Uploaded May 2019 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The usual modus operandi - go on Google, pick a photo fit for lying purposes, crop it to within an inch of its life, put it in a video, say it's been sent to you by a subscriber, say it's recent, talk shit about it. Seems to me it is a compulsion that needs medical assistance.
CREDITS:
contrailscience.com
t.cj.sina.com
Tara Leeluu Hauki @ picsart.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Liar" by KoRn
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
The usual modus operandi - go on Google, pick a photo fit for lying purposes, crop it to within an inch of its life, put it in a video, say it's been sent to you by a subscriber, say it's recent, talk shit about it. Seems to me it is a compulsion that needs medical assistance.
CREDITS:
contrailscience.com
t.cj.sina.com
Tara Leeluu Hauki @ picsart.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Liar" by KoRn
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
