Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Three Synchronisms, for instruments and electronic sounds (1963-65)
No. 1 for Flute (1963) - Harvey Sollberger, flute
No. 2 for Flute, Clarinet, Violin, Cello (1964) - Sophie Sollberger, flute; Stanley Drucker, clarinet; Paul Zukofsky, violin; Robert L. Martin, cello; Efrain Guigut, conductor [4:21]
No. 3 for Cello (1964-65) - Robert L. Martin, cello [10:21]
Concerning the Three Synchronisms recorded here, Mr. Davidovsky notes that ‘‘They belong to a series of short pieces wherein conventional instruments are used in conjunction with electronic sounds. The attempt here has been made to preserve the typical characteristics of the conventional instruments and of the electronic medium respectively — yet to achieve integration of both into a coherent musical texture.”
“In the planning and realization of these pieces,” Mr. Davidovsky notes further, “two main problems arise — namely proper synchronization (a) of rhythm and (b) of pitch. During the shorter episodes where both electronic and conventional instruments are playing, rather strict timing is adhered to. However, in the more extended episodes of this type, an element of chance is introduced to allow for the inevitable time discrepancies that develop between the live performer(s) and the constant-speed tape recorder.
“To achieve pitch coherence between the conventional instruments which use the 12-tone chromatic scale and the electronic medium which is non-tempered, use is made of tonal occurrences of very high density — manifested for example by a very high speed succession of attacks, possible only in the electronic medium. Thus, in such instances — based on high speed and short duration of separate tones, it is impossible for the ear to perceive the pure pitch value of each separate event; though in reacting, it does trace so to speak a statistical curve of the density. Only in a very few instances have tempered electronic pitches been employed in the Synchronisms. Throughout all three pieces, the tape recorder has been used as an integral part of the instrumental fabric.” [CRI204 Stereo]
Art by Jarmo Mäkilä
Three Synchronisms, for instruments and electronic sounds (1963-65)
No. 1 for Flute (1963) - Harvey Sollberger, flute
No. 2 for Flute, Clarinet, Violin, Cello (1964) - Sophie Sollberger, flute; Stanley Drucker, clarinet; Paul Zukofsky, violin; Robert L. Martin, cello; Efrain Guigut, conductor [4:21]
No. 3 for Cello (1964-65) - Robert L. Martin, cello [10:21]
Concerning the Three Synchronisms recorded here, Mr. Davidovsky notes that ‘‘They belong to a series of short pieces wherein conventional instruments are used in conjunction with electronic sounds. The attempt here has been made to preserve the typical characteristics of the conventional instruments and of the electronic medium respectively — yet to achieve integration of both into a coherent musical texture.”
“In the planning and realization of these pieces,” Mr. Davidovsky notes further, “two main problems arise — namely proper synchronization (a) of rhythm and (b) of pitch. During the shorter episodes where both electronic and conventional instruments are playing, rather strict timing is adhered to. However, in the more extended episodes of this type, an element of chance is introduced to allow for the inevitable time discrepancies that develop between the live performer(s) and the constant-speed tape recorder.
“To achieve pitch coherence between the conventional instruments which use the 12-tone chromatic scale and the electronic medium which is non-tempered, use is made of tonal occurrences of very high density — manifested for example by a very high speed succession of attacks, possible only in the electronic medium. Thus, in such instances — based on high speed and short duration of separate tones, it is impossible for the ear to perceive the pure pitch value of each separate event; though in reacting, it does trace so to speak a statistical curve of the density. Only in a very few instances have tempered electronic pitches been employed in the Synchronisms. Throughout all three pieces, the tape recorder has been used as an integral part of the instrumental fabric.” [CRI204 Stereo]
Art by Jarmo Mäkilä
![Wolfgang Rihm - In-Schrift
In-Schrift, for orchestra (1995)
Bamberger Symphoniker
Hans Zender
All spatiality should be circumscribed in the music. I attempted to outwit the resonance with a consistent harmonic system; the voices move for the most part within a firmly contoured framework of chords, so that even rapid music is possible without blurring.
The basic idea is succinct: an Inschrift [“inscription” or “epigraph”]. This occurs in writing [in Schrift], both musical and writing notational characters, written into the line like adages. The orchestration is darkened, thereby attaining focus. Wolfgang Rihm
Art by Pierre Bonnard Wolfgang Rihm - In-Schrift](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/u7Im3Ked-9Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![Harrison Birtwistle - Three Settings of Celan
Three Settings of Celan, for soprano, 2 clarinets, viola, violoncello and double bass (1989)
Christine Whittlesey, sopran
Ensemble InterContemporain
Pierre Boulez
At the close of the last century, the poetry of Romanian-born Holocaust survivor Paul Celan (1920-1970) drew the interest of many composers. In the 1990s Luciano Berio, György Kurtág, John Zorn, and Peter Ruzicka composed works on the poet, the latter producing a full-length opera. It was a culmination of Celan’s lifelong association with musical imagery beginning with his famous early poem Todesfuge (Death Fugue).
In 1989 Harrison Birtwistle set “White and Light” in response to a commission from England’s Composers Ensemble. Over the next several years he would return to Celan for inspiration to fulfill both vocal and instrumental commissions. In 1996 he combined nine poems and nine movements for string quartet into an hour-long work titled Pulse Shadows. From that he excerpted a smaller collection: Three Settings of Celan.
“White and Light,” “Night,” and “Tenebrae” are poems from late in Celan’s life, when he had moved away from a traditional lyricism to a more compressed and austere style. Utilizing English translations by Michael Hamburger Birtwistle’s score offers versions in both English and the original German.
“Pulse Shadows” is an apt image to describe the music. In “White and Light” there is a shadow play between the soprano and clarinet, which closely echo and anticipate each other’s melodic lines. The tempo and texture is unsteady and fluid, a quality reflected in Celan’s text by repeated use of the word “drift.” The soprano’s highest register is on full display in “Night,” while aggressive viola strokes provide an uneasy pulsation to “Tenebrae.” Long, sustained soprano notes – particularly on the many instances of the word “Lord” – lead the work to an enigmatic conclusion. [laphil.com]
Art by Anselm Kiefer Harrison Birtwistle - Three Settings of Celan](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uKVb_rG7iCs/mqdefault.jpg)

![Luc Ferrari - Danses organiques
Danses organiques, cinema pour loreille (1971-1973)
Luc Ferrari is one of the most important and intriguing figures of the last forty years, a pioneer of musique concrète at the beginning of the Groupe de Recherche Musicales in Paris, and perhaps the only real artist among many excellent researchers as someone suggested. With a very peculiar sensibility he creates his own musical world in which wit, sensuality, extreme sound realism, playful analytical abilities, social concerns, and love for good food are important and inspiring elements. No matter how radical his musical intuitions and concepts may be or have been, his music has always had a provoking but charming quality.
Danses organiques, presented here in its original 50 minutes version (an abridged 45-minute version also exists), could be a strange meeting between two girls and a tape recorder and is one of his most unorthodox, lively and sensually charged pieces, recorded between 1971 and 1973 in a period when he was leaving the official studios to build his own independently. It was completely recorded on my small machines: I recorded the single tracks separately and then superimposed them to create an organic whole.
The composer lends his tape recorder to two girls who are to meet and to start a relation and then builds his imaginary folklore music around their confidential dialogue, sighs and moans, with the addition of his deep observations on organic music. The resulting music has a groovy rhythmic quality in its surreal synthetic development and is outstandingly modern with its similarities to some unacademical artisanal music made today with electroacoustic means. [soundohm.com]
Art by Diego Rivera Luc Ferrari - Danses organiques](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v28CD9Brd5Q/mqdefault.jpg)

![Claude Schryer - Sound Letter II
Sound Letter II, 49 electroacoustic soundscape meditations for random (shuffle) mode playback (1998)
Au Dernier Vivan† Les Biens
1. Accord
2. Appel
3. Arrivée
4. Ascension
5. Blessure
6. Bocal (Sounds – Robert Normandeau)
7. Brassage
8. Capital
9. Caresse
10. Cassini
11. Centre (Sounds – Kamthye Chow)
12. Circulation (Sounds – Kamthye Chow)
13. Collision
14. Courbe
15. Cycles
16. Délicat
17. Douleur
18. Éclat
19. Écoute (Sounds – Peter Huse)
20. Effort
21. Équilibre (Sounds – Hildegard Westerkamp)
22. Espoir
23. Éternal
24 .Fragilité
25. Gratte
26. Guérison (Sounds – Membres Du Wolf Project)
27. Guerre (Sounds – R. Murray Schafer)
28. Innocence
29. Liquide
30. Matin (Sounds – Annette Vande Gorne)
31. Mort
32. Nœuds (Sounds – Kamthye Chow)
33. Nuage
34. Parle (Sounds – Blanche Baillargeon, Jeannine Schryer, Luc Courchesne, Sophie Marchand)
35. Pas
36. Plaisir
37. Porte
38. Pousse (Sounds – Kamthye Chow)
39. Poussière
40. Prairie
41. Profondeur (Recorded By [Brise-glace] – Monique Savoie)
42. Respect
43. Réveil
44. Rumeurs
45. Sagesse
46. Sang
47. Sensibilité
48. Seule
49. Temps
Sound Letter II is a collection of forty-nine electroacoustic soundscape mediations on spiritual themes. These meditations were conceived for ambient listening using the random or shuffle mode of your CD player. They are open to numerous listening and broadcast possibilities, including in four tracks (with two copies of the piece playing simultaneously) or as a concert performance with improvisations with and around the pieces.
Sound Letter II is a non-commercial, limited edition (1000 copies) which has been made available free of charge to subscribers of Musicworks magazine (issue #70) and to friends and colleagues along my path. Claude Schryer
Art by Wassily Kandinsky Claude Schryer - Sound Letter II](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vGLKc6XzF_4/mqdefault.jpg)

![Albert Roussel - Le festin de laraignee
Le festin de laraignee, ballet pantomime de Gilbert de Voisins (Ed. Durand et Cie) (1912)
I. Premiére partie: Prélude - Entrée des Fourmis - Entrée des Bousiers - Danse du Papillon - Danse de l’Araignée - Ronde des Fourmis - Combat des Mantes - Danse de l’Araignée - Eclosion et danse de l’Éphémère.
II. Deuxième partie: Danse de l’Éphémère et des vers de fruit - Mort de l’Éphémère - Agonie de l’Araignée - Funérailles de l’Éphémère. [22:34]
Orchestre National de LO.R.T.F.
Jean Martinon
The whole output of Albert Roussel demonstrates an unusual rhythmic gift, and his music, even in the “abstract’’ compositions written for the concert hall, conjures the dance. Thus it is only logical that the choreographic element should prevail in his stage works. He wrote three great Ballets: The Spider’s Feast, recorded here (1912), Bacchus et Ariane (1930) and Aeneas (1935), and in his single full-scale Opera, Padmävati (1914-18), dance intervenes so frequently that the score was called an “Opera-Ballet’’. In the “lyrical tale’’ The Birth of the Lyre the music’s center of gravity also lies in the ballet scenes.
Through the rhythmic element asserts itself with peculiar strength in Roussel’s late works, in his new classical style, the main products of his earlier, more impressionistic phase nevertheless boast a rhythmic invention of unusual wealth, The Spider’s Feast being a particularly convincing example. It is hard to believe that Roussel, a passionate nature-lover, who shortly before had written a First Symphony inspired by the Forest (Le Poéme de la Forét), should have accepted the commission of a Ballet about insect life with great reluctance, only starting work after his wife had urged him to do so. The commission came from the director of the Paris Théâtre des Arts, Jacques Rouché, who had just produced Ravel’s Ma Mère l’Oye as a ballet with great success. In September 1912, he brought Roussel a choreographic synopsis in one act by Count Gilbert de Voisins, inspired by the Souvenirs entomologiques of the great French scientist Henri Fabre. After the initial hesitations, the score was written down in less than three months, an unusually short time for the slow worker Roussel: by the end of the year it was completed. The limitations in scoring imposed by the fact that the ballet was to be staged in a small theatre had been no obstacle to the composer, since they corresponded to the very nature of the subject. Within Roussel’s output the piece thus holds the position of an intimate, lightweight interlude between the two great works inspired by his trips to India: the Evocations (1910-11) and the Opera Padmävati. Through its harscher, darker and bolder idiom, the latter opens a new phase, underlined by the composer himself, whereas The Spider’s Feast brings Roussel’s impressionistic period to a witty and beguiling conclusion.
To Roussel, the easily and quickly written ballet rather held the significance of a nice occasional piece, but success was to contradict this. The premiere took place on April 3rd, 1913 (a few weeks before Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring !), with Gabriel Grovlez conducting. The choreography was by Leo Staats, the decoration by Maxime Dethomas. Sahary Djeli danced the part of the Spider, Ariane Hugon the Butterfly, Dimitria the Dayfly, Tomy and Georgy Footit the Praying Mantises. There were twenty-two performances instead of the planned eight, and the modest score brought its author the long-expected world fame. The ballet was frequently staged and performances of the symphonic Suite were even more numerous. For several decades it overshadowed the composer’s later, often more significant productions, which understandably caused him some anger. Now that the great symphonies and late ballets have finally received their due, the musical world may enjoy the delightful early masterwork without any reservation.
Unfortunately, the orchestral suite contains less than half of the full score, whose most significant episodes it omits. A complete performance, as recorded here, is absolutely indispensable in order to appreciate the full wealth of Roussel’s inspiration. [EPR 15540]
Art by Jan Fabre Albert Roussel - Le festin de laraignee](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vKTrUa779vE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Victor Nubla - Quantos / Represalia
Quantos / Represalia (1982)
Quantos / Represalia fue grabado por Victor Nubla en los estudios Sonitec, en la calle Gomis número 42 de Barcelona, en una sola noche de octubre de 1982, usando como instrumento un magnetofón 3M de 16 pistas y un centenar de cintas de audio extraídas de los archivos del propio estudio. Fue editado en formato de cassette un mes después, en edición limitada de 21 ejemplares con la portada impresa en acetato. Después se reeditó formando parte de la primera edición de cassettes LMD, con el mítico embalaje de la carpetilla de gomas (que es el que se presenta en la imagen). Posteriormente, hubo dos reediciones más, una en 1984 y otra en 1986, ésta con portada de Xavier Manubens.
Esta pieza fue finalista en el Concurso de Música Electroacústica de Bourges en 1983.
Algunos fragmentos fueron usados por Marcelo Expósito en su video La Tierra de la Madre (1994).
Quantos / Represalia es el primer trabajo publicado en solitario por Nubla (con Macromassa llevaba ya desde 1976), a la vez que su primer trabajo de música concreta y su primer acercamiento al apropiacionismo, que fructificaría finalmente con el uso del sampler a partir de 1986 y la larga serie MCO.
Comienza a encontrarse aquí la exploración de planos, el uso espectral del sonido y del silencio, que será habitual posteriormente en el trabajo de Nubla en la serie MCO. Aquí Nubla no tenía todavía un sampler, pero tenía un gran estudio de grabación completo para él solo que, además, estaba lleno de grabaciones. Podríamos decir un sampler gigante. Faltaban cuatro años para que el primer SK1 llegase al estudio LMD.
Los créditos de las primeras ediciones solamente indicaban que estaba interpretado por el Octeto Cristóbal Colón dirigido por Agoom An.Huba, el nombre utilizado por Nubla en la primera etapa de Macromassa.
Grabado en los estudios Sonitec de Vallcarca, Barcelona. Instrumentación: magnetofón Scotch de 16 pistas, cintas magnéticas de 1 pulgada y 1/4 de pulgada. Reverberación de muelle de 6 m. en un bloque de cemento suspendido a 1,50 m. del suelo. [hronir.org]
Art by Calo Carratalá Victor Nubla - Quantos / Represalia](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w4YwyLDOapM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Walter Piston - Sonata for Flute & Piano
Sonata for Flute & Piano (1930)
I. Allegro moderato e con grazia
II. Adagio [5:38]
III. Allegro vivace [11:33]
Julius Baker, flute
Anthony Makas, piano
Walter Piston was one of the leading composers of the generation of American composers that came to prominence in the late 1920s and early 1930s. He was a little slower to develop than some others (such as the six-years-younger Copland), but it is with this work of 1930 that his presence began to be felt as an important voice on the American music scene.
Piston did not often stray from the sort of sonata exemplified in this early example: It is in three movements comprising a sonata form, an ABA slow movement, and a finale in sonata-rondo form. On the surface, it also seems that he adheres to the traditional tonic/ dominant-and-beyond/tonic tonal structure of the sonata form, but the fact that his melodies are generally modal, and that he boldly slips into an unexpected chromaticism gives new life to this model. In this case, a piano accompaniment that was based on a Schoenberg-like tone row. This first movement is very serious, even gruff, in tone.
The second movement is an adagio with rich counterpoint. It has an other-worldly quality, which is unusual for the usually down-to-earth Piston. It also has a serious mood.
Piston lightens up in the final movement, a piece that makes chromaticism seem funny. Light and witty rhythms deriving from mundane sources - tango, polka, and march - are common. This sonata has remained one of the most frequently played and recorded of American flute pieces. Joseph Stevenson
Flute Sonata was written in 1930 and dedicated to Georges Laurent, the long-time principal flautist of the Boston Symphony Orchestra and a legendary teacher at the New England Conservatory, who premiered it in 1931.
The work was greatly influenced by his studies of Arnold Schoenbergs twelve-tone technique, which was applied in his First Symphony (1937) as well.
In 1930, Piston was a young faculty member at Harvard University. He had recently returned from Paris (1924–1926), where he studied with Nadia Boulanger. The Sonata is a direct product of this Boulangerie training, emphasizing crystalline textures, formal clarity, and tonal stability. Boulanger famously obsessed over the structural continuity of a work. Upon reviewing the Sonata, she praised Pistons ability to maintain a seamless melodic arc through the flutes registers, particularly in the Adagio. She frequently used the Sonata as a teaching tool for later students, pointing to its formal proportions as an example of how to balance academic rigor with American vitality.
Along with Aaron Copland, Piston used 1930 to define a specific American style that rejected the emotional excesses of Romanticism. The Sonata established Piston’s reputation as a composer’s composer—someone obsessed with craftsmanship and objective beauty. [masteringtheflute.com]
Art by Juana Valdés Walter Piston - Sonata for Flute & Piano](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w9vUj8TVCOg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Egil Hovland - Lamenti for Orchestra
Lamenti for Orchestra, op. 43 (1963)
I.
II. [5:46]
III. [8:27]
Oslo Philharmonic Orchestra
Oivin Fjeldstad
«Lamenti per Orchestra», which was awarded first prize by «Ny Musikk» in their 1963 Jubilee Competition and was published by Edition Lyche in 1967, is scored for a large orchestra. The composer states: «The work consists of three movements. It is built on the following twelve-tone series, the intervals of which are the same both forwards and backwards: a - a flat - b flat - b natural - g - f sharp - c - d flat - f - e - d - e flat. In the first movement the instruments are piano, strings, trumpets, horns, timpani, and gong. The following elements are used: suspended contours of sonorities in the piano, tone-clusters and glissandi effects in the string orchestra, horizontal linear interplay. The second movement employs a large orchestral apparatus with contrasting bodies of sonorities and structurally conceived curves in the brass, wood winds, strings, and percussion. A couple of shorter sections have an improvisatory character, as the musicians are required to play in individual tempos, as rapidly as possible. The movement ends in a tissue of horizontal lines and a maximum crescendo in the entire percussion group. The third and final movement is marked Calmo (pp). The elements are: floating sonority patterns in triangle, suspended cymbals, chimes, gong, celesta, piano, and harp, an eight-part cluster in the lowest register of the double-basses, a twelve-part cluster in harmonics in the violins. A soprano voice sings vocalizations through the web of sound which gradually dies away at the end». [F 21410]
Art by Henrik Aarrestad Uldalen Egil Hovland - Lamenti for Orchestra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wKQK65FyRhc/mqdefault.jpg)