Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Support the children:
fnd.us/FormanAndAssociates?ref=sh_8M61SkWU5mX8M61SkWU5mX
A newly filed memorandum in the Karen Read civil case is raising serious questions about Judge Mark Gildea’s docketing procedures, transparency, and impartiality.
Karen Read’s attorneys are asking the court to complete the official record and explain why certain filings allegedly could not be accepted or docketed without prior court approval. According to the motion, one filing was described by the Clerk’s Office as having been “blocked by the court,” while another could not be docketed until the judge approved it.
The filing also addresses correspondence connected to Michael Proctor that the court allegedly considered when making prior decisions—even though the underlying letters did not appear on the public docket.
In this video, Larry examines:
What Karen Read’s new motion requests
Why the missing correspondence matters
The allegations concerning blocked filings
The importance of a complete appellate record
Whether these procedures raise legitimate questions about judicial impartiality and transparency
The statements discussed are allegations and arguments contained in court filings. This video provides legal commentary and analysis and does not constitute legal advice.
#KarenRead #JudgeGildea #LawTube
Get your Merch Here: the-dui-guys-store.creator-spring.com
Need an attorney? Call 502-931-6788 or email Larry@LarryFormanLaw.com
OR
Schedule an appointment: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work together to solve your problem!
Connect With Attorney Larry Forman:
Website: larryformanlaw.com
X: https://x.com/FormanLaw1
TikTok: tiktok.com/@formanlaw1
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/033uVqeKXpa514yF88YUfX
Facebook: facebook.com/FormanLaw1
Instagram: instagram.com/FormanLaw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/FormanLaw
Locals: theduiguyplus.locals.com
CashApp: http://cash.app/LarryForman
#BuckleUp #ItsTheLaw #FreeKarenRead
Support the children:
fnd.us/FormanAndAssociates?ref=sh_8M61SkWU5mX8M61SkWU5mX
A newly filed memorandum in the Karen Read civil case is raising serious questions about Judge Mark Gildea’s docketing procedures, transparency, and impartiality.
Karen Read’s attorneys are asking the court to complete the official record and explain why certain filings allegedly could not be accepted or docketed without prior court approval. According to the motion, one filing was described by the Clerk’s Office as having been “blocked by the court,” while another could not be docketed until the judge approved it.
The filing also addresses correspondence connected to Michael Proctor that the court allegedly considered when making prior decisions—even though the underlying letters did not appear on the public docket.
In this video, Larry examines:
What Karen Read’s new motion requests
Why the missing correspondence matters
The allegations concerning blocked filings
The importance of a complete appellate record
Whether these procedures raise legitimate questions about judicial impartiality and transparency
The statements discussed are allegations and arguments contained in court filings. This video provides legal commentary and analysis and does not constitute legal advice.
#KarenRead #JudgeGildea #LawTube
Get your Merch Here: the-dui-guys-store.creator-spring.com
Need an attorney? Call 502-931-6788 or email Larry@LarryFormanLaw.com
OR
Schedule an appointment: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work together to solve your problem!
Connect With Attorney Larry Forman:
Website: larryformanlaw.com
X: https://x.com/FormanLaw1
TikTok: tiktok.com/@formanlaw1
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/033uVqeKXpa514yF88YUfX
Facebook: facebook.com/FormanLaw1
Instagram: instagram.com/FormanLaw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/FormanLaw
Locals: theduiguyplus.locals.com
CashApp: http://cash.app/LarryForman
#BuckleUp #ItsTheLaw #FreeKarenRead
