Why the Kalam Cosmological Argument Succeeds @firstcauseargument
Why the Kalam Cosmological Argument Succeeds  @firstcauseargument
Uploaded November 2012 | Updated September 2026, 19 hours ago
Frank Turek (PhD, author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist) gives scientific and philosophical evidence for the Kalam Cosmological Argument for the existence of God via his "SURGE" argument - The Second Law of Thermodynamics, the Expanding Universe, the Radiation Afterglow from the Big Bang Explosion, the Great galaxy seeds in the Radiation Afterglow, and Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Turek also deals with varioius refutations made by Richard Dawkins (author of The God Delusion) and Christopher Hitchens (author of God is Not Great).
Why the Kalam Cosmological Argument SucceedsKalam Cosmological Argument: A Scientific Fact - logosapologia.orgBig Bang Cosmology and the Existence of God (Peter Kreeft)Atheist Warns: Do Not Underestimate William Lane CraigThe Atheist War Against Logic and PhilosophyThe Pseudo-Science of AtheistsCausality, Personal Causality and the Science/Religion Dialogue (Thomas Fowler)David Hume and the Causal PrincipleThe Borde Guth Vilenkin Theorem - Alexander Vilenkin, PhDThe Beginning of the Universe and Fine-Tuning  - Robert J. Spitzer, PhD. & Bruce Gordon, PhDModern Science and the Kalam Cosmological Argument - William Lane Craig, PhDBorde Guth Vilenkin Theorem: Scientific Evidence for the Beginning of the Universe
firstcauseargument |

Why the Kalam Cosmological Argument Succeeds

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER