Mac Pro 6.1 and FCPX - Fast enough for video editing? - Part 6 @ReviewTechTV
Mac Pro 6.1 and FCPX - Fast enough for video editing? - Part 6  @ReviewTechTV
Uploaded December 2023 | Updated September 2026, 19 hours ago
How good are old Mac Pros for video editing with Final Cut Pro?

Playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLerq9Rz9PfluBxfZVTwtRs0cqTULa_Gfy

0:00 Intro
1:01 Video Editing with H264
2:03 Resolution 1080p, PlugIns & Effects
2:26 System utilization
3:00 NVMe SSD
3:57 Video Export (H264 vs. ProRes)
5:01 Some video codecs cause problems (H265)
5:58 Conclusion

Final Cut Pro is professional video editing software developed and distributed by Apple. It is a powerful application used by filmmakers, video producers and content creators to trim, edit videos, add effects, perform color correction, mix sound and much more.

H.264 IPB (also known as H.264 Interframe Compression) and H.264 All-I (also known as H.264 Intraframe Compression) are two different compression methods used in the H.264 video codec. They each have different effects on the way videos are compressed and stored.

The 2013 Mac Pro was a powerful computer when it was released, especially for professional applications like video editing and other creative tasks. However, technology has evolved since then.

The 2013 Mac Pro was equipped with a number of powerful components, including Intel Xeon processors and dedicated graphics cards. However, these components are now outdated compared to the newer models. This can result in longer rendering times and slower performance for demanding video editing tasks.

For a very detailed performance comparison of different video codecs and programs, please look here:

M1 Vs INTEL MAC: Video Render SHOWDOWN
youtube.com/watch?v=thaon3b6yEs

Overall, the suitability of the 2013 Mac Pro for video editing depends on your specific needs and expectations. For less demanding tasks or if you're running older versions of software, the 2013 Mac Pro might still offer acceptable performance. However, if high performance and efficiency are required for video editing, it would probably make more sense to invest in a newer Mac Studio with Apple Silicon.

// This video does not include product placement. I got the product myself. //
Mac Pro 6.1 and FCPX - Fast enough for video editing? - Part 6EIZO FlexScan - 24 vs 27 inch for Video Editing (EV2750 EV2451)Motorola TLKR T92 h2o - Two Way Radio (Review and Range Test)Steinberg UR12 USB Audio Interface (Review and Microphone Comparison)Focusrite Scarlett Solo - Audio Interface Review (USB 2nd gen)Behringer ULTRAVOICE XM8500 - Best cheap microphone for gaming?Retevis RT628 - PMR Kids Walkie Talkies (Review and Range Test)OBS Audio Filter Alternative - DBX 266 XS Dual Compressor/GateSamson Q4 Dynamic Microphone Review (Streaming, Podcasting)Topcom Twintalker 9500 - Airsoft Walkie Talkies (Review and Range Test)Best Thunderbolt 3 Monitor for MacBook Pro? ASUS ProArt PA27ACYamaha AG06 USB Audio Interface Mixer Review (Podcast, Gaming)
Review Tech TV |

Mac Pro 6.1 and FCPX - Fast enough for video editing? - Part 6

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER