Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fallacy of Composition @firstcauseargument
Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fallacy of Composition @firstcauseargument
firstcauseargument | Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fallacy of Composition @firstcauseargument | Uploaded June 2012 | Updated October 2024, 6 hours ago.
Some skeptics and atheists have tried to refute the Kalam Cosmological Argument with the following rebuttal: "The first premise is based upon the fallacy of composition. It fallaciously infers that because everything in the universe has a cause, therefore the whole universe has a cause."

William Lane Craig responds to this so-called refutation.
Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fallacy of CompositionAttacking Causality is Self-Refuting - R. C. Sproul, PhDStephen Hawking on the Big Bang and the Beginning of the Universe and TimeIs the Causal Principle Incompatible with the Kalam Cosmological Argument?The Absolute Beginning of the Universe is Unavoidable (Kalam Cosmological Argument)The Cyclic Ekpyrotic Universe Fails (Stephen M. Barr, PhD)Second Law of Thermodynamics - The Beginning of the Universe (Kalam Cosmological Argument)The Big Bang and the Beginning of the Universe (Stephen Barr, PhD)Does Kalam Equivocate with the Word Cause?Hilberts HotelEastwooding Richard Dawkins by William Lane Craig, PhDJonathan Edwards on Creation Ex Nihilo (Joe Rigney)

Kalam Cosmological Argument and Fallacy of Composition @firstcauseargument

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER