of them. Do not drink.
Contextualism full: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11158-017-9358-1
A Variety Of Contexts in Contextualism as a method: https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/53735
Psychologism, or what Haidt does: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/psychologism/
Didn’t get around to this one at all: bbc.com/future/article/20170118-how-east-and-west-think-in-profoundly-different-ways
“How East and West think in profoundly different ways”
Relevant read because Haidt insists that The Big Five personality model and its political implications apply to electorates worldwide. That’s absurd, and this one article clinches it.
SEP stuff:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-character-empirical/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/
I’ll have more to say about these two (barely skimmed in the video) entries at a later time.
I'll also proofread all of this and add any source that might currently be missing. Let me know if you spotted anything that I may've left out.
The malleability of political attitudes – Full: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/80023626/strandberg_thesis.pdf
Abstract only: https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/493f3f22-a664-4909-b427-d3ab3c95f34d
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America: nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01012-5
Democrats and Republicans found to be equally susceptible to false attitude feedback: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001898
Abstract – “Party over Policy” modes of analytic distortion: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14599246
Related: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30148387
Somehow I failed to highlight the following crucial part from the above link during the video, which I really wanted to do, so here goes: “In addition, we found that participants' analytical skill correlated with their correction of the manipulation, whereas political involvement did not. This study contributes to the understanding of how confabulatory reasoning and self-perceptive processes can interact in lasting attitude change. It also highlights how political expressions can be both stable in the context of everyday life, yet flexible when argumentative processes are engaged.”
Health and exercise contribute to preserving a well-ordered society: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1527002517717299
Or as they put it: “The Effects of Physical Activity on Social Interactions: The Case of Trust and Trustworthiness”
Fun sad-fact: No past or present foundationalist political theory lists “health + exercise” of the to-be-governed population as one of its normative building blocks. Major setback.
Yes, I checked: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies
They’re making lemon-free lemonade, all of them. Do not drink.
Contextualism full: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11158-017-9358-1
A Variety Of Contexts in Contextualism as a method: https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/53735
Psychologism, or what Haidt does: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/psychologism/
Didn’t get around to this one at all: bbc.com/future/article/20170118-how-east-and-west-think-in-profoundly-different-ways
“How East and West think in profoundly different ways”
Relevant read because Haidt insists that The Big Five personality model and its political implications apply to electorates worldwide. That’s absurd, and this one article clinches it.
SEP stuff:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-character-empirical/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/
I’ll have more to say about these two (barely skimmed in the video) entries at a later time.
I'll also proofread all of this and add any source that might currently be missing. Let me know if you spotted anything that I may've left out.
