Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Become a VladStocks Member now: youtube.com/vladtv/join
--------
Judge Greg Mathis joins VladTV to break down the Keefe D trial in the 1996 Tupac Shakur murder case, explaining why he believes prosecutors have not met the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required in Nevada. Speaking as closing arguments head toward the jury, Mathis weighs the impact of Keefe D’s paid interviews, alleged boasts, and the lack of direct evidence placing him in Las Vegas at the time of the shooting. Vlad also reflects on his own interview being used in court, the Mike Tyson fight, Death Row Records, Orlando Anderson, Suge Knight conspiracy theories, and the long shadow of Black Panther-era surveillance involving Afeni Shakur and Malcolm X. Mathis clarifies the difference between civil and criminal burdens of proof, discusses a possible hung jury or mistrial, and predicts how plea negotiations could unfold if the state chooses to retry the case.
Become a VladStocks Member now: youtube.com/vladtv/join
--------
Judge Greg Mathis joins VladTV to break down the Keefe D trial in the 1996 Tupac Shakur murder case, explaining why he believes prosecutors have not met the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard required in Nevada. Speaking as closing arguments head toward the jury, Mathis weighs the impact of Keefe D’s paid interviews, alleged boasts, and the lack of direct evidence placing him in Las Vegas at the time of the shooting. Vlad also reflects on his own interview being used in court, the Mike Tyson fight, Death Row Records, Orlando Anderson, Suge Knight conspiracy theories, and the long shadow of Black Panther-era surveillance involving Afeni Shakur and Malcolm X. Mathis clarifies the difference between civil and criminal burdens of proof, discusses a possible hung jury or mistrial, and predicts how plea negotiations could unfold if the state chooses to retry the case.
