Uploaded March 2018 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Second part of the weekly series that details the types of clouds we see in the sky. This week, the fair weather cauliflower shaped clouds called cumulus.
Be assured, no mentions of chemtrails or invading planetary systems - because they don't exist!
CREDITS:
Pixabay
Max Pixel
coclouds.com
publicdomainpictures.net
pexels
pxhere
The Met Office
patternpictures.com
Janne Naukkarinen
sciencing.com
Toby Hudson
Bidgee via Wikimedia Commons
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Big White Cloud" by John Cale
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Second part of the weekly series that details the types of clouds we see in the sky. This week, the fair weather cauliflower shaped clouds called cumulus.
Be assured, no mentions of chemtrails or invading planetary systems - because they don't exist!
CREDITS:
Pixabay
Max Pixel
coclouds.com
publicdomainpictures.net
pexels
pxhere
The Met Office
patternpictures.com
Janne Naukkarinen
sciencing.com
Toby Hudson
Bidgee via Wikimedia Commons
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Big White Cloud" by John Cale
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
