Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 92): 0:00
II - Adagio (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 69): 9:57
III - Scherzo. Allegro vivace (𝅗𝅥 = 84): 17:21
IV - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 132) - Un poco meno mosso - Tempo I - Un poco meno mosso - Tempo I - Poco meo - Più mosso: 22:21
Lachner's String Quartet No.2 was composed in 1843, being published in 1844. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a joyful and melodic main theme in A major, presented by the whole quartet. A more rhythmic but elegant second theme in E major is then introduced by the first violin, very classical in style. The influence of Schubert is clearly perceptible in the shape of the themes. The exposition is then repeated, also an element commonly found in classical works. The ensuing development is heavily contrapuntal in nature, also employing sudden modulations, dynamic contrast and rhythmic variance to transform the material. The main themes are then recapitulated, before a rushing and vigorous coda ends the allegro with a virtuosic flourish.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with a broadly lyrical and cantabile main theme in D major, presented by violins and cello. It unfolds in an expressive and intimate manner, reaching a dramatic central climax of great passion. A melancholic transition then leads to the recapitulation of the main theme with more subdued dynamics. The adagio ends with a pianissisimo coda with the main theme fading away.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a rhythmic and animated main theme in A major, chromatic in nature and presented by the whole quartet. Two parts of it a repeated in a classical fashion. The trio section features a lyrical and cantabile theme in A major on viola, also divided in two halves that are repeated. The scherzo material is then repeated da capo, ending with a vigorous gesture.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It opens with a rhythmic and march-like main theme in A major, which soon undergoes substantial harmonic and dynamic variations. It also exhibits a rolling motion of the sort Schubert employed in his last quartet, D.887. The second theme in E major is cantabile and lyrical in nature, presented by the whole quartet. A virtuosic transition leads to the development of the material, culminating in a grand climax of great virtuosity. The themes are then recapitulated, ending the quartet with a vigorous and resolute coda in A major.
Picture: "Fjord landscape" (1855) by the German painter Eduard Hildebrandt.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2y3z6n7h
To check the score: tinyurl.com/2bttfnwx
Performed by the Rodin Quartett.
I - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 92): 0:00
II - Adagio (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 69): 9:57
III - Scherzo. Allegro vivace (𝅗𝅥 = 84): 17:21
IV - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 132) - Un poco meno mosso - Tempo I - Un poco meno mosso - Tempo I - Poco meo - Più mosso: 22:21
Lachner's String Quartet No.2 was composed in 1843, being published in 1844. Unfortunately we don't know when and by whom it was premiered. Although largely forgotten nowadays, Lachner was a key composer in the transition between the late classical and romantic styles. He was a close friend of Franz Schubert, which became the greatest influence in Lachner's style. This results in a mixture of elements from the Viennese classical school with the romantic expression of Beethoven.
Lachner's cycle of seven string quartets (one unpublished and unrecorded) is a perfect example of this. They were much admired and often performed during his lifetime. Mendelssohn was fascinated by them and Schumann called Lachner the most talented composer in southern Germany. Writing twenty years later, Tchaikovsky noted that Lachner had to be placed near the pinnacle of fine composers. These quartets are sure to be appealing to both amateur and professional musicians, and would certainly be enjoyed by general audiences and connoisseurs alike.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a joyful and melodic main theme in A major, presented by the whole quartet. A more rhythmic but elegant second theme in E major is then introduced by the first violin, very classical in style. The influence of Schubert is clearly perceptible in the shape of the themes. The exposition is then repeated, also an element commonly found in classical works. The ensuing development is heavily contrapuntal in nature, also employing sudden modulations, dynamic contrast and rhythmic variance to transform the material. The main themes are then recapitulated, before a rushing and vigorous coda ends the allegro with a virtuosic flourish.
The second movement is written in form of an arch. It opens with a broadly lyrical and cantabile main theme in D major, presented by violins and cello. It unfolds in an expressive and intimate manner, reaching a dramatic central climax of great passion. A melancholic transition then leads to the recapitulation of the main theme with more subdued dynamics. The adagio ends with a pianissisimo coda with the main theme fading away.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a rhythmic and animated main theme in A major, chromatic in nature and presented by the whole quartet. Two parts of it a repeated in a classical fashion. The trio section features a lyrical and cantabile theme in A major on viola, also divided in two halves that are repeated. The scherzo material is then repeated da capo, ending with a vigorous gesture.
