Uploaded November 2018 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Matt Rogers failing to reveal the true source of a photograph or what it actually is, YET AGAIN. Misinformation and bullshit seem to come soooooooooooooooooooo easily to him.
CREDITS:
Link to Earthsky article - earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-the-brightest-planet-venus-in-a-blue-daytime-sky
NASA
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Venus" by Frankie Avalon
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting, & research & is done
in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably
copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said
works was used , this was NOT a verbatum copy of the work &
has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all
samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder
allthough its content is "associated" with a specific person's work
it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm
the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Matt Rogers failing to reveal the true source of a photograph or what it actually is, YET AGAIN. Misinformation and bullshit seem to come soooooooooooooooooooo easily to him.
CREDITS:
Link to Earthsky article - earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-the-brightest-planet-venus-in-a-blue-daytime-sky
NASA
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Venus" by Frankie Avalon
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting, & research & is done
in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably
copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said
works was used , this was NOT a verbatum copy of the work &
has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all
samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder
allthough its content is "associated" with a specific person's work
it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm
the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
