Panel. The non-proliferation paradox: is the treaty system keeping up? @WithTheEconomist
Panel. The non-proliferation paradox: is the treaty system keeping up?  @WithTheEconomist
Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
Supported by Lightbridge

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons in an earlier era. SMRs, advanced fuels and isotope production have both civil and military uses. Could non-proliferation be achieved through reactor or fuel design? Are today’s nuclear safeguards robust enough, or is the world entering an age of ambiguity that treaties can’t contain?

Moderator: Katherine Stewart, head of impact research, policy and insights, Economist Impact
Seth Grae, chief executive, Lightbridge
Scott Roecker, vice-president, nuclear materials security, Nuclear Threat Initiative
Gaukhar Mukhatzhanova, director, Vienna Centre for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation
Panel. The non-proliferation paradox: is the treaty system keeping up?Panel. Conviction or caution? Investing in net zero‘Here comes the Sun’ piano poetry live performanceFireside chat: The AI cat is out of the bag: can the grid keep up?Case study. Creating personalised customer journeys with agentic AI in a (human) travel businessTHE SUSTAINABLE FASHION SHOWPanel. Medical R&D in microgravity: the business casePanel. When to invest, pause or pull the plug?Fireside chat. Can growth be maintained when the AI novelty wears off?Panel. Future-proof or flawed? Bridging the gap between Gen Z passion and commercial capabilityPanel. Gene editing in agriculture: implications for farming and foodPanel. Building resilience into procurement decisions: how to educate your workforce
Economist Enterprise – Events |

Panel. The non-proliferation paradox: is the treaty system keeping up?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER