Uploaded February 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Needless to say I wasn’t really planning on spending another week (and 12+ hour render) on #Juno #Blizzardof2015, but I’m obviously trying to make a point. Two weeks ago the entire Meteorological Community was uniformly incorrect in their forecast of 3ft. of snow in New York City, and it offered the best opportunity to prove the reality of geoengineering integration in meteorological forecasting, that I’ve had in some time. As always I welcome and encourage any “Real Meteorologist” on the planet to challenge any of this reality… bring your real name and reputation with you, if you intend to.
However, I’d say “you’d be surprised at the amount of total silence I get from the meteorological, geoengineering, climate change communities,” but seriously – what kind of “surprise” is it? I wouldn’t challenge me on any of this reality either. Especially if I was someone who actually has some ‘understanding’ about what is going on on this planet.
As I say frequently – there isn’t any point to it. There isn’t an argument to be won here. I’m not operating from any kind of ‘agenda’ that can be ‘destabilized’ or ‘derailed’ or ‘diluted’ with nonsense. There isn’t any ‘gotcha’ scenario that is going to undo the 100 years of reality I’m presenting here.
What I am presenting, are simply the logical conclusions drawn from daily observable reality and scientific fact. The first rule in proving any hypothesis is being able to repeat it, and as everyone around here knows – I can and do repeatedly prove my hypotheses in every single video I produce… which is somewhere in the 150+ range now.
This of course, is why I don’t hear from any meteorologists… ever. I assure you, it’s not because they don’t “know of my work.” I’ve sent my work to all of them enough times, and the meteorological community is most certainly aware. In fact, I’ll be sending this video to several of them as well, as I do with every video I produce.
What is a meteorologist supposed to argue with me about? Whether or not water is wet? Whether or not water condenses to form rain? Whether or not Power Plant Water Vapor, is Water Vapor or not? Is a meteorologist supposed to argue with me about frequency manipulation? Heterodyning frequency? Fair warning to any “meteorologist” who would want to argue with me – about engineering: I’m not reverse-engineering anything that was engineered in the first place. All of the processes I describe, I can also produce the patents for to back it up.
Like I said… there isn’t any argument to be won here. But that doesn’t mean meteorologist should avoid me like the plague either.
(Full message in Video Post Comment)
WW101
weatherwar101.com
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
Please support this continuing independent work.
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
---
Psyop Disinformation, Obstruction, and Terrorism ow.ly/uxzHH
No Natural Weather: eBook Obstruction and Disinformation ow.ly/xPHEK
Introduction to Geoengineering 101 ow.ly/utaM4
The Big Picture 2.0 ow.ly/uxzEE
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Needless to say I wasn’t really planning on spending another week (and 12+ hour render) on #Juno #Blizzardof2015, but I’m obviously trying to make a point. Two weeks ago the entire Meteorological Community was uniformly incorrect in their forecast of 3ft. of snow in New York City, and it offered the best opportunity to prove the reality of geoengineering integration in meteorological forecasting, that I’ve had in some time. As always I welcome and encourage any “Real Meteorologist” on the planet to challenge any of this reality… bring your real name and reputation with you, if you intend to.
However, I’d say “you’d be surprised at the amount of total silence I get from the meteorological, geoengineering, climate change communities,” but seriously – what kind of “surprise” is it? I wouldn’t challenge me on any of this reality either. Especially if I was someone who actually has some ‘understanding’ about what is going on on this planet.
As I say frequently – there isn’t any point to it. There isn’t an argument to be won here. I’m not operating from any kind of ‘agenda’ that can be ‘destabilized’ or ‘derailed’ or ‘diluted’ with nonsense. There isn’t any ‘gotcha’ scenario that is going to undo the 100 years of reality I’m presenting here.
What I am presenting, are simply the logical conclusions drawn from daily observable reality and scientific fact. The first rule in proving any hypothesis is being able to repeat it, and as everyone around here knows – I can and do repeatedly prove my hypotheses in every single video I produce… which is somewhere in the 150+ range now.
This of course, is why I don’t hear from any meteorologists… ever. I assure you, it’s not because they don’t “know of my work.” I’ve sent my work to all of them enough times, and the meteorological community is most certainly aware. In fact, I’ll be sending this video to several of them as well, as I do with every video I produce.
What is a meteorologist supposed to argue with me about? Whether or not water is wet? Whether or not water condenses to form rain? Whether or not Power Plant Water Vapor, is Water Vapor or not? Is a meteorologist supposed to argue with me about frequency manipulation? Heterodyning frequency? Fair warning to any “meteorologist” who would want to argue with me – about engineering: I’m not reverse-engineering anything that was engineered in the first place. All of the processes I describe, I can also produce the patents for to back it up.
Like I said… there isn’t any argument to be won here. But that doesn’t mean meteorologist should avoid me like the plague either.
(Full message in Video Post Comment)
WW101
weatherwar101.com
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
Please support this continuing independent work.
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
---
Psyop Disinformation, Obstruction, and Terrorism ow.ly/uxzHH
No Natural Weather: eBook Obstruction and Disinformation ow.ly/xPHEK
Introduction to Geoengineering 101 ow.ly/utaM4
The Big Picture 2.0 ow.ly/uxzEE
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
