Liz Jackson vs Graham Oppy (Debate on Pascal’s Wager) @lizjackson111
Liz Jackson vs Graham Oppy (Debate on Pascal’s Wager)  @lizjackson111
Uploaded July 2021 | Updated September 2026, 17 hours ago
In this video, Dr. Graham Oppy and I discuss Pascal's wager.

My opening statement is based on the chapter on Pascal's wager in Dr. Oppy's book, Arguing about Gods: amazon.com/Arguing-about-Gods-Graham-Oppy/dp/0521122643

My paper, Salvaging Pascal's wager: philpapers.org/rec/JACSPW

My paper, Faithfully Taking Pascal's wager: philpapers.org/rec/JACFTP-2

Thanks to James with Modern Day Debate for moderating! (This debate was original held on MDD.) Check out James' channel here: youtube.com/channel/UC_cd4oF2phaIBD3WsU3f7Xg

0:00 Liz Opening Statement
18:33 What does it mean to wager?
29:31 Many gods objection
32:33 Who should wager?
35:50 The Atheist wager
42:43 Finite wagers
46:43 Epistemic permissivism
1:03:37 Many gods and mixed strategies
1:08:37 Arguments and theories
1:19:22 Q&A

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my website: liz-jackson.com
For more on my research: liz-jackson.com/research
For popular-level interviews, podcasts, and blog posts I’ve done: http://liz-jackson.com/public-philoso...

Follow me on social media:
Twitter: twitter.com/lizjackson111
Instagram: @lizjackson111
Facebook: facebook.com/lizjackson111
Liz Jackson vs Graham Oppy (Debate on Pascal’s Wager)What Is Knowledge? (The Problem with “True Belief”)Atheism vs Faith (It’s Not What You Think)How to Disagree Without Being a Jerk (with Sawyer Bullock)2019 Fantasy Football Draft OrderShould Disagreement Change Your Mind?A sneak peek at the NEW BOOK Im working on!What Is an Argument? A Clear Introduction to Arguments (Simple)What People Really Mean (In Arguments)Christians Need to Stop Saying This3 Problems With Pascal’s Wager (Answered)Can This Theory Save Evidentialism?
PhiLIZophy |

Liz Jackson vs Graham Oppy (Debate on Pascal’s Wager)

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER