Mirage Zone Magic @bobshafto

Bobby Shafto | Mirage Zone Magic @bobshafto | Uploaded February 2024 | Updated October 2024, 3 hours ago.
I've asked this question many times on this channel. I have not received a satisfactory answer, and yet I continue to read and hear that inferior mirage is what is creating the illusion of surface curvature.

Ignoring the issue of increasing angular drop of targets with distance for now, how could an inferior mirage that is obscuring a narrow vertical band of an image be responsible for a vertical span of missing visual information that has a greater angular value than that of the mirage itself?

Inviting constructive comments below...again.

Arcadia - Wonders by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1100326
Artist: incompetech.com

Are You Qualified to Discuss Trig? (see description)

Saw this online. It was unattributed. Unusual sunset.

San Diego Harbor Entrance: Buoy Alignment

$Comparing Flat and Globe Models to Reality I manually modeled the Provence Cross to Canigou observation for both a globe earth and a flat earth to compare with the actual images. Ive be asking flat earthers in the comments section of previous videos for specifics regarding location of eye-level, angles, distances if we assume the earth is flat and have not been able to extract any specific, quantified values. So Ive done it myself and am presenting it in this video. Ive used Walter Bislins application to help visualize the origination of mountain summit, distance shoreline, horizon and near coastline smokestacks. See http://walter.bislins.ch/CurveCalc He has both globe earth and flat earth models. This comparison intentionally holds off on applying refraction or other optical factors than may alter the model. This is strictly a basic foundation applying only geometry and the principles of perspective. Its a starting point from which any optical or atmospheric adjustments can be made. But youll see that the flat earth model has a larger gap to adjust for than does the globe earth model. The globe earth model need just apply a standard atmospheric refraction adjustment and it matches the observed image capture closely. While there is a litany of claims for adjusting the flat earth model based on optical considerations, no method or technique has yet been offered. Perhaps this presentation will encourage that effort. Imagery; Canigou by Bruno Carrias https://www.flickr.com/photos/76574511@N02/ https://www.instagram.com/brunocarrias/?hl=en Sounds: Krishnas Callipo by Jesse Gallagher$