The fourth movement is structured in sonata form. It opens with a rhythmic and march-like main theme in A major, which soon undergoes substantial harmonic and dynamic variations. It also exhibits a rolling motion of the sort Schubert employed in his last quartet, D.887. The second theme in E major is cantabile and lyrical in nature, presented by the whole quartet. A virtuosic transition leads to the development of the material, culminating in a grand climax of great virtuosity. The themes are then recapitulated, ending the quartet with a vigorous and resolute coda in A major.
Picture: "Fjord landscape" (1855) by the German painter Eduard Hildebrandt.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/2y3z6n7h
To check the score: tinyurl.com/2bttfnwx







![Symphony No.2 in D - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Lento rubato - (attacca): 0:00
II - Scherzo. Vivace assai: 9:52
III - Adagio tranquillo: 15:40
IV - Rondo. Allegretto amabile - Coda. Presto: 25:47
Rubbras Symphony No.2 was composed between February and November 1937, immediately after the first one. It was premiered in a radio broadcast on December 16 of 1938, conducted by Sir Adrian Boult (to whom the score is dedicated), who would conduct it multiple times aftwerwards. No.2 is the second of four closely related symphonies Rubbra wrote in quick succession between 1935-41. He described them as being different facets of one thought, since each was a reaction to the last. The Symphony also reflects the agitated and turbulent times of Britain in the 1930s, also portrayed in William Waltons Symphony No.1 in B-flat minor, Vaughan Williams Symphony No.4 in F minor or Alan Bush Symphony No.1 in C.
Rubbra substantially revised the work between 1945-6, reducing the requirement for triple woodwind down to double. He also made cuts to the first movement and revised the ending to finish in D major, somewhat clarifying the symphonys ambiguous tonality: the original version began in D minor and ended in E-flat major. The revised version was first performed at the Cheltenham Festival in 1946, with the composer conducting the London Philharmonic Orchestra. It seems it was revised again in 1950. When Boult was a guest on the BBCs classical music program Desert Island Discs, in his choice of just ten recordings to take if he were to be exiled to a desert island for life, Boult chose this symphony as one of his ten
Rubbra himself described the work with the following words: My 2nd essay in symphonic form was directed… to discover how far the interplay of melodic lines could be made to realize the dramatic tension necessary in such a work: how far melodic lines and units, without the adventitious aid of pattern and colour, could carry the weight of a large symphonic movement. Robert Simpson praised the symphony on 1978: has all the deep thoughtfulness and lack of surface brilliance typical of this composer, the most substantial of whose works will withstand long familiarity and deep examination. No-one who takes music seriously should fail to get to know this work thoroughly.
The first movement begins with an expressive descending scale on strings, followed by an ascending one on woodwinds. These are the basic elements that construct the (mostly) D minor lento, Rubbra expertly creating long-range tension in relation to the home tonality. A dramatic main theme is contrapuntally unfolded, culminating in an agitated and passionate climax. Follows a calmer section introduced by a flute solo, but a long crescendo leads to a powerful second climax, showing a rather unique combination of expression and architecture. A rhythmic motive, previously introduced in the end of the first climax, lead to the movements final peak, the most dissonant and dramatic in tone. The oboe poignantly recapitulates the opening descending scale before leading to the next part.
The second movement is a very free scherzo. It opens with a rhythmic main theme that shows the influence of Holst, the most notable of Rubbras teachers. A lyrical second theme is introduced by strings and put in counterpoint with the main one. As with the first symphony, all of this material is largely derived from the opening, and in some ways the scherzo can be regarded as a development of the previous lento rubato. The music constantly changes of time signatures (9/8 and 15/8) alla Stravinsky, while harmonically the music struggles between C major and C-sharp minor. There is no contrasting trio section, but a brief slower bridge before the scherzo continues its contrapuntal vigour and energy. A muscular polytonal coda ends the vivace assai.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Landscape with archaeological remains set design for Giuseppe Mulè Opera Taormina (1937) by Italian Scenographer Carlo Santocito.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/27wuox8z, https://tinyurl.com/27z4lllr, https://tinyurl.com/25m9ve9t and https://tinyurl.com/2cw34m77
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.2 in D - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BLUdN7j476E/mqdefault.jpg)


