NetZero in 2050 is onhaalbaar en onbetaalbaar @clintelfoundation

Uploaded March 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

In deze korte clip uit het interview van Clintel directeur Marcel Crok bij Brainwave legt hij uit dat NetZero in 2050 onhaalbaar en onbetaalbaar is. Hij legt ook uit waarom dit niet wordt gecommuniceerd en waarom niemand van het KNMI of zelfs XR hierover met hem in gesprek wil.

Bekijk het hele interview hier: youtu.be/9tK12i-SaOE

Of beluister het op Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/4BwNRae64LQGzjg2eHOphK?si=2c43b50b91464335

Schrijf je in op onze nieuwsbrief: https://eds6.mailcamp.nl/subscribeform.php?form=126&token=12080cbbeb0a329a65d12a3195b260c21731508366

Volg ons op social media:

Clintel international clintel.org
Clintel Nederland https://clintel.nl/
Clintel store clintelwebshop.org
X https://x.com/ClintelOrg
X https://x.com/ClintelNED
LinkedIn linkedin.com/company/clintel-foundation
Facebook facebook.com/Clintel-384028188858886
Instagram instagram.com/clintel_nl
Tiktok tiktok.com/@clintel_nl

NetZero in 2050 is onhaalbaar en onbetaalbaar

De Toekomst van Nederland - Aflevering 1

De Noordpool ijsvrij? De deadline schuift steeds op

There is no existential (climate) threat

Peer review bewijst niet dat een studie klopt

Lezing Marcel Crok 18 juni 2024: Zal het klimaatdebat in de rechtszaal beslecht worden?

The Climate Emergency Illusionists and the Pact for the Future by Jacob Nordangård 18 June 2024

CO₂ Residence Time: Why Human Emissions Drive the Rise | Ferdinand Engelbeen

CO₂ myth debunked by Professor Richard Lindzen

Sobre el clima: la película (locución en español)

$Fundamental Ideas in Climate Research: How Correct Are They? | Demetris Koutsoyiannis In this presentation, hydrologist Demetris Koutsoyiannis critically examines the foundations of modern climate research and asks whether some of its central assumptions are supported by observational data. Koutsoyiannis traces influential ideas associated with Svante Arrhenius, Guy Stewart Callendar and Charles David Keeling. He argues that the enormous role of the biosphere in the global carbon cycle has historically been underestimated, while disproportionate attention has been given to human CO₂ emissions. Drawing on his published research, he discusses: • the natural and human components of the carbon cycle; • the atmospheric CO₂ “hockey stick”; • carbon isotopes and the Suess effect; • the concept of the airborne fraction; • atmospheric residence time and carbon mass balance; • the reduction in human emissions during the COVID-19 period; • causality between atmospheric temperature and CO₂; • the respective roles of water vapour, clouds and CO₂ in the greenhouse effect. Koutsoyiannis presents a data-based and highly critical interpretation. He argues that temperature changes precede changes in atmospheric CO₂ across multiple timescales, that natural carbon flows deserve much greater attention and that observations do not support the importance commonly attributed to CO₂ in the greenhouse effect. The presentation is followed by an extensive question-and-answer session in which participants challenge and discuss his modelling assumptions, the distinction between natural and anthropogenic effects, regional processes and the implications for climate policy. This lecture was recorded during the Clintel Workshop on Recent Research Developments on Atmospheric Temperature, Carbon Dioxide and Their Relationship, held at the National Technical University of Athens on 19 September 2024. Learn more about Clintel and the World Climate Declaration: https://clintel.org/ Hoofdstukken 00:00 Introduction 00:41 Opening remarks 01:26 The importance of the biosphere 02:58 Inspecting the foundations of climate research 04:22 Research into temperature and CO₂ 06:51 Arrhenius and the origins of climate theory 08:25 Callendar’s contribution 09:17 Keeling and atmospheric CO₂ measurements 10:44 Carbon isotopes and the Keeling plot 12:23 The airborne fraction 13:49 The biosphere in the IPCC carbon balance 15:35 Carbon isotopes and the Suess effect 18:14 Modelling the atmospheric carbon cycle 22:37 Responding to criticisms of the model 26:25 Are natural processes always a net sink? 28:43 Temperature–CO₂ causality 30:07 The COVID-19 emissions experiment 33:36 Does CO₂ follow temperature? 35:59 The importance of CO₂ in the greenhouse effect 38:41 Conclusions 40:35 Questions and discussion$

Clintel |

NetZero in 2050 is onhaalbaar en onbetaalbaar