Kate Molinas Opposite, Hypocritical Legal Arguments @LaughingAtLiberals
Kate Molinas Opposite, Hypocritical Legal Arguments  @LaughingAtLiberals
Uploaded August 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 hours ago
In the case of State v Strickland (me), Multnomah county deputy district attorney Kate Molina argued that a gang of thugs shouting "GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE" while engaging in assaultive behavior toward a news videographer in an effort to prevent the news videographer from being in a public area isn't unlawful, but rather peacefully asking someone to leave. It's the journalist who's guilty of crimes if they interpret such actions to be hostile and threatening, and acts in self defense.

But in the case of State v Danialle James, Molina made the exact opposite argument, saying that it was unlawful for Danialle James to use force against KATU cameraman Carter Maynard at a protest, that such acts meet the statutory definition of Assault and Harassment. Molina claimed that Maynard had every right to be there, he was just doing his job.

If the latter were the case, then one would be justified in defending themselves against the unlawful force. But that's now the case law precedents currently stand.
Kate Molinas Opposite, Hypocritical Legal ArgumentsWell Pull You Out And Kill You! Antifa To TruckerOn To The Supreme Court Of The United StatesAnti Trump Protesters Flee Flash Bang GrenadesProsecutors DEFEND Protesters Wearing MasksPart 10: $15 Now Protest, Portland State University. Uncut, raw footageMalcolm Chaddock, Self Appointed Peacekeeper?Robert Barnes Speaks After Michael Strickland Appeals HearingStudents Speak Out Against Mask MandatesRaw Footage (Clip 56): Trump Protest, Eugene, OregonProtesters Want To ASSASSINATE TrumpConcerned Parent Points Out Contradictions And Absurdities In School Mask Mandates
LaughingAtLiberals |

Kate Molina's Opposite, Hypocritical Legal Arguments

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER