Uploaded May 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Leif Segerstam.
I - Promenade. Allegro giusto, nel modo rustico, senza allegrezza, ma poco sostenuto - (attacca): 0:00
II - 1. Gnomus. Sempre vivo: 1:42
III - Promenade. Moderato commodo assai e con delicatezza: 4:43
IV - 2. Il Vecchio Castello. Andantino molto cantabile e con dolore: 5:47
V - Promenade. Moderato non tanto, pesamente - (attacca): 10:48
VI - 3. Tuileries. Allegretto non troppo, capriccioso: 11:21
VII - 4. Bydlo. Sempre moderato, pesante: 12:30
VIII - Promenade. Tranquillo - (attacca): 15:51
IX - 5. Ballet of the Chickens in their Shells: Scherzino. vivo, leggiero: 16:35
X - 6. Samuel Goldenberg and Schmuyle. Andante - Andante grave: 17:56
XI - Promenade. Allegro giusto, nel modo russico, poco sostenuto - (attacca): 20:44
XII - 7. Limoges - The Market Place. Allegretto vivo, sempre scherzando - (attacca): 22:23
XIII - 8. Catacombae. Largo - (attacca): 23:45
XIV - Cum mortuis in lingua mortua. Andante non troppo, con lamento: 25:34
XV - 9. The Hut on Fowl's Legs (Baba-Yaga). Allegro con brio, feroce - Andante mosso - Allegro molto - (attacca): 27:48
XVI - 10. The Great Gate of Kiev. Allegro alla breve. Maestoso. Con grandezza: 31:11
Mussorgsky's "Pictures at an Exhibition" was composed between June 2-22 of 1874, during his creative peak after the premiere of the opera "Goris Godunov". It was written after the death of Russian artist and close friend Viktor Hartmann, after which an exhibition of Hartmann’s pictures was organised in the Academy of Fine Arts in St Petersburg. Mussorgsky went to the exhibition and was inspired to compose his piano piece in memory of his friend. Both Mussorgsky and Hartmann, as kindred spirits, were part of an emerging Nationalistic trend in Russian art. It was probably premiered by Mussorgsky himself in one of his piano recitals.
"Pictures at an Exhibition" describes someone walking round the exhibition and looking at the pictures, by far Mussorgsky's most ambitious solo piano piece. The ten pictures that are musically described were drawings and watercolours. Vladimir Stasov, to whom the work is dedicated, wrote brief descriptions for each section. Some of Hartmann’s original pictures are now lost, but six have been identified with the movements of Mussorgsky’s suite. It was published in 1886, five years after Mussorgsky's death in a version slightly edited by Rimsky-Korsakov. The original version was restored in a 1931 critical edition.
As early as 1886, many composers and musicians have realised several arrangements for virtually any kind of combination of instruments and ensembles. Slovenian composer Leo Funtek published his orchestration on July 1922, while he was working in Finland an three month's before the premiere of Ravel's own. It is notable for being the first orchestration of the piece that preserves all its movements. In terms of colour, Funtek's arrangement can be described as more conservative and less virtuosic, but also more faithful to the character of Mussorgsky's original piano version (with the small Rimsky-Korsakov addendums). It languished in obscurity until it was playe in foreign tours of the Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra.
The work opens with a "Promenade" in 5/4; a portrayal of the composer himself walking from one painting to the next. The first picture is "Gnomus," inspired by a design for a toy nutcracker that Hartmann drew in 1869. It leads to "The Old Castle," a mysterious, lonely evocation built on pedal nones. "Tuileries" is inspired by a watercolor of children at play in the garden of the Tuileries. This bright and impressionistic piece is followed by the heavy tread of "Cattle" (a Polish oxcart). The "Ballet of the Unhatched Chicks" is a wildly imaginative scherzo. A stern melody in a Jewish-music-derived scale opens "Samuel Goldenberg and Schmuyle," in which a wealthy Jew is portrayed by a severe theme contrasted by a lamenting one from the poor jew.
The rapid patter of haggling housewives characterizes "The Market Place in Limoges." In another sudden change in mood, "Catacombs," which pictures Hartmann himself touring a vast catacomb of skulls, is rendered in naked chord progressions. "The Hut on Fowl's Legs (Baba-Yaga)" was inspired by Hartmann's design for a fourteenth century-style clock in the shape of a witch's hat. Mussorgsky transforms it into a miniature tone poem about Baba Yaga, the legendary Russian witch who devoured the souls of children. After a grand flourish, the work ends with "The Great Gate of Kiev," inspired by a never-implemented design Hartmann submitted to an architecture competition. Pictures of an Exhibition comes to a close with a majestic series of chords.
Pictures: Remaining pictures by Hartmann.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ysovtzs2, tinyurl.com/yrwh886u and tinyurl.com/26r93ldw
Score: tinyurl.com/y9utobbb
Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted by Leif Segerstam.
I - Promenade. Allegro giusto, nel modo rustico, senza allegrezza, ma poco sostenuto - (attacca): 0:00
II - 1. Gnomus. Sempre vivo: 1:42
III - Promenade. Moderato commodo assai e con delicatezza: 4:43
IV - 2. Il Vecchio Castello. Andantino molto cantabile e con dolore: 5:47
V - Promenade. Moderato non tanto, pesamente - (attacca): 10:48
VI - 3. Tuileries. Allegretto non troppo, capriccioso: 11:21
VII - 4. Bydlo. Sempre moderato, pesante: 12:30
VIII - Promenade. Tranquillo - (attacca): 15:51
IX - 5. Ballet of the Chickens in their Shells: Scherzino. vivo, leggiero: 16:35
X - 6. Samuel Goldenberg and Schmuyle. Andante - Andante grave: 17:56
XI - Promenade. Allegro giusto, nel modo russico, poco sostenuto - (attacca): 20:44
XII - 7. Limoges - The Market Place. Allegretto vivo, sempre scherzando - (attacca): 22:23
XIII - 8. Catacombae. Largo - (attacca): 23:45
XIV - Cum mortuis in lingua mortua. Andante non troppo, con lamento: 25:34
XV - 9. The Hut on Fowl's Legs (Baba-Yaga). Allegro con brio, feroce - Andante mosso - Allegro molto - (attacca): 27:48
XVI - 10. The Great Gate of Kiev. Allegro alla breve. Maestoso. Con grandezza: 31:11
Mussorgsky's "Pictures at an Exhibition" was composed between June 2-22 of 1874, during his creative peak after the premiere of the opera "Goris Godunov". It was written after the death of Russian artist and close friend Viktor Hartmann, after which an exhibition of Hartmann’s pictures was organised in the Academy of Fine Arts in St Petersburg. Mussorgsky went to the exhibition and was inspired to compose his piano piece in memory of his friend. Both Mussorgsky and Hartmann, as kindred spirits, were part of an emerging Nationalistic trend in Russian art. It was probably premiered by Mussorgsky himself in one of his piano recitals.
"Pictures at an Exhibition" describes someone walking round the exhibition and looking at the pictures, by far Mussorgsky's most ambitious solo piano piece. The ten pictures that are musically described were drawings and watercolours. Vladimir Stasov, to whom the work is dedicated, wrote brief descriptions for each section. Some of Hartmann’s original pictures are now lost, but six have been identified with the movements of Mussorgsky’s suite. It was published in 1886, five years after Mussorgsky's death in a version slightly edited by Rimsky-Korsakov. The original version was restored in a 1931 critical edition.
As early as 1886, many composers and musicians have realised several arrangements for virtually any kind of combination of instruments and ensembles. Slovenian composer Leo Funtek published his orchestration on July 1922, while he was working in Finland an three month's before the premiere of Ravel's own. It is notable for being the first orchestration of the piece that preserves all its movements. In terms of colour, Funtek's arrangement can be described as more conservative and less virtuosic, but also more faithful to the character of Mussorgsky's original piano version (with the small Rimsky-Korsakov addendums). It languished in obscurity until it was playe in foreign tours of the Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra.
The work opens with a "Promenade" in 5/4; a portrayal of the composer himself walking from one painting to the next. The first picture is "Gnomus," inspired by a design for a toy nutcracker that Hartmann drew in 1869. It leads to "The Old Castle," a mysterious, lonely evocation built on pedal nones. "Tuileries" is inspired by a watercolor of children at play in the garden of the Tuileries. This bright and impressionistic piece is followed by the heavy tread of "Cattle" (a Polish oxcart). The "Ballet of the Unhatched Chicks" is a wildly imaginative scherzo. A stern melody in a Jewish-music-derived scale opens "Samuel Goldenberg and Schmuyle," in which a wealthy Jew is portrayed by a severe theme contrasted by a lamenting one from the poor jew.
The rapid patter of haggling housewives characterizes "The Market Place in Limoges." In another sudden change in mood, "Catacombs," which pictures Hartmann himself touring a vast catacomb of skulls, is rendered in naked chord progressions. "The Hut on Fowl's Legs (Baba-Yaga)" was inspired by Hartmann's design for a fourteenth century-style clock in the shape of a witch's hat. Mussorgsky transforms it into a miniature tone poem about Baba Yaga, the legendary Russian witch who devoured the souls of children. After a grand flourish, the work ends with "The Great Gate of Kiev," inspired by a never-implemented design Hartmann submitted to an architecture competition. Pictures of an Exhibition comes to a close with a majestic series of chords.
Pictures: Remaining pictures by Hartmann.
Sources: tinyurl.com/ysovtzs2, tinyurl.com/yrwh886u and tinyurl.com/26r93ldw
Score: tinyurl.com/y9utobbb


![Symphony No.1 in A-flat major - Edward Elgar
London Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Georg Solti.
I - Andante. Nobilmente e semplice - Allegro - Poco meno mosso - Poco più mosso - Tempo I - Poco animato - Grandioso (Tempo I) - Meno mosso - Poco più mosso - Tempo I - Poco meno mosso: 0:00
II - Allegro molto - (attacca): 17:48
III - Adagio - Molto espressivo e sostenuto: 24:55
IV - Lento - Allegro - Grandioso (poco largamente): 37:11
Elgars Symphony No.1 was composed between June 1907 and September 1908. It was premiered on December 3 of 1908, performed by the Hallé Orchestra conducted by Hans Richter. The work was very-well received and was performed more than a hundred times the first year, being considered by many as the first great English symphony. Elgar, who for ten years was unsure to write a symphony, was then considered as the most important composer of the period in England.
Elgar’s only public statement about the meaning of his symphony was that There is no program beyond a wide experience of human life with a great charity (love) and a massive hope in the future. He also told one friend that it was a reflex or picture or elucidation of his life and to another he confided I am really alone in this music. The symphony is ambitious in scale and scope, with a complexity that was quite new for Elgar at the time, despite the vast choral canvasses he had already achieved. Musically, the work’s style was influenced by Wagner, constructed on a web of interrelated themes and motives.
The first movement is structured in an expansive sonata form. It begins with a slow introduction, with a noble and solemn theme that is quietly introduced by violas and wood before taken by full orchestra. This theme will reappear through the whole work. The main allegro opens with a passionate and nervous main theme on strings and woods, passing to the horns. It is contrasted by a lyrical and tender second theme, constructed over three motives on multiple instruments. The main theme is brought back and is answered by a menacing brass motive. The calm reappearance of the noble opening theme leads us to the extensive development section, which veers between the intensely dramatic and the deeply lyrical, culminating in a central climax. The noble theme on cello and horn leads us to the recapitulation of the main themes. The main theme is repeated, answered again by the ominous brass motive. The opening theme reappears once more at the end of the movement, at first only played by the last desks of the string section amid fragmentary reminiscences of other themes. A slow coda ends with a quiet reminiscence of the fateful motif.
The second movement is a scherzo structured as a sonata-rondo. It opens with an agitated and rushed main theme on strings, which is the reversed version of the noble opening theme. It is followed by an imperious and sinister march as a second theme, reminiscent of Elgars own Pomp and Circumstance marches. The trio section features a lyrical theme of pastoral nature on the woodwinds. The scherzo is then continued, before the trio material reappears in form of a development, to which the scherzo material is soon added. The music gradually calms down, with hints of the noble theme, leading us directly into the adagio.
The third movement is very free in form. It begins with a deeply lyrical main theme on strings, derived from the main theme of the scherzo (which was the reversed version of the opening noble theme). It is unfolded in a contemplative manner, lacking any dramatic or yearning outburst. Several other ideas and motives are introduced, which impulse a flowing and seamless development. Violins introduce a second melodic theme, which hardly brings contrast but compliments the main one as it romantically unfolds and reaches an expressive climax. The main theme is recapitulated in the central part, followed by the series of motives. In the extensive coda, a new lyrical theme is introduced by strings, recalling the famous Nimrod variation from the Enigma Variations. It is actually, once again, a cunning reworking of the first movement’s opening theme. The movement ends with great serenity.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Whitby - The Abbey of St Hilda (1913) by the English painter Albert Goodwin.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/28xoyhd9 and https://tinyurl.com/2cyrmmpr
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/24qrarmk Symphony No.1 in A-flat major - Edward Elgar](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6zo_rUjAQhg/mqdefault.jpg)


![Symphony No.2 in D minor - Sergei Prokofiev
Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi.
I - Allegro ben articolato - Poco meno mosso - Meno mosso - Tempo primo - Poco meno mosso - Poco più mosso. Tempestoso - Poco meno mosso: 0:00
II - Theme and variations: Tema. Andante (11:47) - Variation I. Listesso tempo (13:24) - Variation II. Allegro non troppo (15:21) - Variation III. Allegro (17:59) - Variation IV. Larghetto (20:00) - Variation V. Allegro con brio (23:52) - Variation VI. Allegro moderato (26:32) - Più mosso - Più mosso. Con precipitazione - Assai meno mosso - Tema. Andante molto, doppio movimento (31:05)
Prokofievs Symphony No.2 was composed between 1924-5, written as a response to the prevailing modernist musical trends in Paris; style mécanique, unbridled dissonance and extreme complexity. The composer was no longer considered the daring avant-garde as in pre-war Europe, so he feared his music was becoming old-fashioned, but the symphony failed to achieve its purpose. It was premiered in Paris on June 6 of 1925, conducted by Serge Koussevitzky (to whom the score is dedicated) as part of his Paris series of concerts. The piece had an ambivalent reception, failing to gain the success the composer expected.
The symphony went on to be performed in the Soviet Union on June 6 of 1928 in Leningrad, and on 30 November 30 of 1934 in Moscow, conducted on both occasions by Alexander Gauk. In a letter to his friend Myaskovsky, Prokofiev admitted to not fully understanding the work himself, as well as having doubts about his ability as a composer for the first time in his life. The work, unlike the popular classical symphony, never secured a comfortable foothold in the orchestral repertoire, being only sporadically performed and recorded. In 1953, Prokofiev projected a substantial revision of the work, planning to transform the piece into a three-movement symphony. Unfortunately this came to nothing with his death on March 5 of that year.
Technology and machines, the idols of the new age, pressurized into music. Thus, the symphony is a typical child of its time: as far as content is concerned closely linked to the prevalent uncritical faith in machinery, radical progressive thinking, and almost naive enthusiasm for technology. Prokofiev may have been inspired or influenced by Honeggers Pacific 231, the orchestral work about the locomotive whose premiere Prokofiev attended on May 8 of 1924. Prokofiev characterized this symphony as a work of iron and steel, formally modelled after Beethovens Piano Sonata No.32. Much later on, contemporary composer Christopher Rouse called it the best of all of them, and wrote his own Symphony No. 3 (2011) in homage to the piece.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with fierce trumpet fanfares, which leads to a forceful and violent first theme on full orchestra, constructed over several repeating rhythmic motives (ostinati). The music is characterized by the abundance not only of ostinati, but also textural thickness, polytonal dissonance and near-constant forward momentum. The music reaches a brief but intense climax, followed by a syncopated transition dominated by strings, piano and woods. Then a harsh and menacing second theme is introduced in form of a dissonant polytonal chorale, introduced by brass over wood ostinati figures, leading to an agitated and nightmarish second climax.
This musical onslaught to the ears is briefly stopped at the beginning of the development, with double basses and low brass with martial ostinati that are the root of the material. These are contrapuntally developed as more instruments are added, up to seven different voices as we reach a riotous and acid climax. The material is then vigorously recapitulated, growing into another nightmarish climax with the second theme. Both then are put in counterpoint in the opening of the frantic and dissonant coda, before ending with a sequence of baleful D minor brass chords, with no real sense of triumph or victory.
The second movement is written as a theme and variations. It opens with undulating strings, over which a melancholic and lyrical main theme is presented by the oboe. The first variation is in the same tempo and continues this subdued mood, with the outlines of the theme often obscured by the addition of ostinato figures on woodwind and strings. The second variation is more rhythmic and animated, with ricocheting gestures on woodwind and strings. The music build to a grotesque and dissonant climax, before returning to the previous section. The third variation is a scherzo whose aggressive exchanges between the sections of the orchestra frequently conceal the themes steady unfolding in the depths.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section]
Picture: Two Heads (1925) by the Russian artist Pavel Filonov.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/24edo8pb
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2xvky22b Symphony No.2 in D minor - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8MaC62Lc71s/mqdefault.jpg)




