Uploaded June 2012 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
Some skeptics and atheists have tried to refute the Kalam Cosmological Argument with the following rebuttal: "The argument commits the fallacy of equivocation. In the first premise 'cause' means 'material cause,' while in the conclusion it does not."
William Lane Craig responds to this so-called refutation.
Some skeptics and atheists have tried to refute the Kalam Cosmological Argument with the following rebuttal: "The argument commits the fallacy of equivocation. In the first premise 'cause' means 'material cause,' while in the conclusion it does not."
William Lane Craig responds to this so-called refutation.










